Risk of Democratic Regression in the US

Published in El País
(Spain) on 23 June 2021
by (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Marta Quirós Alarcón. Edited by Helaine Schweitzer.
Republican maneuvers to obstruct minority voting rights are disgraceful.

American democracy is in a fight for its very essence: the right to universal suffrage. The fact that this battle is happening before elections makes it no less significant for the impact it is having in the medium term on the confidence the country and the rest of the world have with respect to the reliability of American institutions. During the first half of this year, 18 Republican-led state legislatures passed laws aimed at suppressing the vote. Legislating in order to reduce the number of polling places, reducing the number of hours to vote, and toughening voter registration requirements can only be described as a first-rate democratic involution. To put it simply, politicians are trying to prevent people from voting.

The 2020 presidential election and, above all, the Georgia Senate race, set off alarms among Republicans. Democrats managed to flip the southern state with dependable and systematic voter mobilization in poor and Black neighborhoods in the big cities. The same dynamic is taking place in Arizona with the Mexican American vote. In just four years of Trumpism, two solidly Republican states have voted for a Democratic president and the four senators from those states are Democrats. The conclusion the Republican establishment has reached is not that it should adjust its policy, but that this increase in urban and minority vote poses an existential threat that it must stop at any cost.

Given this situation, the Biden administration took a first, very significant step by introducing a federal bill that would have provided the states with an ambitious defense of voting rights and would have made it increasingly easy for citizens to vote. The bill died on Tuesday, as soon as it breathed the toxic air on the U.S. Senate floor. Republicans blocked passage through a filibuster, which requires a 60-40 vote to end and begin debate. The Democrats’ defeat on Tuesday forces them to confront a legislative weakness, the fact that 50 seats in the Senate are not enough to pass their ambitious agenda. Thus, procedural rules are the next great battle for which Democrats are preparing to present to the public.

“This fight is far from over,” President Joe Biden promised after the Senate vote. “Our very democracy" is at stake, he added. He does not appear to be exaggerating. The fight to expand voting rights is as old as American democracy itself; it is within the framework of the fight for civil rights, and progress on behalf of voting rights is considered to be among the great moments in the history of the republic. This is one of those moments. This time, however, the challenge is not in the system's shortcomings, but in the threat of democratic regression on the part of a Republican Party that feels disadvantaged by that progress.


Riesgo de involución democrática en EE UU

Las maniobras de los republicanos para dificultar el ejercicio del voto a las minorías es lamentable

La democracia de Estados Unidos vive una batalla sobre su esencia misma, el derecho de sufragio universal, que no por anticipada deja de ser trascendental para el futuro a medio plazo de la confianza de ese país, y el resto del mundo, en la fiabilidad de sus instituciones. En la primera mitad de este año, 18 Estados con mayorías republicanas en sus legislativos han aprobado leyes destinadas a dificultar el ejercicio del voto. Legislar para reducir el número de lugares de votación, o las horas para hacerlo, o endurecer los requisitos para registrarse no se pueden calificar más que de involución democrática de primer orden: políticos intentando que la gente no vote, simplemente.

Las pasadas elecciones presidenciales de 2020, y sobre todo las del Senado en Georgia, hicieron saltar todas las alarmas entre los republicanos. Con una movilización fiable y sistematizada del voto en barrios pobres y negros de las grandes ciudades, los demócratas han dado la vuelta al Estado sureño. La misma dinámica se da en Arizona con el voto mexicoamericano. En apenas cuatro años de trumpismo, dos Estados sólidamente republicanos han votado a un presidente demócrata y tienen sus cuatro senadores demócratas. La conclusión que ha sacado el establishment republicano no es que debe cambiar sus políticas, sino que el avance del voto urbano y de las minorías supone una amenaza existencial que necesitan frenar a toda costa.

Ante esta situación, la Administración de Biden ha dado un primer paso de calado al presentar una ley federal que impone a los Estados una ambiciosa defensa y ampliación de las facilidades para votar. La ley murió este martes, nada más respirar el aire tóxico del hemiciclo del Senado de EE UU. Los republicanos bloquearon la tramitación con la táctica procedimental del filibusterismo, que impone de facto la necesidad de 60 votos para aprobar leyes. La derrota del martes coloca a los demócratas frente a su debilidad parlamentaria, la evidencia de que 50 escaños no son suficientes para aprobar su ambiciosa agenda. Así, las normas procedimentales del Senado son la siguiente gran batalla para la cual los demócratas están preparando a la opinión pública.

“Esta lucha está lejos de haber terminado”, prometió el presidente Biden tras la votación en el Senado. Está en juego “la democracia misma”, añadió. No parece exagerado. La batalla por ampliar los derechos de voto es tan antigua como la democracia americana, está enmarcada en la lucha por los derechos civiles, y los avances en este ámbito son reconocidos hoy como grandes momentos de la historia de la República. Este es uno de ellos. Pero esta vez el reto no radica en las deficiencias del sistema, sino en la amenaza de involución por parte de un Partido Republicano que se siente perjudicado por esos avances.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Australia: Another White House Ambush Sends a Message to World Leaders Entering Donald Trump’s Den

Germany: Trump’s Momentary Corrective Shift

Germany: Trump-Putin Call: Nothing but Empty Talk

Austria: The Harvard President’s Voluntary Pay Cut Is a Strong Signal

Topics

Germany: Trump-Putin Call: Nothing but Empty Talk

Austria: The Harvard President’s Voluntary Pay Cut Is a Strong Signal

Canada: No, Joly, We Don’t Want America’s Far-Left Academic Refugees

Germany: Trump’s Selfishness

Austria: Trump Ignores Israel’s Interests during Gulf Visit

Germany: Trump’s Offer and Trump’s Sword

Canada: A Guide To Surviving the Trump Era

Related Articles

Spain: Spain’s Defense against Trump’s Tariffs

U.K.: The Guardian View on Donald Trump’s Industrial Policy: Inward Turn by Ultimatum

Israel: Trump’s Friendship with Israel Is a Double-Edged Sword

South Africa: The Oligarch Era: Is Democracy Finally Fighting Back in the Land of the Free?