Wealthy Americans Thinking about Suicide

Published in Sohu
(China) on 5 August 2010
by Guo Songmin (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Qiuming Liao. Edited by Gheanna Emelia.
The U.S. stopped imposing the inheritance tax for one year starting from Jan. 1 this year. That means that those dying wealthy Americans can avoid the heavy tax with the tax rate as high as 45 percent, as long as they are still alive after Jan. 1 this year. However, it might end very soon. If Congress does not take any actions, the inheritance tax will return. Some rich people are thinking about committing suicide before the end of 2010 to catch the last chance of this free tax, in order to let the family get a bigger share of an inheritance (August 3, Guangzhou Daily).

There is a paradoxical impression of America in many Chinese people’s minds: it seems as if America is the paradise of the rich. However, just by looking at the inheritance tax, this “paradise” is relentless enough — when you die, almost half of your property will be taken away by the government with no mercy. This is simply worse than gun robbery. The wealthy Americans have been calling for abolishing the inheritance tax, because they think that this tax will force rich people to leave the U.S. and immigrate to other countries. Although the former U.S. President Bush expended a tremendous effort, he only managed to get this one year of “tax-exempt window period.” He did not expect that this would get the rich people who are either old or sick into Hamlet-like trouble. An 80-year-old rich man said: “You just don’t know what to do, whether to kill yourself or continue to live.” A lawyer was concerned that heirs might attempt to unplug their dying relatives’ oxygen.

From this, I thought of the Chinese media playing up the topic of “the third emigration trend of the wealthy” recently. Although there are articles talking about it at great length, they can be summarized into one sentence: China is not treating rich people well enough, and that is why they have left and therefore caused the loss of wealth and elites, while America is undoubtedly the main destination of the “emigration trend.” However, this news about America’s inheritance tax made me realize that the so-called emigration trend of the wealthy (if it does exist) is, I am afraid, only a “blindness trend,” because America does not treat rich people better than China. At least, China does not have an inheritance tax! It is like having escaped one trap only to fall into another. So what is the point? It seems to me that emigrating to the moon is the best option for the safety of rich people’s wealth. There are neither groups who hate the rich, nor the inheritance tax. It can be considered a true paradise of the rich.

If America is not the paradise of rich people, then considering the so-called emigration trend of the wealthy is likely some kind of strategy, grumbling, and even a threat, with a purpose of fighting for more privileges for rich people. However, aren’t there enough privileges for rich people in China? It is reported that a lot of places set up “super-national treatment” for “investors” (they are rich people, of course). Rich people enjoy all kinds of privileges…so how do you make them feel that China is “livable”? Do they really need to be crowned and enjoy hereditary privileges?

It seems that we really need to learn from America on the issue of how to treat rich people. Although the U.S. is accused of “encouraging death” by some American media, the Congress does not seem to care, with no intention of changing the policy of restoring the inheritance tax. China should also introduce taxes that can adjust the gap between the rich and the poor as soon as possible, such as the inheritance tax, the gift tax, etc. Taking into account the current circumstances in China, China should also introduce the emigration tax. The rich people and officials, who leave China to emigrate to other countries, have to pay the emigration tax, with a tax rate of more than 70 percent of the total property. It is not revenge by taking such measures. It is to prevent the wealth created by hard-working Chinese people from being taken overseas by these “huge rats.” Meanwhile, it is also to realize the solemn commitment of “mutual help and mutual well-being” — in my opinion, mutual well-being is the only effective way to stop the “emigration trend” and retain the wealth and talents.


从美国富豪“考虑自杀”谈起
来源:国际在线 作者:郭松民
2010年08月05日08:51
 美国自今年1月1日起暂停征收一年遗产税。这意味着,那些生命垂危的美国富人只要活过今年1月1日,就能让自己的继承人免缴税率高达45%的重税。但这样的好日子或许很快就会结束,如果国会不采取行动,遗产税将在2011年卷土重来。一些富人为了让亲人分得更多遗产,正考虑抢在2010年年底之前自杀,从而搭上“免税末班车”(8月3日《广州日报》)。

