The San Francisco Board of Supervisors has decided to change the name of the street that has been named after Lech Walesa since 1986. The reasons are homophobic statements made by the former Solidarity leader and president of the Republic of Poland.
Legendary singer Joan Baez took part in the event of naming the street after Lech Walesa in 1986.
However, last year the Board of Supervisors found out about the famous statement of the former president, who said that gays have too many privileges and suggested that they should be forced to sit behind a wall in the Polish parliament.
The supervisors of gay-friendly San Francisco unanimously accepted Jane Kim's proposal to change the street name, which as of today is named after doctor and gay activist Tom Waddell, who died in 1987.
The initiator of the change, Supervisor Jane Kim, claims that the Board of Supervisors does not aim to detract from the political achievements of the former Solidarity leader, but that his statements are contrary to values that are important to San Francisco.
Rada miasta San Francisco zdecydowała o zmianie nazwy ulicy, która od 1986 roku nosiła imię Lecha Wałęsy. Przyczyną są homofobiczne wypowiedzi byłego przywódcy Solidarności i prezydenta RP.
W uroczystości nadania ulicy imienia Lecha Wałęsy w 1986 roku wzięła udział miejscowa Polonia oraz legendarna pieśniarka Joan Baez.
W ubiegłym roku jednak do rady miasta dotarła słynna wypowiedź byłego prezydenta, w której twierdzi, że geje mają zbyt wiele przywilejów, a w polskim Sejmie powinni siedzieć za murem.
Radni San Francisco, miasta gejom przyjaznego, na wniosek Jane Kim jednogłośnie przyjęli wniosek o zmianie nazwy uliczki, która od dziś nosi imię Toma Waddella, zmarłego w 1987 roku lekarza i działacza gejowskiego.
Inicjatorka zmiany, radna Jane Kim twierdzi, że rada miasta nie miała na celu pomniejszenie politycznych osiągnięć byłego przywódcy Solidarności, ale że jego wypowiedzi są sprzeczne z wartościami cennymi dla San Francisco.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link
.
A summit that would normally send a reassuring message ... faces total uncertainty thanks to the weakness of the United States. The only person to blame for this is Trump.
The Beijing summit did not produce a major agreement between the great powers on the region, but it firmly established that Middle Eastern crises are now deeply tied to the great-power dialogue.
The Beijing summit did not produce a major agreement between the great powers on the region, but it firmly established that Middle Eastern crises are now deeply tied to the great-power dialogue.
During the Cold War, the United States occupied the apex of this triangular dynamic, pitting China and the USSR against each other. Today, it is Beijing that occupies that apex.
A summit that would normally send a reassuring message ... faces total uncertainty thanks to the weakness of the United States. The only person to blame for this is Trump.