America Shows North Korea Its Strength

Published in Huanqiu
(China) on 9 April 2013
by Li Jie (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Bion Johnson. Edited by Natalie Clager.
The U.S. has issued a fierce warning to North Korea following the former’s March joint military exercises with South Korean forces. The two countries have decided to continue the exercises in April. Before this, the U.S. had already dispatched B-52 strategic bombers, B-2 stealth bombers, F-22 stealth fighters and the nuclear-powered Cheyenne submarine to South Korea, along with other advanced weaponry. Perhaps the U.S. thought this was still insufficient, because in the past two days America has deployed specialized guided missile defense radar systems on the Korean coast — with a supposed detection distance of 4,800 kilometers — along with two warships equipped with anti-guided missile defense systems. If one adds to the equation Burke-class, guided missile-equipped destroyers, high-altitude deployment early warning aircraft, satellites with photo resolutions of 0.1 to 0.15 meters, unmanned surveillance aircraft, underwater spy systems, etc., it can be said that North Korea has been wrapped up so tight that even a drop of water cannot escape.

Thus, the U.S., with great fanfare and bombast, deploys around North Korea the most sophisticated weapons technology and comprehensive, three-dimensional surveillance and spy equipment in the world. America has adopted a position of war-at-moment’s notice with its response to North Korea, which has purpose beyond merely responding to the North’s nuclear weapons development program and affirming its staunch military support of South Korea. I’m afraid that America has additional motives in this response.

First, this response is to give the impression to the U.S. Congress, the public and the news media that, now and into the future, all parts of the world are unsafe, especially with the imminent Iran and North Korea nuclear weapon crises. Right now Congress is considering cutting the U.S. military’s budget, specifically with the automatic spending cuts in place. Just in the fiscal year 2013, the U.S. is looking at cutting the military budget by $46 billion, putting the military in a place where it’s unmanageably strapped for cash. It’s no wonder why U.S. Secretary of Defense Hagel on April 3 exhorted Congress to address the automatic spending cuts and increase the military’s budget — or at least not let it be reduced any further.

Second, the U.S. is to proceed with its Asia-Pacific strategic rebalancing and systematic deployment of its ever-evolving military — to deploy and test its newest military capabilities in as wide an array of contexts as possible, as well as to monitor its opponent’s own weapons capabilities, combat style and communications efficacy. One could say that the U.S. is using the present crises and every related event as an excuse not only to turn the Korean Peninsula into a showroom for its war machine but also a testing ground.

Third, the United States' large-scale withdrawal from Afghanistan gets closer every day; when this happens, several tens of thousands of soldiers will be reassigned from the region. For this reason America has committed itself to a lofty tone with regard to North Korea’s nuclear missile program so that it has a tenable excuse to give the masses when it finds a new home for those soldiers in bases close to North Korea.

Moreover, by going to such great lengths to show off its most advanced arsenal, the U.S. markets its second and third-tier weapons that are for sale to its buddies. Although the U.S. has clearly and publicly made its fierce threats, and furthermore made a show of strength as a warning, and in public takes on North Korea directly and forcefully, its deeper intention is finding an excuse to establish its military power in the Pacific and send a message to China, Russia and other such countries: America is still the strongest military power in the world and has the most authority to address North Korea’s nuclear missile program.


香港《大公报》4月9日文章 原题:美对朝出狠招放狠话 继美韩3月份秃鹫和关键决断两场军事演习之后,两国又决定于4月份再接连举行4场联合军演;此前,美已先后向韩派遣了B-52战略轰炸机、B-2隐形轰炸机、F-22隐形战斗机、夏延号核潜艇等多种最先进的武器。也许觉得这还不够,于是近日美国还紧急向朝鲜海岸派遣了专门用于探测弹道导弹的X波段海基雷达(其探测距离据称可达4800公里),以及两艘具有导弹防御能力的阿利.伯克级导弹驱逐舰;倘若加上其远在高空数百公里以上部署、分辨率高达0.1-0.15米的高级锁眼侦察卫星和预警机、无人侦察机、水下监视系统等,真可谓把朝鲜包围个密不透风、水泄不通。

  美如此高调对朝派遣动用最先进的武器,对其实施全方位、立体的探测与监视,并摆出一副严厉应对、随时交战的架势,恐怕绝不仅是为了应对朝鲜发展核武器,给其韩国这个盟友以坚定的支持,恐怕还有诸多难以示外的内情:首先,是为了向美国国会、民众及舆论媒体表明,当前乃至今后世界各地并不太平,尤其是伊朗、朝鲜核危机迫在眉睫、危在旦夕,而此时国会竟然还要削减军费,特别是启动自动减赤机制,仅2013财政年度就要砍掉大约460亿美元,这对本来军费就捉襟见肘的美国军队来说,实在有点吃不消。无怪乎,美国防长哈格尔4月3日也提出要求自动降薪,急欲作出一种强烈的姿态,以确保今后国会在审批计划与申请时,军费能有所增加,至少不再降低。

  其次,是为了继续贯彻其重返亚太和再平衡战略的需求,而不断、有序地进行调兵遣将、排兵布阵,试验和检验各种最新武器装备在未来战场上的使用情况,以及探测监视作战对手武器装备的战技术性能、作战样式、指挥通信手段等。可以说,借着这次危机事件及各种演习,美军不仅把朝鲜半岛当作多种先进武器的展示场,而且一旦可能或需要就把它变为试验场。

  其三,随着美军从阿富汗大规模撤军日益临近,未来将有数万人马要安排退路。为此,通过拉高调门,展现朝核危机的危险性和复杂性,对韩国、美国及其民众来说,都是一个极好的理由与解释,足可为安置这些从阿富汗移防出来的大批美军,找到一个可以安身,且理由非常充分的好去处。

  此外,通过大量各种最新武器装备的演示与亮相,也可以借机把自己军火库中的二三流武器装备兜售给哥们儿,捞取外快。美国虽然明着对朝鲜出狠招、放狠话,但实质上还有敲山震虎之意,即公开层面上是直接对着朝鲜,而深层次还有把最新兵力兵器轮番投放到东亚最前沿,也想给中、俄等国一个警示,它的潜台词是:美国依然是世界头号军事强国,在朝核危机处置上仍有很大的发言权。(作者为三略研究院海洋问题研究中心首席专家)
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Mexico: EU: Concern for the Press

Mexico: The Trump Problem

Taiwan: Making America Great Again and Taiwan’s Crucial Choice

Russia: Political Analyst Reveals the Real Reason behind US Tariffs*

Germany: Absolute Arbitrariness

Topics

Mexico: EU: Concern for the Press

Austria: Musk, the Man of Scorched Earth

Germany: Cynicism, Incompetence and Megalomania

Switzerland: Donald Trump: 100 Days Already, but How Many Years?

     

Austria: Donald Trump Revives the Liberals in Canada

Germany: Absolute Arbitrariness

Israel: Trump’s National Security Adviser Forgot To Leave Personal Agenda at Home and Fell

Mexico: The Trump Problem

Related Articles

Mexico: The Trump Problem

Taiwan: Making America Great Again and Taiwan’s Crucial Choice

Venezuela: Vietnam: An Outlet for China

Germany: US Companies in Tariff Crisis: Planning Impossible, Price Increases Necessary

Hong Kong: Can US Tariffs Targeting Hong Kong’s ‘Very Survival’ Really Choke the Life out of It?