Hard To Understand

Published in La Jornada
(Mexico) on 1 September 2016
by Editorial (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Tom Walker. Edited by Melanie Rehfuss.
From its announcement less than 24 hours before the event, U.S. Republican Party presidential candidate Donald Trump’s surprise meeting with President Enrique Peña Nieto caused undeniable public agitation and almost unanimous alarm in the country. Such reactions certainly have to do with the consistent aggression against Mexico and Mexicans with which Trump has sought to attract reactionary, racist and xenophobic voters who, unfortunately, are numerous in his country. Attacks like these have been converted almost into a symbol of the Republican candidate’s crude, antagonistic and provocative spirit and have turned him into an unacceptable figure, certainly in Mexico but also among many U.S. citizens and in the eyes of the world.

But beyond Trump’s unacceptable positions, the invitation to the two U.S. presidential hopefuls – taken up immediately by the Republican but to which Democrat Hillary Clinton has not yet responded – is an unusual gesture that is hard to understand. It puts Mexico and its government in the middle of the U.S. election battle and makes it an issue in the presidential race north of the Rio Grande.

Standing with his inconvenient guest at their joint appearance, Peña Nieto took an undeniably firm stand in defense of Mexicans living in the United States and stressed the importance of a bilateral relationship based on dialogue and not on confrontation. But the negative implications of the meeting far outweigh the benefits.

In fact, the consequences of this risky gamble were evident since before the meeting between Peña Nieto and Trump was organized: Trump was able to capitalize on the trip – since he set up the meeting – in order to soften the effects of his anti-Mexican tirades without, in the process, alienating the supporters that he attracted by taking that stand. Because, after all, Trump has never done business in Mexico, he has never budged an inch on his delusional idea of building a wall along the entire border, and there has never been the slightest hint of an apology for all the insults spewed out on Mexico and its leaders over the past year.

In contrast, the incursion of the White House into the contest was a sign to our country’s president of a new wave of critics on the domestic side and the real danger that his meeting with the Republican candidate may be seen by U.S. Democrats as an endorsement from outside the country at a time when Trump is falling in the polls. That perception could have extremely negative consequences for the presidency and for the country as a whole if Clinton should decide not to accept the invitation and especially if she wins the election in November. In short, the Mexican president has paid a very high price for this meeting and he has created a space in which diplomatic complications could develop with our neighbor to the north, which under the present circumstances is the last thing our country and its government needs.


Difícil de entender

La jornada (México)
Editorial
1 de septiembre de 2016

La sorpresiva visita del candidato presidencial republicano de Estados Unidos, Donald Trump, al presidente Enrique Peña Nieto causó desde su anuncio, menos de 24 horas antes, un inocultable malestar en la sociedad y un azoro casi unánime en el país. Tales reacciones tienen que ver, desde luego, con las sistemáticas agresiones en contra de México y de los mexicanos con las que el magnate ha buscado seducir el voto de sectores reaccionarios, racistas y xenofóbicos que, por desgracia, son numerosos en su nación. Tales ataques se han convertido casi en el emblema del espíritu rústico, belicoso y demagógico del republicano y lo han convertido en un personaje impresentable en México, en primer lugar, pero también entre muchos ciudadanos de la nación vecina y a los ojos del mundo.

Pero, más allá de las inadmisibles posturas de Trump, la invitación a los dos aspirantes presidenciales de Estados Unidos –atendida de inmediato por el republicano, y que la demócrata Hillary Clinton aún no ha aceptado ni rechazado– resulta un gesto inusitado cuyas motivaciones no es fácil comprender porque pone a México y a su Presidencia en el terreno de los forcejeos electorales estadunidenses y lo coloca como objeto de disputa en la contienda presidencial que se desarrolla al norte del río Bravo.

Ciertamente, en la presentación conjunta Peña Nieto expresó, en la cara de su incómodo huésped, una postura firme en defensa de los mexicanos que viven en Estados Unidos y reivindicó la importancia de una relación bilateral basada en el diálogo y no en la confrontación. Pero las implicaciones negativas del encuentro exceden con mucho a los beneficios.

De hecho, las consecuencias de esta riesgosa apuesta podían verse incluso desde antes de que se concretara el encuentro entre Peña Nieto y Trump: el segundo podría capitalizar su viaje –como en efecto lo hizo– para atenuar los efectos más ríspidos de su prédica antimexicana sin perder, por ello, a los adeptos que tal postura le ha sumado. Porque, a fin de cuentas, el magnate no hizo en tierras mexicanas concesión alguna, no varió un ápice su idea delirante de construir un muro a lo largo de toda la línea fronteriza y no hubo en sus palabras ni una insinuación de disculpa por todos los insultos vertidos a lo largo de un año en contra de México y de sus gobernantes.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Germany: Donald Trump’s Military Intervention in LA Is a Planned Escalation

Canada: President Trump, the G7 and Canada’s New ‘Realistic’ Foreign Policy

Mexico: Big Tech and the Police State

Russia: Trump Is Shielding America*

Canada: Trump vs. Musk, the Emperor and the Oligarch

Topics

Venezuela: The Devil in Los Angeles

Germany: Donald Trump’s Military Intervention in LA Is a Planned Escalation

Mexico: Migration: A Political Crisis?

Poland: Los Angeles Riots: Battle for America’s Future

Germany: Donald Trump Is Damaging the US

Canada: President Trump, the G7 and Canada’s New ‘Realistic’ Foreign Policy

Taiwan: The Beginning of a Post-Hegemonic Era: A New Normal for International Relations

Canada: Trump vs. Musk, the Emperor and the Oligarch

Related Articles

Germany: Donald Trump’s Military Intervention in LA Is a Planned Escalation

Switzerland: US Travel Bans: On Immigration Policy, Trump Is Anything but Erratic

Germany: Donald Trump Is Damaging the US

Canada: President Trump, the G7 and Canada’s New ‘Realistic’ Foreign Policy

Israel: The President Who Forgot History: Trump Blames Biden for Wave of Antisemitism