Where Is the Homeland?

Published in Milenio
(Mexico) on 7 July 2014
by Verónica Mastretta (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Kyle Moore. Edited by Kyrstie Lane.
Throughout human history, people have migrated, usually to find better conditions under which to survive. As the human race mastered agriculture, they stopped being nomads in favor of creating more stable communities. Nevertheless, migration has continued to exist for thousands of years, and the reasons for relocating continue to be diverse.

Although we became sedentary, we lived for thousands of years without the concept of a "homeland" and always had the freedom to emigrate. Based on the theory that the human race emerged from North Africa, all of humanity migrated from there to the rest of the world. Almost all of us are where we are as the result of a migration.

One of the human rights is "free movement, migration, leaving, relocating," of course within the constraints provided by international agreements. That is, one can move from one country to another pursuant to the established legal framework. Of course, that legal framework has exceptions, and chief among them is the right to move for the purpose of survival and for "humanitarian" reasons.

In our country, as recently as 2011 the Migration Act was ratified. Extremely interesting and advanced reforms were made in June 2013, removing the characterization of "criminal conduct" from the act of crossing our territory without papers and guaranteeing the same humanitarian treatment for foreigners that we demand for our compatriots when they go to the United States undocumented, especially children, women with children, and the elderly.

There was a great deal of consistency in that law, and the former legislature should congratulate themselves for that. In Article 37-III, Section E, applicants for refugee status or those applying for humanitarian reasons are exempted from the requirements to enter the country. It is further stipulated that the immigration checkpoints will provide them temporary assistance while their cases are being reviewed. This is theoretically a good step, but in practice the conditions of immigrants are dreadful. The Mexican government has neither sufficient resources nor infrastructure to respond to the immigration crisis that broke out this year, all the worse because the emigrants are not adults but children.

Children traveling alone, are on their own and at their own risk, or placed in the hands of mafias that take them, for a hefty price, to where their parents are. Many will fall into the hands of human trafficking mafias and will never reach their destination, even if they have paid. Others are not headed anywhere, they are simply running away from the horror of regions dominated by criminal gangs such as the Mara Salvatrucha, The Knights Templar or Los Zetas. This wave of migrant children comes mostly from Honduras, El Salvador, Guatemala and our very own Mexico. Many minors are traveling with the intention of crossing the well-fortified U.S. border in order to reunite with their parents. Others don't even have a destination, but are only running away from violence or from being recruited into the mafias of failed states in one of the countries that I mention here. These are minors whose parents and relatives have been murdered by mafias.

So far this year alone, Mexican authorities report that 45,000 unaccompanied migrant children have traveled from these four countries. Today, they find themselves detained at the American border and stuffed in shelters.

The crackdown by Obama's government and the U.S. Congress to halt the border crossings impedes many adults from visiting their families and children because it will be almost impossible for them to re-enter if they do not have papers. Some may casually think: So why do they go? I am certain that no one who has minimal living conditions leaves behind their children. It is hard to be an immigrant. In most cases, being an immigrant is heroic.

We must use all of our imagination and solidarity to form a solution that returns to these children, helplessly trapped in the cruel world of borders and international agreements, a "homeland." These children are abandoned to chance because of the indifference of those of us who do have a homeland, that is, those of us who have the luxury of being close to our loved ones and in a place where we can live and work in peace. Otherwise, where — as my dear sister asks in her blog this week — is the homeland?


A lo largo de la historia de la humanidad los seres humanos han migrado, las razones fundamentales eran las de encontrar mejores condiciones para sobrevivir, cuando la raza humana fue aprendiendo a cultivar la tierra, muchos grupos dejaron de ser nómadas y fueron creando comunidades más estables; sin embargo la migración ha continuado a los largo de miles de años y los motivos para desplazarse siguen siendo diversos.

Aunque nos fuimos volviendo sedentarios, vivimos miles de años sin el concepto de “patria” y siempre con la libertad de emigrar. Partiendo de la teoría de que la raza humana surgió en África del norte, la humanidad entera ha migrado de ahí para el resto del mundo. Casi todos estamos donde estamos por el producto de una migración. 

