Washington requires companies to comply with accounting standards. However, sanctions that make little difference and that harm the U.S. financial center will not pave the way to success.
What is the U.S. government trying to achieve by threatening to ban Chinese companies that do not comply with accounting standards from U.S. stock exchanges?
One could interpret the threat as a move to protect shareholders. However, this cannot be the reason, as Chinese companies listed on U.S. stock exchanges profit the most from professional investors. These investors have a professional obligation to know what they are getting themselves into when they spend money — and occasionally they succeed at this. What’s more, these professionals have not asked for help in analyzing the balance sheets of Chinese companies. They rely on their own instincts and on the auditor’s opinion.
Nor would a ban achieve a possible political goal of preventing Chinese companies from accessing U.S. capital. Capital may take tortuous paths before reaching its destination, but there are different options. Trading on alternative stock exchanges or in the private equity market would be just as simple.
Of course, Beijing could also simply allow auditors to look at the books. Nevertheless, sanctions that make little difference and that harm the U.S. financial center will not lead to success.
Sinnvoller Börsenbann von chinesischen Unternehmen? Washington verlangt die Einhaltung von Buchhaltungsstandards. Doch Sanktionen, die wenig bringen und dem amerikanischen Finanzplatz schaden, führen nicht weiter.
Was will die amerikanische Regierung mit der Drohung erreichen, chinesische Firmen von der Börse zu verbannen, wenn sie sich nicht den Buchhaltungsstandards unterwerfen? Man könnte das als Maßnahme zum Schutz der Aktionäre interpretieren. Doch die wichtigsten Geldgeber für die chinesischen Firmen an den Börsen sind professionelle Investoren.
Sie sind professionell verpflichtet, zu wissen, was sie tun, wenn sie Geld ausgeben. Und manchmal gelingt ihnen das auch. Sie haben zudem nicht laut um Hilfe in der Ergründung chinesischer Bilanzen gerufen. Sie verlassen sich auf ihren eigenen Spürsinn und auf das Testat der Wirtschaftsprüfer. Das mögliche politische Ziel, die Unternehmen von amerikanischem Kapital abzuschneiden, wird mit dem Vorstoß ebenfalls nicht erreicht.
Die Pfade, auf dem Kapital zu seinem Ziel gelangt, mögen verschlungen sein, sie sind aber real existierend. Verschiedene alternative Börsenplätze bieten sich ebenso an wie der Private-Equity-Beteiligungsmarkt. Natürlich könnte Peking auch schlicht Einsicht in die Buchhaltung gewähren. Aber Sanktionen, die wenig bringen und dem amerikanischen Finanzplatz schaden, führen nicht weiter.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link
.
Secretary Rubio’s ‘diplomatic masterstroke’ in Delhi unintentionally transformed political damage control into an involuntary roast of his own boss.
The Beijing summit did not produce a major agreement between the great powers on the region, but it firmly established that Middle Eastern crises are now deeply tied to the great-power dialogue.
The challenge for Washington is no longer whether it possesses sufficient capabilities, but whether the political system can align those capabilities behind a coherent long-term priority.
History has never witnessed a leader quite like Donald Trump — a mix of ignorance, arrogance immorality, brazenness, insensitivity and sheer stupidity.
The challenge for Washington is no longer whether it possesses sufficient capabilities, but whether the political system can align those capabilities behind a coherent long-term priority.
The Beijing summit did not produce a major agreement between the great powers on the region, but it firmly established that Middle Eastern crises are now deeply tied to the great-power dialogue.
History has never witnessed a leader quite like Donald Trump — a mix of ignorance, arrogance immorality, brazenness, insensitivity and sheer stupidity.
The challenge for Washington is no longer whether it possesses sufficient capabilities, but whether the political system can align those capabilities behind a coherent long-term priority.