2nd Japan-US Forum: Don’t Create Alibis

Published in Ryukyu Shimpo
(Japan) on 1 June 2026
by (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Dorothy Phoenix. Edited by Michelle Bisson.
For a second time, the Okinawa Community Partnership Forum (the Japan-U.S. Forum) was held. It is a conference aimed at curbing crimes by people affiliated with the U.S. military. It merely confirmed that Japan and the U.S. will investigate measures to effectively prevent recurring crime, but didn’t reach the point of working out a concrete plan.

Prefectural residents want drastic steps to deter crime, and reliable implementation of a plan. Has the forum already been reduced to a mere formality? The only way to describe it is to call it a place where U.S. military crimes are simply highlighted.

Recently, there have been incidents of sexual violence against female victims. It must be said that the lack of action from both the U.S. and Japanese governments allowed this to happen.

The meeting was closed to the public. Although both the U.S. and Japan confirmed that it happened, the results are scanty.

This time, the prefecture brought up the trend of an increasing number of crimes committed by U.S. military members, presenting analytical data on the increase in military crime. Based on the data, they affirmed their intention to research concrete initiatives to address the problem.

It was decided that the Okinawa Orientation Overview, which is offered to U.S. military personnel who are taking up new posts in Okinawa, will be revised. The U.S. military announced the revisions during the first meeting in May of last year. The revisions incorporate guidelines and punishments for drunk driving, as the prefecture requested, and content that includes an increased number of examples and descriptions of sex crimes committed by U.S. military personnel.

Following a succession of biting incidents outside of the military base after dogs kept by U.S. military personnel escaped, Japan and the U.S. shared information about regulations for keeping pets. Also confirmed were support measures that Japanese spouses can use in situations where trouble develops between them and their U.S. military personnel partners.

All of this is limited to confirmations of present conditions and existing content updates, which are nothing new. Regarding joint U.S.-Japanese patrols in Okinawa City to enforce these measures outside of military bases, it was agreed that the patrols would continue to gain an understanding of the local residents, but their effectiveness hasn't been substantiated so far.

The U.S. military announced the establishment of the Japan-U.S. Forum in July 2024, after a series of sex crimes committed by military personnel, but it took 10 months before the first meeting was held. Heading into the meeting with the prefecture, it was clear that the U.S. military indicated reluctance to discuss verification of the effectiveness of crime deterrence measures. The U.S. military showed concern that only crime prevention steps for U.S. military personnel would be covered.

Regarding incident and accident prevention, up to now, the U.S. military also had the Cooperative Working Team, a group of U.S. military personnel and civilians working for the military who collaborated to prevent accidents and trouble. The forum is said to be in place as a substantial successor to the group. The most recent CWT meeting was in 2017. In the past, there was also a council composed of the triple combination of the prefecture of Okinawa, the Japanese government and U.S. personnel stationed in Okinawa, but that has come to an end.

There have been other, similar councils, but they have repeatedly been replaced with other groups, without working out any effective strategies.

In principle, the forum would be held every year, but it must not become a place for creating alibis. In order to hammer out effective steps, discussion that gets to the core issues is necessary. The level of serious commitment from the U.S. and Japan to prevent any more U.S. military crime is in doubt.


<社説>日米フォーラム2回目 アリバイ作りになるな

 米軍関係者の犯罪抑止に向けて日米で協議する「沖縄コミュニティ・パートナーシップ・フォーラム」(日米フォーラム)の2回目の会合が開催された。日米で効果的な再発防止策を検討していくことを確認しただけで、具体的対策を打ち出すには至らなかった。

 県民が求めるのは抜本的な犯罪抑止策と確実な実行である。日米フォーラムは2回目にして早くも形骸化してしまったのではないか。米軍犯罪への対応をアピールするだけの場と言われても仕方がない。

 この間も成人女性を被害者とする性暴力事件が発生した。日米両政府の無策が事件発生を許したと言わざるを得ない。

 会合は非公開だった。日米で確認したこともあるが、成果は乏しい。

 県は今回、増加傾向にある米軍構成員による刑法犯摘発件数を提示し、兵士らの犯罪傾向を分析してデータを示した。データを基に、具体的な取り組みを研究しようと確認したという。

 沖縄に着任した米軍関係者に提供する「沖縄オリエンテーション概要」については、改訂版が決定した。改訂は昨年5月の初会合で米軍が発表していた。県が記載を求めた飲酒運転の基準・罰則が盛り込まれ、米軍関係者による性犯罪の事例や説明内容が増えた。

 基地の外で米軍関係者が飼育する犬が逃走し、咬傷(こうしょう)事故が相次いだことを受けてペットの飼育の規制を日米で情報共有。米軍関係者と日本人配偶者がトラブルになった際、日本人配偶者が利用できる支援策も確認した。

 それらはいずれも現状確認や従来の内容の更新にとどまっており、新味はない。沖縄市の基地外で実施されている日米の合同パトロールについては、地域の理解を得ながら続けていくことを確認したが、実効性の検証まではされなかった。

 日米フォーラムは、米軍人による相次ぐ性暴力を受けて2024年7月に米軍が創設を発表したものだが、初回会合まで10カ月を要した。会合に向けた県との協議で、米軍は犯罪抑止策の効果検証を議論することに難色を示していたことが分かっている。米軍は米軍人の犯罪防止策だけを取り上げられることに懸念を示していたという。

 米軍の事件事故防止では、これまでも「米軍人・軍属等による事件・事故防止のための協力ワーキングチーム(CWT)」があった。フォーラムは実質的にその後継という位置づけだ。CWTは17年を最後に開かれていない。過去には県、国、在沖米軍で構成する三者連絡協議会もあったが、自然消滅した。

 似たような協議体ができては、効果的な対策を打ち出せないまま、別の協議体に替わることが繰り返されてきた。

 日米フォーラムは原則年に1回開かれるが、アリバイ作りの場となってはならない。実効性のある対策を打ち出すため、踏み込んだ議論が必要だ。米軍犯罪をこれ以上繰り返させないため、日米の本気度が問われる。

This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Australia: Trump’s Tariff Game Has Resumed and Australia Could Face Some Curveballs

South Korea: Trump’s Face on a Dollar Bill?

France: Iran: The United States at an Impasse

Poland: Vox Populi Is Not Vox Dei: Democracy Is Mortal and Requires Active Defense*

South Africa: Where’s My Phone? My Golden Trump Phone!

Topics

Germany: Hegseth’s ‘Invasion’ Remarks Raise European Hackles*

South Africa: US World Cup Shenanigans Exposes FIFA’s Double Standards

Saudi Arabia: The Pro-Israel Lobby and US Military ‘Cooperation’

India: US, China Playing Dangerous Gen Z Game in Nepal

Germany: What the National Guard Is Really Contributing in Washington*

Germany: US Imperial Outpost in Space

Brazil: Terrorism To Suit the Customer’s Taste*

Jordan: War for the Occupation

Related Articles

Germany: What the National Guard Is Really Contributing in Washington*

South Korea: Trump’s Move To Cut Troops in Germany Must Not Affect Korean Peninsula

Germany: Europe Last

Israel: Partnership or Dependence? The Danger behind the American Embrace on Iran

Saudi Arabia: A World without NATO… What Would It Look Like?