America Has Been Kidnapped by “Human Rights”

Published in Xinhua
(China) on 12 April 2011
by Huang Shejiao (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by John Phillips. Edited by Heidi Kaufmann.
The U.S. State Department recently published its annual “Country Reports on Human Rights Practices” for the year 2010. The section related to China once again attacked human rights conditions in China. China has harshly refuted this and also expressed that the Chinese and American governments have huge differences on the issue of human rights. It hopes that discussions on this topic can be held, based on equality and mutual respect; however, it will strongly oppose any interference in China’s internal affairs.

Traditionally, America has not cared to listen to opposing arguments on the topic of human rights but, rather, enjoys sending out one-sided comments about human rights issues in other countries. This causes America’s foreign relations with other nations (even its allies) to become tense. In its own “2010 American Human Rights Record,” China politely advised America to reflect on its own human rights problems and to remember that just because America has proclaimed itself “the lord of human rights” does not mean that it can see its own issues clearly.

This year America launched a campaign for human rights. What are the characteristics of this “campaign”?

First of all, this campaign is to help Obama gain some steam for his re-election bid. On April 4, Obama announced that he would seek re-election in 2012. With this decided, he needed to start developing some much-needed political bargaining chips. On the one hand, he began the “prudent” military action in Libya, where the U.S. has secretly sent Special Forces to train the rebel forces; and on the other hand, he started nagging other countries about the same old issue of human rights, claiming that he is showing “concern.” This is a demonstration of Obama’s strength, but in reality, it is nothing more than a way to strengthen his bid for re-election.

Something that is even more worth the public’s attention is that America’s actions this year have shown that it is even more determined to step up the campaign for human rights. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton expanded on the meaning of “human rights” during a speech. She said that suppressing civil groups and activists, restricting the Internet and discriminating against gays and lesbians give her cause for concern. According to her, a sovereign nation’s government suppressing anti-government organizations and conspirators is a “crackdown on civil society activists,” and restricting Internet access from those who would destroy the nation’s stability and spread pornographic filth and terrorist messages is a violation of “freedoms of expression.” It is not hard to see that the friction between developing and U.S.-led Western countries will only increase and that the contradictions will continue to become even more apparent. For example, in many nations homosexuality is not recognized. In Cameroon, when homosexuals are discovered, they are sent to prison. In January of this year, the European Union openly opposed the government of Cameroon by giving 300,000 euros to an anti-government organization that protects gay rights, encouraging homosexuals to oppose their government.

Actually, America clearly understands that the ethnicities, religions, cultures, laws and societal systems of each nation are totally different; customs and thought patterns are also different. So, when it forces other nations to be measured by America’s standards, it is deliberately doing something that it knows is wrong, and it loves it. As soon as America hears that another nation has so-called human rights issues, it gets excited. Government officials and even presidents get a chance to respond to this news. In order to obtain votes, politicians will use all of their energy to put on a show for their constituents. This type of response proves precisely that the American government and president have been kidnapped by their own philosophies of democracy and human rights. If America does not do any self-reflection on human rights, then I’m afraid that the friction caused by this issue will not be easily mitigated.


美国国务院日前发表《2010年度国别人权报告》,涉华部分再次攻击中国人权状况。对此,中方已作出严厉的驳斥,同时表示中美在人权问题上有分歧,我们愿在平等和相互尊重的基础上就人权问题开展对话,但坚决反对借人权问题干涉中国内政。
  对于人权问题,美国历来不顾别国的反对,总喜欢单方面对别国人权说三道四。因此引起美国与其他国家,甚至盟友的外交关系紧张。所以,中方客气地奉劝美方多反省自己的人权问题,不要以“人权教师爷自居”。为帮助其认清自己的问题,中国公布了《2010年美国的人权记录》。
  那么,美国今年发动人权战有何特点?
  首先,为美国总统奥巴马竞选连任加分。奥巴马于本月4日正式宣布参加2012年总统大选,谋求连任。这就决定其需要积累一些必要的政治筹码:一方面,美在利比亚“谨慎”实施军事行动,暗中派特种部队训练利叛乱分子,另一方面,重新祭出“人权”的老皇历,对别国人权状况力表“关心”,以此显示强硬,从而为自己的竞选加分。
  更值得注意的是,从今年情况看,美国似乎决心加大打“人权战”的力度。国务卿希拉里•克林顿在讲话中扩大“人权”的内涵,说“大肆镇压公民社会团体和活动分子”、“限制网络”以及“歧视男女同性恋者”三种倾向,令其“担忧”。按她的意思,一个主权国家的政府镇压反政府组织和阴谋者就是“镇压公民社会团体和活动分子”,限制利用网络破坏国家稳定以及传播黄色淫秽和恐怖信息就是违反言论自由。从中不难预见,以美国为首的西方国家在人权问题上同发展中国家的摩擦只能有增无减,矛盾将更加突出。例如,同性恋在许多国家是不认可的,在非洲喀麦隆,同性恋者一经发现,就会被判处入狱或罚款。可是今年1月,欧盟公然与喀麦隆政府唱对台戏,资助喀一个捍卫同性恋者权利的非政府组织30万欧元,鼓励同性恋者与政府对抗。
其实,美国明明知道世界各国的民族、宗教、文化、法律、社会制度迥异,风俗习惯、思维模式各不相同,却明知故犯,非要以美国的标准去衡量,且“乐此不疲”。一听说别国有所谓违反人权的事就“激动”,政府高官、政要甚至总统都纷纷作出反应。而政治人物为了获得选票,更是卖力地表演。他们的这种反应恰恰证明美国政府、总统已被自己鼓吹的民主、人权理念所“绑架”。因此,只要美国自身对此不作出反省,人权摩擦就不会轻易打住。
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Taiwan: Making America Great Again and Taiwan’s Crucial Choice

Venezuela: Vietnam: An Outlet for China

Austria: Musk, the Man of Scorched Earth

Germany: Cynicism, Incompetence and Megalomania

Austria: Donald Trump Revives the Liberals in Canada

Topics

Mexico: EU: Concern for the Press

Austria: Musk, the Man of Scorched Earth

Germany: Cynicism, Incompetence and Megalomania

Switzerland: Donald Trump: 100 Days Already, but How Many Years?

     

Austria: Donald Trump Revives the Liberals in Canada

Germany: Absolute Arbitrariness

Israel: Trump’s National Security Adviser Forgot To Leave Personal Agenda at Home and Fell

Mexico: The Trump Problem

Related Articles

Mexico: The Trump Problem

Taiwan: Making America Great Again and Taiwan’s Crucial Choice

Venezuela: Vietnam: An Outlet for China

Germany: US Companies in Tariff Crisis: Planning Impossible, Price Increases Necessary

Hong Kong: Can US Tariffs Targeting Hong Kong’s ‘Very Survival’ Really Choke the Life out of It?