Large Changes to be Brought by the First African-American Nominee

Published in China News
(China) on 2008-06-04
by Jiesi Li (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Weihao Zhang. Edited by .
On June 3, Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama declared his victory in the party primaries and became the Democratic presidential nominee. Comments from CNN said that Obama became the first African-American in the history of the United States to win major votes in main political parties. This is also exactly what he called the "national decisive moment."

Shen Dingli, Executive Vice-President of China Fudan University International Institute, told to the "Huanqiu News" reporters that it can not be said that Obama's victory represents the racial progress within American society. Precisely, he won the primaries just because he seldom played this “race card." On the contrary, the failure of Hillary Clinton proved that she played her “husband card” too much.

In Shen’s opinion, after an eight-year republican rule, Americans are eager to seek "a major change." Because her husband is the former president, Hillary Clinton stepped onto the primary stage with extreme confidence. She, unlike the other candidates, did not have to raise funds since she was already quite familiar with many of the Super Delegates. But this self-confidence became a huge disadvantage in later primaries.

”As wife of former president, in essence, the American people are electing another ‘Clinton.' Therefore the changes in American society in future have become ‘predictable’ as well.” “On the other hand,” Shen said, young and inexperienced Obama may make the nation even worse. But he is also likely to lead the country to an "unexpectedly great direction." Obama's victory shows that the American people are willing to bear the "unknown future" that Obama will bring rather than Clinton’s "predicted one." Therefore, "Obama is not too strong. Instead, it is Hillary Clinton who is too weak."

As for the "one-on-one" election which Obama will soon face in the future with Republican presidential nominee John McCain, Shen pointed out that McCain's political experience before the election places him as “the strongest candidate." However, his weakness is also very obvious. On one hand, McCain is a little too old at the age of 72; on the other hand, McCain is politically very conservative on “national defense issues” which are most Americans’ greatest concern. He once claimed the "Garrison for 100 years" plan in Iraq for the American troops, which is likely to become a key factor in his losing a larger amount of votes.

What are the odds for Obama to win over McCain? Shen said that Obama's victory in the party primaries could not make certain that the American people really have ignored the factor of his race. There is a higher possibility that Obama may become the target of scandal exposure by his opponents. And his lack of governing experience for a superpower can create barriers to the presidency as well. "The polls in the past can only represent the past. Obama will have to face many 'real' problems," said Shen Dingli.

At the same time, Shen Dingli also believes that Obama does not rule out inviting Hillary Clinton as his VP in order to run together. But if he made such a decision, "he is not just helping out Hillary, but also helping himself.” "When Obama realized he cannot win this 'one-on-one' competition with McCain, he may need Hillary Clinton's experience and the votes. For Clinton, she may consider running for president again in the future and she may agree to be Obama’s VP," Shen said. "Currently, Clinton and Obama are still in 'positive interaction'."

As for the future China policy, Shen Dingli insisted that whoever, Obama or McCain, is successfully elected, their changes on U.S.-China policy will only be in some "specific manners". "In fact, the key to Sino-American relations progress lies in China’s own efforts. As long as China getting stronger, the U.S. President from any political party will not ignore its cooperation with China."


北京时间6月4日(美国当地时间6月3日),美国民主党总统竞选人奥巴马宣布在该党初选中胜出,获得民主党总统候选人提名。美国有线电视新闻网(CNN) 评论道,奥巴马成为了美国历史上第一位在主要政党票选胜出的非洲裔美国人,这也是他所谓的“对于国家具有决定性的时刻”。

复旦大学国际问题研究院常务副院长沈丁立在接受《环球时报》采访时认为,还不能说奥巴马的胜利就代表了美国社会种族观念的进步,奥巴马的胜利恰恰是因为他“不打种族牌”,而希拉里败就败在“她姓克林顿”。

  沈丁立认为,当美国历经了8年共和党的执政后,美国民众迫切希望寻求“大变革”。因为丈夫是比尔·克林顿,希拉里在初选阶段的信心极度爆棚。她不用像其他参选人那样去筹款,她以前就认识许多超级代表,但这种自信反而成了希拉里选举时的弱势。

  “希拉里姓‘克林顿’,从本质上说,美国民众还是在选‘克林顿’,美国社会的变革也因此变得‘可以预见’。”沈丁立说,但反观奥巴马,他的年轻、没有经验可能会使美国变得更糟,但也有可能使美国变得“无法预见地好”。奥巴马的胜选说明美国民众愿意承受奥巴马所带给美国社会的“未知前途”。因此,“不是奥巴马太强,而是希拉里太弱。”

  而对于奥巴马即将在未来面对与共和党总统候选人麦凯恩的“一对一”竞选,沈丁立教授认为,麦凯恩之前的参政经验使得他成为几位候选人中“实力最强的”人选,但是他的软肋也非常明显。一方面是麦凯恩年龄偏大,另一方面,麦凯恩在美国民众最为关心的“国家防务问题上”政见非常保守,他主张美军在伊拉克“驻军一百年”,这很有可能成为麦凯恩流失选票的关键因素。

  奥巴马“单挑”麦凯恩的胜算到底有多少?沈丁立教授称,奥巴马党内初选的胜利并不能代表美国民众就真正可以忽略他的种族因素了,而奥巴马未来有可能被对手揭露的丑闻和其自身缺乏执政超级大国经验的劣势,都很有可能成为最终的羁绊。“过去的民调只能代表过去,奥巴马还要面对许多‘现实’问题。”沈丁立这样说道。

  与此同时,沈丁立也认为,并不排除奥巴马邀希拉里作副手的可能性,但倘若他做出这样的决定,“也不是为了帮希拉里,而是为了帮自己”。“当奥巴马认为自己无法‘一对一’与麦凯恩竞争时,他可能会需要希拉里的经验和选票,而希拉里也可能出于日后再次竞选的考虑,同意做副手。”沈丁立说,“现在,希拉里与奥巴马之间还处于一个‘良性互动’。”

  至于各总统竞选人未来的对华政策问题,沈丁立表示,无论奥巴马还是麦凯恩成功获选,在对华政策上都只是在“对华具体方式”上有所改变,实际上,中美关系的发展关键还是在于中国自己。只要中国自身实力强大,美国任何政党的总统上台都不会忽视与中国的合作。(记者 李洁思)
【编辑:曹昆】
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Germany: Absolute Arbitrariness

Austria: Musk, the Man of Scorched Earth

Austria: Donald Trump Revives the Liberals in Canada

Switzerland: Donald Trump: 100 Days Already, but How Many Years?

     

Mexico: The Trump Problem

Topics

Mexico: EU: Concern for the Press

Austria: Musk, the Man of Scorched Earth

Germany: Cynicism, Incompetence and Megalomania

Switzerland: Donald Trump: 100 Days Already, but How Many Years?

     

Austria: Donald Trump Revives the Liberals in Canada

Germany: Absolute Arbitrariness

Israel: Trump’s National Security Adviser Forgot To Leave Personal Agenda at Home and Fell

Mexico: The Trump Problem

Related Articles

Mexico: The Trump Problem

Taiwan: Making America Great Again and Taiwan’s Crucial Choice

Venezuela: Vietnam: An Outlet for China

Germany: US Companies in Tariff Crisis: Planning Impossible, Price Increases Necessary

Hong Kong: Can US Tariffs Targeting Hong Kong’s ‘Very Survival’ Really Choke the Life out of It?