Emerging Features in US-Japan Relations

Published in Xinhua
(China) on 25 April 2013
by Wang Shaopu (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Leonard Fung. Edited by Mary Young.
As U.S. strategic thinking gradually matures, it is increasingly responding to major global trends with the aim of shaping a new international system; calls for a more flexible China policy are also on the rise.

The U.S. sees China as its main competitor and partner in the new international system; as it uses Japanese support in launching its new strategy, U.S.-Japanese relations will become more unstable.

In President Obama's second term, new features are appearing in the global strategy of the U.S., the core of which is a rebalancing of its strategy toward the Asia-Pacific region.

First, the U.S. is paying more attention to overall strategic deployment in safeguarding its strategic priorities. Previously, the U.S. was more focused on beefing up its strength in the Asia-Pacific region, whereas now it gives more consideration to each country’s status, role and development prospects, as well as mutual influence and support. Of particular interest was the increased attention on leveraging the transatlantic partnership. The Atlantic Council, an important U.S. think tank, emphasizes, "America's transatlantic alliance continues to be the core of our foreign and economic policies" and should be "a key pillar of U.S. strategy in Eurasia and beyond."*

Secondly, it is focusing more on reshaping the international economic order. Economic globalization has created a dispersion of economic power beyond the control of the West; the multipolarization of the world stems directly from this. Dominance in the international economic order is the foundation of U.S. dominance in foreign policy, security and other areas; reshaping the international system necessarily requires reshaping the international economic order. For this reason, the U.S. has urged Japan to join its Trans-Pacific Strategic Economic Partnership Agreement; at the same time, it has formally begun negotiations with the EU over a Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership Agreement. Through these initiatives, the U.S. is attempting to improve its economic dynamism and competitiveness, as well as help itself and other wealthy countries re-establish their dominant position in the international economic order from a new starting point.

Thirdly, the U.S. is demonstrating increased flexibility in its policy toward China. The basic motivation for the Asia-Pacific rebalancing strategy is the worry that China's rise will upset the Asia-Pacific strategic balance, resulting in the loss of U.S. dominance in the region. For this reason, when the strategy was first put forward, the intention of containing China was glaringly conspicuous and met with vehement protest from China. For Washington and Beijing, mutual distrust and accusations were reaching disquieting levels. At the same time, as U.S. strategic thinking gradually matures, becoming more grounded in global trends and aimed toward reshaping the international system, the U.S. is reconsidering its Asia-Pacific rebalancing strategy and China policy. With this backdrop, there have been increasing calls for a more flexible China policy arising from all levels of the U.S. government. Newly appointed Secretary of State John Kerry expressed that the U.S. "wants a strong, normal, but special relationship with China ... because China is a great power with a great ability to affect events in the world. And we need to work together to do that."

As part of the U.S.' readjustment of its world strategy, new features are emerging in its relationship with Japan, mainly:

1. Previously, U.S. strategy was founded on using Japan to counterbalance Chinese power in the Asia-Pacific region, whereas now it has a broader outlook and is focused on using Japan to reshape the international system.

2. The U.S. will take a greater interest in Japanese economic recovery and the degree of Japan’s cooperation in reshaping the international economic order.

3. Because the U.S. sees China as both its main competitor and partner in building a new international system while Japan provides much of the weight behind the U.S.' revised strategy, U.S.-Japanese relations will become more unstable.

Recognizing and understanding these new features will be important to managing Sino-Japanese relations.

The author of this article is Director of the Center for Japanese Studies at Shanghai Jiao Tong University.

*Editor’s Note: This quote, while accurately translated, could not be verified.


