Barack Obama… Beginning of the End?

Published in El ABC
(Spain) on 6 October 2009
by Anna Grau (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by David McCafferty. Edited by Robin Silberman.
Let’s suppose you were the president of the United States, and the home and that of your wife and children – apart from the White House – was in Chicago. And that those in charge of Chicago 2016 asked you to lend a hand with the Olympic candidacy, even though they knew or suspected that Chicago was not going to win…Therefore, if you did not go to Copenhagen, they would blame you for not having shown enough interest. And if you did go, you would be soundly beaten. You, who appeared to be the Superman of international relations.

This is the situation in which Barack Obama finds himself since the International Olympic Committee’s verdict, and which the American far right has heralded as "the first great defeat" of Obamaism. When images of the Republicans celebrating and cheering Chicago’s defeat appeared on the internet, the Democrats were angered. They have begun to accuse the Grand Old Party of putting party interests before national ones: anti-Obamaism to the point of anti-Americanism.

It seems that Republicans and Democrats have switched roles. In George W. Bush’s era, it was the conservatives who accused the anti-Iraq war liberals of undermining the country’s policies and interests with their protests. Now it is the Democrats who are asking if Chicago is not American enough for the enemies of Obama.

The torrent of criticism started before Copenhagen. In the beginning the president did not have to be present at the Olympic event, but the candidacy promoters cried out for him to attend. The most serious analysts maintained that this was an important miscalculation: They highlighted that Chicago was never a possible favorite, and demanding the presence of the president was ignoring this fact. The fact that the city was not only eliminated, but that it was eliminated in the first round of voting, has proved particularly humiliating and a hard pill to swallow for the White House.

The Gloves Come Off

And this is where the American far right has got its act together: if before Copenhagen they dismissed the importance of the Olympic event and criticized Obama for dedicating his time to such things instead of tackling growing unemployment and the ever-more intense public health debate, after Copenhagen the accusation is that he has made a fool of himself, not to mention highlighting "the limits" of his supposed international popularity.

Commentators like Glenn Beck on Fox and Newt Gingrich were quick to launch an attack ("President Obama fails in his attempt to bring the Games to Chicago the same day that unemployment reaches 9.8%...The country needs leadership"). But above all, the conservative radio guru Rush Limbaugh was the most brazen in his delight, and said so: "Am I happy? Well, yes! I don’t deny it! I’m happy because what I want most in the world is that Obama fails and all his ideas do with him!"

[Editor’s note: some quotes may be worded based on translated material].


Pongamos que usted fuera el presidente de los Estados Unidos. Y que el hogar y el de su mujer y sus hijas -Casa Blanca aparte- estuviese en Chicago. Y que los de Chicago 2016 le pidiesen que arrimara el hombro con la candidatura olímpica, aún sabiendo o sospechando que Chicago no va a ganar... Con lo cual, si usted no va a Copenhague, le culpan de no haber puesto suficiente interés. Y si va, de llevarse un revolcón. Usted, que parecía el Superman de las relaciones exteriores.
En esta situación se encuentra Barack Obama desde el veredicto del Comité Olímpico Internacional, que la ultraderecha estadounidense ha saludado como «la primera gran derrota» del obamismo. Cuando aparecieron en internet imágenes de republicanos celebrando con aplausos la derrota de Chicago, los demócratas se indignaron. Han empezado a acusar al Viejo Gran Partido (GOP, por sus siglas en inglés) de anteponer el interés partidista al nacional. De hacer antiobamismo hasta el punto del antiamericanismo.
Da la impresión de que republicanos y demócratas se hayan intercambiado los papeles. En época de George W. Bush eran los conservadores los que acusaban a la progresía anti-guerra de Irak de socavar la política y los intereses del país con sus protestas. Ahora los demócratas son los que preguntan si Chicago no es suficientemente América para los enemigos de Obama.
La escalada de críticas ya empezó antes de Copenhague. Al principio el presidente no tenía que estar presente en la cita olímpica. Los promotores de la candidatura pusieron el grito en el cielo para que acudiera. Los analistas más serios sostienen que aquello ya fue un importante error de cálculo: subrayan que Chicago nunca fue una favorita con posibilidades, y que exigir la presencia del presidente era ignorar esto. El hecho de que la ciudad no sólo cayera eliminada sino que lo fuera en la primera votación ha resultado especialmente humillante y especialmente duro de tragar para la Casa Blanca.
Se ponen las botas
Y aquí es donde la ultraderecha americana se ha puesto las pilas: si antes de Copenhague quitaban importancia al compromiso olímpico y reprochaban a Obama que se dedicara a estas cosas en lugar de a lidiar con el creciente paro y el cada vez más enconado debate sanitario, después de Copenhague la acusación era de haberse puesto en ridículo. Y haber evidenciado «los límites» de su pretendida hiperpopularidad internacional.
Se pusieron las botas comentaristas como Glenn Beck en la Fox, como New Gingrich («El presidente Obama fracasa en el intento de traer los Juegos a Chicago el mismo día que el desempleo llega al 9,8 por ciento... El país necesita liderazgo»). Pero sobre todo el gurú radiofónico conservador Russ Limbaugh. Éste fue el más descarado en alegrarse y así lo dijo: «¿Que si me alegro? ¡Pues sí! ¡No lo niego! ¡Soy feliz porque lo que más deseo en el mundo es que Obama fracase y con él todas sus ideas!».
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Germany: If You’re Not for Him, You Should Be Afraid*

Germany: Donald Trump’s Military Intervention in LA Is a Planned Escalation

Venezuela: The Devil in Los Angeles

Poland: Los Angeles Riots: Battle for America’s Future

Canada: President Trump, the G7 and Canada’s New ‘Realistic’ Foreign Policy

Topics

Germany: If You’re Not for Him, You Should Be Afraid*

Austria: Trump Is Playing with Fire. Does He Want the Whole House To Go up in Flames?

Taiwan: Taiwan Issue Will Be Harder To Bypass during Future US-China Negotiations

Venezuela: The Devil in Los Angeles

Germany: Donald Trump’s Military Intervention in LA Is a Planned Escalation

Mexico: Migration: A Political Crisis?

Poland: Los Angeles Riots: Battle for America’s Future

Germany: Donald Trump Is Damaging the US

Related Articles

Spain: Spain’s Defense against Trump’s Tariffs

Spain: Shooting Yourself in the Foot

Spain: King Trump: ‘America Is Back’

Spain: Trump Changes Sides

Spain: Narcissists Trump and Musk: 2 Sides of the Same Coin?