Uno de los derechos humanos es el “libre tránsito, migrar, irse, moverse”; obvio, con las restricciones que los acuerdos internacionales señalan, es decir, se puede uno mover de un país a otro dentro de los marcos jurídicos existentes. Por supuesto que ese marco jurídico tiene excepciones, y la principal es la del derecho a moverse por sobrevivencia y causas “humanitarias”.
En nuestro país apenas en 2011 se expidió la nueva “Ley de Migración”, y se le hicieron interesantísimas y avanzadas reformas en junio de 2013, quitándole al hecho de cruzar nuestro territorio sin papeles el carácter de “conducta delictiva” e incluyendo para los extranjeros el trato humanitario que nosotros mismos exigimos para nuestros connacionales cuando se van indocumentados para Estados Unidos, especialmente para niños, mujeres con niños y ancianos.
Hubo una buena medida de congruencia en esa ley y debe de felicitarse a la anterior legislatura por eso, en el Artículo 37-III apartado E, en el que se excusa de los requisitos para entrar al país a los solicitantes con condiciones de refugiados o por razones humanitarias, estipulando cuáles son esas condiciones y se establecen que será en las estaciones migratorias donde se les dará asistencia temporal mientras sus casos son revisados. Es un buen paso teórico, pero en la práctica las condiciones de quienes migran son pavorosas, pues el gobierno mexicano no cuenta con los recursos ni con la infraestructura suficiente para responder a la crisis migratoria desatada en este 2014, una de las peores porque los emigrantes emergentes no son adultos, sino niños.

Niños viajando solos, bajo su cuenta y riesgo, o puestos en manos de las mafias que los mueven para llevarlos, a cambio de un buen cobro, al lado de sus padres. Muchos caerán en las manos de las mafias de trata de personas y nunca llegarán a su destino aún cuando pagaron. Otros no van a ningún lado, solo huyen del horror de las zonas que dominan bandas delictivas, por ejemplo, los “mara salva truchas”, “Los Caballeros Templarios,” o “los zetas”. Esta ola de niños migrantes proviene básicamente de Honduras, Salvador, Guatemala y el mismo México. Muchos menores viajan con la intensión de cruzar la blindadísima frontera de los estados Unidos para reunirse con sus padres. Otros ni siquiera tienen destino, solo vienen huyendo de la violencia o el reclutamiento de las mafias generadas en los estados fallidos de algunos de los países que he mencionado. Menores cuyos padres y parientes han sido asesinados por esas mafias.

Solamente en este primer semestre, las autoridades mexicanas reportan el flujo de 45 mil niños y niñas de estos cuatro países viajando solos y hoy detenidos en la frontera americana, hacinados en albergues.
El endurecimiento de las medidas del gobierno de Obama y del congreso estadounidense para frenar el cruce de la frontera impide que muchos migrantes adultos visiten a sus familias e hijos pues les será casi imposible volver a entrar si no tienen papeles. Pensarán ligeramente algunos -¿Y para qué se van? Estoy seguro de que nadie que tenga unas mínimas buenas condiciones de vida se va dejando atrás a sus hijos. Ser migrante es muy duro. Ser migrante es heroico en la mayoría de los casos.

Tendremos que usar de toda nuestra imaginación y solidaridad para construir una solución que les devuelva una “patria” a estos niños atrapados sin remedio en la cruel realidad de las fronteras y los tratados internacionales de papel. Niños abandonados a su suerte ante la indiferencia de los que si tenemos patria, es decir, de los que tenemos el lujo de estar cerca de los seres que amamos o en un lugar en donde podemos vivir y trabajar en paz. ¿Dónde, si no, -como dice mi hermana querida en su blog de esta semana-, esta la patria?

veronicamilenio@yahoo.com.mx
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Japan: Trump Administration: Absurd Censorship

Thailand: Could Ukraine Actually End Up Winning?

Singapore: Trump’s Gaza Peace Plan – Some Cause for Optimism, but Will It Be Enough?

Canada: The Media Is Yielding to Trump: A MAGA Shift Is Underway

Singapore: US Visa Changes Could Spark a Global Talent Shift: Here’s Where Singapore Has an Edge

Topics

Austria: The Showdown in Washington Is about More Than the Budget

Singapore: Trump’s Gaza Peace Plan – Some Cause for Optimism, but Will It Be Enough?

Singapore: US Visa Changes Could Spark a Global Talent Shift: Here’s Where Singapore Has an Edge

Thailand: Could Ukraine Actually End Up Winning?

Thailand: Southeast Asia Amid the US-China Rift

Japan: Trump Administration: Absurd Censorship

Taiwan: Can Benefits from TikTok and Taiwan Be Evaluated the Same Way?

Related Articles

Cuba: Summit between Wars and Other Disruptions

Germany: LA Protests: Why Are So Many Mexican Flags Flying in the US?

Mexico: US Pushes for Submission

Mexico: The Trump Problem

Afghanistan: Defeat? Strategic Withdrawal? Maneuver?