美日关系显露新特点

王少普

  伴随战略思考的逐步成熟,美国更注意从全球大趋势出发,从塑造新的国际体制出发,要求增强对华政策弹性的呼声在上升

  美国将中国视为新国际体制的主要竞争对手与合作伙伴,而日本是美国展开上述战略的借助力量,美日关系不稳定性将增强

  奥巴马总统第二任期,美国以“亚太再平衡战略”为核心的全球战略调整,出现新特点。

  其一,在保证战略重点的同时,更注意全盘战略部署。原来,美国更多关注的是对亚太力量的投入;而现在,则在保证重点的同时,注意联系各主要战略 区的地位、作用和发展前景,联系各主要战略区的相互影响和支持,做全盘战略部署。突出的表现是,更注意发挥泛大西洋伙伴关系的作用。美国重要智库大西洋理 事会强调,“美国的泛大西洋联盟继续成为其对外政策和经济政策的核心”,应以其作为“美国朝向欧亚大陆以及更广泛区域战略的关键支柱”。

  其二,更注意重塑国际经济秩序。 经济全球化,造成超越西方控制的经济实力变得分散。世界的多极化,正是在此基础上形成的。国际经济秩序的主导地位,是美国在外交、安全等领域主导地位的基 础,要重塑国际体制,必须重塑国际经济秩序。因此,美国力促日本加入《跨太平洋战略经济伙伴关系协定》;同时,美国还将与欧盟正式启动关于 《跨大西洋贸易与投资伙伴关系协议》的谈判。美国力图通过以上举措,提升其经济活力和竞争力,并帮助美国与其他发达国家,在新的起点重建国际经济秩序的主 导地位。

  其三,对华政策的弹性增大。美国“亚太再平衡战略”形成的基本动因,是担心中国崛起打破亚太战略平衡,导致美国丧失在亚太地区的主导地位。因 此,该战略在刚提出时,对华遏制意图跃然纸上。这种做法,遭到中国的强烈反对,“对于华盛顿和北京来说,战略上互不信任以及相互指责已经提高到令人不安的 程度”。同时,伴随着战略思考的逐步成熟,美国更注意从全球大趋势出发,从塑造新的国际体制出发,重新考虑“亚太再平衡战略”以及对华政策。在上述背景 下,美国上下要求增强对华政策弹性的呼声在上升。美国新任国务卿克里访华时表示“美国期待着一个强健正常并特殊的中美关系。特殊是因为中国是一个大国,对 世界有强大的影响力,我们需要共同的合作以实现这一目标”。

  在美国世界战略调整新特点的影响下,美日关系也显示出新特点,主要为:

  其一,如果说,此前美国主要是从在亚太地区平衡中国力量出发,利用日本力量;那么现在则会从更广阔的视野,也即从塑造新的国际体制出发,利用日本力量。

  其二,美国将更加关注日本的经济复苏和日本在重塑国际经济秩序方面与美国的合作程度。

  其三,由于美国将中国视为其塑造新的国际体制的主要竞争对手与合作伙伴,而日本在很大程度上是美国展开上述战略的借助力量,美日关系的不稳定性将增强。

  认识和把握上述特点,对处理中日关系具有重要意义。 (作者系上海交大日本研究中心主任)
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Germany: Absolute Arbitrariness

Venezuela: Vietnam: An Outlet for China

Germany: Cynicism, Incompetence and Megalomania

Israel: Trump’s National Security Adviser Forgot To Leave Personal Agenda at Home and Fell

Switzerland: Donald Trump: 100 Days Already, but How Many Years?

     

Topics

Mexico: EU: Concern for the Press

Austria: Musk, the Man of Scorched Earth

Germany: Cynicism, Incompetence and Megalomania

Switzerland: Donald Trump: 100 Days Already, but How Many Years?

     

Austria: Donald Trump Revives the Liberals in Canada

Germany: Absolute Arbitrariness

Israel: Trump’s National Security Adviser Forgot To Leave Personal Agenda at Home and Fell

Mexico: The Trump Problem

Related Articles

Mexico: The Trump Problem

Taiwan: Making America Great Again and Taiwan’s Crucial Choice

Venezuela: Vietnam: An Outlet for China

Germany: US Companies in Tariff Crisis: Planning Impossible, Price Increases Necessary

Hong Kong: Can US Tariffs Targeting Hong Kong’s ‘Very Survival’ Really Choke the Life out of It?