  在中国许多人的脑海里,对美国存在着一种似是而非的印象:似乎美国是富人的天堂。但至少从遗产税这个指标看,这所“天堂”对富人是够狠的———只要你一闭眼,差不多一半左右财产就被政府毫不客气地拿走了,简直比持枪抢劫还要厉害。美国的富人一直在鼓噪要取消遗产税,认为这个税种会迫使美国富人移民离开美国,但美国前总统小布什费了九牛二虎之力,也只不过为富人争得了一年的“免税空窗期”,而更令他没有想到的是,这居然会让那些年迈或多病的富豪陷入了一种哈姆雷特式的困境。一位八旬富豪说:“你不知道该自杀,还是该继续生活。”而一位律师则担心,继承人可能试图在今年12月31日之前“拔下亲人的氧气插头”。

  由此我想到,这段时间中国的媒体一直在炒作“第三波富人移民潮”的话题,虽然许多文章写得洋洋洒洒,煞有介事,但归纳起来无非也就一句话:中国对富人还不够好,所以他们走了,并由此造成了财富和精英的流失,而美国则无疑是“移民潮”的主要彼岸。不过这条关于美国“遗产税”的新闻让我意识到,所谓“富人移民潮”(如果真的存在的话)恐怕不过是一股“盲目潮”,因为美国对富人更不客气,中国至少还没有“遗产税”嘛!如果中国对富人来说是“狼窝”的话,那美国对富人就是“虎口”了———逃离“狼窝”,再入“虎口”,这又何必呢?我看为了富人的财富安全计,移民到月亮上才是最合适的,那里既没有仇富的人群,也没有遗产税,堪称真正的富人天堂。

  如果就连美国也并非富人天堂的话,那么炒作所谓中国“富人移民潮”,很可能就是一种策略,是一种撒娇,甚至要挟了,目的则是为了替富人争取更多的特权。但中国富人的特权难道还不够多吗?据报道,这些年来,许多地方都为“投资者”(当然是富人)设置了许多“超国民待遇”,富人们享有各种各样的特权……他们究竟要怎样才能感觉到“宜居”,难道非要给他们封王封侯,世袭罔替吗?

  看来在如何对待富人的问题上,我们还真的不妨向美国学习。虽然有一些美国媒体指责美国国会正在“激励死亡”,但国会似乎毫不在意,并不打算改变在今年12月31日后恢复遗产税的政策。中国也应该尽速开征“遗产税”、“赠与税”等具有调节贫富差距功能税种,考虑到中国的具体情况,还应该开征“移民税”,即凡是试图以移民他国的方式离开中国的富人、官员,都必须交移民税,税率可以占其全部财产的70%以上。采取这样的措施不是为了报复,而是为了防止中国人民胼手砥足创造的财富被这些硕鼠带往海外,同时也是为了履行改革开放之初“先富带后富,最终实现共同富裕”的庄严承诺———在我看来,共同富裕才是遏制所谓“移民潮”,防止财富和人才流失的唯一有效举措,舍此别无他途。
(责任编辑:Hengxiaojing)

This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Mexico: The Trump Problem

Switzerland: Donald Trump: 100 Days Already, but How Many Years?

     

Austria: Donald Trump Revives the Liberals in Canada

Russia: Political Analyst Reveals the Real Reason behind US Tariffs*

Germany: Absolute Arbitrariness

Topics

Mexico: EU: Concern for the Press

Austria: Musk, the Man of Scorched Earth

Germany: Cynicism, Incompetence and Megalomania

Switzerland: Donald Trump: 100 Days Already, but How Many Years?

     

Austria: Donald Trump Revives the Liberals in Canada

Germany: Absolute Arbitrariness

Israel: Trump’s National Security Adviser Forgot To Leave Personal Agenda at Home and Fell

Mexico: The Trump Problem

Related Articles

Mexico: The Trump Problem

Taiwan: Making America Great Again and Taiwan’s Crucial Choice

Venezuela: Vietnam: An Outlet for China

Germany: US Companies in Tariff Crisis: Planning Impossible, Price Increases Necessary

Hong Kong: Can US Tariffs Targeting Hong Kong’s ‘Very Survival’ Really Choke the Life out of It?