Russian leader Vladimir Putin recently signed a number of cooperative agreements with China amid ongoing political and economic tension. The news comes after President Donald Trump and other world leaders made the final stop of their international tour in Beijing, the new center of the world.
Yet, the latest meeting between Russia and China was not all sunshine and rainbows. Neither was the one between Trump and Chinese leader Xi Jinping. China may have agreed to economic collaboration, but this does not extend to military support, as it is unwilling to enter a war.
Every world leader knows what’s going on: America is losing its grip on global power. They also know that a weakening of the U.S. dollar could catalyze an unprecedented global economic crisis. No nation understands this better than China, which is why it is resisting violence for as long as possible to avoid incurring substantial damage to its export revenue.
America’s strength is also its weakness. Devaluation of the dollar as a currency exchange mechanism forces the U.S. to increase its national debt — this number now exceeds $39 trillion, as some of its allies move away from dealing in American currency. The star-spangled banner is entering dangerous territory.
China refused to sign business agreements with Russia, particularly in relation to oil and gas; these would have created dependency on China's northern neighbor as a sole energy supplier. Xi and Putin are acting like a married couple that refuse to sleep in the same bed. Nevertheless, unlike the meeting with Trump, it was more than just a load of hot air.
In a single generation, we have watched China evolve from being seen as a producer of "knockoff" goods to establishing itself as the global leader in manufacturing. Many of its brands now dominate international markets. At the same time, the U.S. has abandoned manufacturing, importing increasingly more products from China as a result. The same is happening in Europe, too: American goods now barely get a look-see on a continent that was once accustomed to U.S. commercial hegemony.
How did we get here? To answer this question, we can analyze the 81 years that have passed since the U.S. ascended to the international throne at the end of World War II.
At the end of the 19th century, Great Britain’s grip on global power was slipping, with America gaining momentum. Europeans were debating the principles of social democracy but, in the end, it was a Russian variant that contaminated the world and seized control.
El líder ruso Vladimir Putin acaba de lograr varios acuerdos de cooperación con China en medio de tensiones políticas y económicas y tras las recientes visitas del presidente estadounidense y otros líderes para completar la temporada de visitas primaverales a Pekín, el nuevo epicentro mundial.
Sin embargo, este encuentro no fue de miel sobre hojuelas, como tampoco lo fue entre Xi Jinping y Donald Trump. China suscribe acuerdos de colaboración económicos, pero elude la parte militar porque no quiere involucrarse en una guerra.
Todos los líderes mundiales saben qué está pasando: Estados Unidos pierde influencia y saben que la debilidad del dólar significa acelerar una catástrofe económica mundial de consecuencias imprevisibles. China es la primera en saberlo por eso busca alargar el proceso sin violencia y así evita oleajes negativos para las exportaciones.
La fortaleza de USA es también su debilidad. La disminución del dólar como instrumento de intercambio empuja a ese país al aumento del endeudamiento interno, que ya sobrepasa los 39 billones de dólares mientras algunos aliados eluden la moneda del Tío Sam. Son vientos que llevan la barca de barras y estrellas por mar encrespado.
China evita suscribir acuerdos de negocios con Rusia, sobre todo petróleo y gas, que la tornen dependiente de un solo suplidor. Juntos, pero durmiendo en camas separadas, sin embargo, no fue un encuentro de blablablá como con Trump.
Esta generación ha vivido la transición de China de elaborar productos “carabelitas” a fábrica del mundo y ascender a fabricante de productos propios líderes en el mercado mundial. Mientras, Estados Unidos abandonó la manufactura y aumentó las importaciones desde el gigante asiático. Así le ocurre a Europa que se acostumbró a la tutela estadounidense y casi no cuenta.
Los 81 años transcurridos desde el ascenso de USA al liderato mundial sirven para analizar qué ha pasado y por qué estamos aquí. A finales de 1800 Gran Bretaña dominaba precariamente el mundo y Estados Unidos estaba en ascenso. En Europa se debatían las ideas socialdemócratas y una versión rusa contaminó el mundo y tomó el poder.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link
.
A summit that would normally send a reassuring message ... faces total uncertainty thanks to the weakness of the United States. The only person to blame for this is Trump.
History has never witnessed a leader quite like Donald Trump — a mix of ignorance, arrogance immorality, brazenness, insensitivity and sheer stupidity.
The challenge for Washington is no longer whether it possesses sufficient capabilities, but whether the political system can align those capabilities behind a coherent long-term priority.
The Beijing summit did not produce a major agreement between the great powers on the region, but it firmly established that Middle Eastern crises are now deeply tied to the great-power dialogue.
The challenge for Washington is no longer whether it possesses sufficient capabilities, but whether the political system can align those capabilities behind a coherent long-term priority.
The Beijing summit did not produce a major agreement between the great powers on the region, but it firmly established that Middle Eastern crises are now deeply tied to the great-power dialogue.