President-elect Barack Obama will pursue a more careful course in foreign policy; however, many aspects of his political agenda are dubious, at least according to Vladimir Anohin, Pravda.ru’s permanent expert and the vice-president of the Academy of Geopolitical Problems. “Obama’s careful approach to U.S. foreign policy is a positive aspect. While the Democratic Party has also supported aggressive actions in its foreign policy, it has taken a softer approach than the Republicans. Obama is a rational politician, and unlike his rival John McCain, he is not militaristically inclined,” supposes the expert.
“Obama has formulated a sufficiently clear economic program for tackling the credit crisis. The crisis has spread around the globe; hence this program is very important for the entire world. He has a plan for reforming American society and that is another positive aspect,” Anohin believes.
“Nonetheless, some aspects of Obama’s political agenda raise strong suspicions. For instance, Obama’s advisers include Russian foes like Zbigniew Brzezinski and Madeleine Albright. These are the hawks inclined to pursue a hard-line policy,” says the expert.
“In terms of the U.S. policy towards Russia, a regrouping of forces will occur after Obama’s victory, and Obama will take a subsequent time-out. His policy approach to our country will be cautious. It is highly possible that he will involve the European countries in a dialogue with Russia, which will make that dialogue more rational and less emotional,” concluded Anohin.
At present, votes are still being counted in the United States. Fifty-two percent of Americans voted for Obama; forty-seven percent, for McCain. Obama has secured 338 electoral votes, whereas McCain only has 163.
During the Cold War, the United States occupied the apex of this triangular dynamic, pitting China and the USSR against each other. Today, it is Beijing that occupies that apex.
Secretary Rubio’s ‘diplomatic masterstroke’ in Delhi unintentionally transformed political damage control into an involuntary roast of his own boss.
The Beijing summit did not produce a major agreement between the great powers on the region, but it firmly established that Middle Eastern crises are now deeply tied to the great-power dialogue.
A summit that would normally send a reassuring message ... faces total uncertainty thanks to the weakness of the United States. The only person to blame for this is Trump.
History has never witnessed a leader quite like Donald Trump — a mix of ignorance, arrogance immorality, brazenness, insensitivity and sheer stupidity.
The challenge for Washington is no longer whether it possesses sufficient capabilities, but whether the political system can align those capabilities behind a coherent long-term priority.
The Beijing summit did not produce a major agreement between the great powers on the region, but it firmly established that Middle Eastern crises are now deeply tied to the great-power dialogue.