Which System Was Superior in the Cold War?

Published in Mainichi Shimbun
(Japan) on 25 April 2020
by (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Eric Stimson. Edited by Patricia Simoni.

 

 

It was May 1962, in the midst of the Cold War propaganda contest over which system was superior. U.S. President John F. Kennedy told a gathering of businessmen that “the difference between America and the Soviet Union is the supermarket. The difference between what you can put in a shopping basket in an hour is the difference between the U.S. and USSR.”* The story that Daiei’s founder, Isao Nakauchi, was so moved by these words that he spread his supermarkets around Japan is well-known. Kennedy had delivered a historic speech two months earlier. It was a special speech, which for the first time described consumer rights — the right to safety, the right to be informed and so on. He considered protecting consumer rights indispensable for a society where supermarkets provide a huge quantity of products.

It is the first test of that kind of “supermarket society.” Faced with crowded supermarkets, Tokyo has requested using them once every three days as a measure against the new coronavirus. But supermarkets, coping with workers worried about infections and impoverished by customers’ claims, warn of the danger of a “supermarket collapse.” In a time when “Stay Home” has become a catchphrase, supermarkets have become supply bases that support regional lifestyles. Cooperating with measures that safeguard them from infection and poverty should top the list of consumer rights; it’s the same thing as ensuring the right to safety. Twenty years after Kennedy’s speech, Consumers International also recognized the obligations of consumers. One of these is social concern, which means being aware of the effects of consumer actions on others, particularly the disadvantaged. This is the moral basis of the supermarket society.

*This quote, though accurately translated, cannot be verified.


米ソ冷戦で、どちらの体制が優れているかの宣伝合戦たけなわの1962年5月のことだ。ケネディ米大統領は「米ソの違いはスーパーマーケットがあるかないかだ」と業者の大会にメッセージを寄せた▲「1時間で買えるバスケットの中身の違いこそが米ソの違いである」。この言葉に感動したダイエー創業者の中内功(なかうち・いさお)が、日本にスーパーを一気に普及させた逸話(いつわ)はよく知られる。そのケネディは2カ月前に歴史的教書を公表していた▲安全である権利、知らされる権利など、消費者の権利を初めてうたった特別教書である。スーパーが商品を大量供給する社会では、消費者の権利擁護が不可欠とみたのだ。そんな「スーパーのある社会」にとっても、初の試練である▲混雑するスーパーの現状に、東京都は新型コロナウイルス対策として「3日に1度」の利用を求めた。一方、スーパー側からは、従業員の感染不安、客のクレーム対応での疲弊(ひへい)などから、「スーパー崩壊」の危機を訴える声まで出た▲「ステイホーム(家にいよう)」が合言葉となった今日、地域の暮らしを支える補給基地となったスーパーである。そこを感染や疲弊から守る取り組みへの協力は、消費者の権利の筆頭――「安全である」のを守ることにほかならない▲ケネディ教書の20年後、国際消費者機構は消費者の責務をも定めた。その一つが「社会的関心」、つまり消費行動の他者、とくに弱者への影響を自覚する責務だった。「スーパーのある社会」のモラルの基本だ。
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Germany: Donald Trump’s Military Intervention in LA Is a Planned Escalation

Poland: Los Angeles Riots: Battle for America’s Future

Mexico: Migration: A Political Crisis?

Venezuela: The Devil in Los Angeles

Canada: Trump vs. Musk, the Emperor and the Oligarch

Topics

Venezuela: The Devil in Los Angeles

Germany: Donald Trump’s Military Intervention in LA Is a Planned Escalation

Mexico: Migration: A Political Crisis?

Poland: Los Angeles Riots: Battle for America’s Future

Germany: Donald Trump Is Damaging the US

Canada: President Trump, the G7 and Canada’s New ‘Realistic’ Foreign Policy

Taiwan: The Beginning of a Post-Hegemonic Era: A New Normal for International Relations

Canada: Trump vs. Musk, the Emperor and the Oligarch

Related Articles

Japan: Trump’s 100 Days: A Future with No Visible Change So Far

Japan: US Administration Losing Credibility 3 Months into Policy of Threats

Japan: US-Japan Defense Minister Summit: US-Japan Defense Chief Talks Strengthen Concerns about Single-Minded Focus on Strength

Japan: Trump’s Tariffs Threaten To Repeat Historical Mistakes

Hong Kong: China, Japan, South Korea Pave Way for Summit Talks; Liu Teng-Chung: Responding to Trump