Don’t Compromise Our Principles for American Nukes

Published in Tokyo Shimbun
(Japan) on 2 March 2022
by (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Joseph Santiago. Edited by Laurence Bouvard.
With Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, former Prime Minister Shinzo Abe suggested that American nuclear weapons be stationed in Japan and for there to be a nuclear-sharing agreement between the two countries. As the only country to fall victim to nuclear weapons, Japan’s three non-nuclear principles — stating that nuclear arms shall never be held, used or introduced — have been national policy for decades. One cannot be so rash as to go against the path post-war Japan has taken.

On Feb. 28 during a TV interview, while referring to the nuclear-sharing program between the United States and member-nations of NATO, Abe said, “We mustn't view it as taboo to debate how the world is being protected.” Under this program, America houses nuclear arms in non-nuclear countries such as Germany, the Netherlands and Italy, and makes the decision on whether to use them, while the host country only provides the machinery needed for transport.

What Abe really wants to say is that Japan, a country surrounded by nuclear powers, must hold nuclear weapons to be safe itself. However, in addition to Japan’s own non-nuclear principles, agreements such as the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons or the Atomic Energy Basic Law would likely be violated. Unlike Japan’s current situation, the sharing program in Europe was in place before the NPT came into effect in 1970.

Fighting fire with fire just doesn’t make sense for a country like Japan, which bears the scars of nuclear weapons and aims to abolish them entirely one day. Atomic bomb victims have recently criticized Russian President Vladimir Putin for his apparent willingness to utilize nuclear weapons, warning him, “You will never be forgiven.” It’s a given that, as prime minister, Fumio Kishida reaffirmed Japan’s dedication to its three principles while rejecting any sharing program.

The Japanese government continues to debate how to best preserve national security. While strategies must be revised as the international situation develops, we can't seriously consider offhandedly advocating for a military buildup and housing of nuclear weapons on the heels of the invasion of Ukraine. Japan’s entry into the nuclear race would only increase competition, giving others a reason to launch a nuclear strike on us. What’s needed now is to stick to our three principles and choose the path of peace. What we need most is thoughtful, rational debate.


<社説>核共有発言 非核三原則否定するな

ロシアのウクライナ侵攻を受けて、安倍晋三元首相が米国保有の核兵器を日本に配備して日米が共同運用する「核共有」についても議論するよう呼び掛けた。
 唯一の戦争被爆国である日本は核兵器を「持たず、作らず、持ち込ませず」の非核三原則を国是としてきた。戦後日本の歩みを否定する軽率な発言は慎むべきだ。
 安倍氏は二月二十七日、民放の報道番組で、米国と北大西洋条約機構(NATO)一部加盟国との核共有に言及し、「世界の安全がどのように守られているのかという現実の議論をタブー視してはならない」と述べた。
 米国とNATOとの核共有は、米国が非核兵器国のドイツ、オランダ、イタリアなどに核兵器を配備し、使用決定権は米国自身が持ち、非核兵器国は戦闘機での運搬に加わる内容だ。
 安倍氏の発言の背景には、核保有国に囲まれた日本の安全を守るには、日本への核兵器配備が必要との判断があるのだろう。
 しかし、日本の核共有は非核三原則に加え、非核兵器国の核兵器受領を禁じた核拡散防止条約(NPT)や原子力の平和利用を定めた原子力基本法に違反する可能性が高い。欧州での核共有は一九七〇年のNPT発効以前から続いており、日本とは事情が異なる。
 核には核で対抗する姿勢は被爆国の国民感情や、核廃絶を目指す日本の立場と相いれない。核兵器使用も辞さない姿勢を示すロシアのプーチン大統領には、被爆者らが「断じて許されない」と非難の声を上げた。
 岸田文雄首相が非核三原則の堅持を表明し、核共有を否定したのは、日本の首相として当然だ。
 政府は国家安全保障戦略の改定に向けた論議を進める。国際情勢の変化に応じた戦略見直しの必要性は否定しないが、ウクライナ侵攻に乗じた安易な核共有や軍備増強を認めるわけにはいかない。
 日本が核共有すれば、核軍拡競争をあおり、核攻撃の口実を与えることになる。今必要なことは、非核三原則を含む「平和国家」の歩みをより強固にすることではないか。冷静な議論を望みたい。
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Saudi Arabia: US Voters Care about the Rent, Not the War

Australia: Will Trump’s Midterms Wipe-Out Hit Australia’s Already Shaky Economy?

Canada: Fixing the Wreckage Donald Trump Has Made of the World

South Africa: ‘America First’ in Africa: Coltan and Cash for Condoms and the ‘El Chapos’

United Arab Emirates: Strengths and Weaknesses in the US

Topics

Spain: Punishment for Trump, Victory for Democracy

China: Four ‘Surprises’ in the US Midterm Elections

Egypt: Trump Is Drowning in the Blue Flood

India: Beyond the Blue Wave: American Voters Deliver the Reset the World Was Waiting for

Israel: US Election Results Send 1 Clear Message to Israeli Politics

Saudi Arabia: US Voters Care about the Rent, Not the War

Kenya: Lessons from US Midterm Elections: What Young Africans Can Learn

United Arab Emirates: Strengths and Weaknesses in the US

Related Articles

Japan: US Military Must Not Be Allowed To Hide Source of PFAS Contamination

Germany: Europe Can’t Leave Ukraine to Trump*

Italy: President Trump and the Other Crocodiles

Taiwan: Betrayed by Trump, Ukraine Was Once a ‘City upon a Hill’

Germany: Trump Remains Putin’s Best Helper

Previous article
Next article