The United States Faces the Future of Outer Space

Published in Diario de Cuyo
(Argentina) on 26 July 2011
by (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Miken Trogdon. Edited by Nathan Ladd.
With the end of the space shuttles, NASA lacks adequate ships to send astronauts and cargo.

With the grounding of the Atlantis last Thursday, the United States closed a chapter in the evolution of manned space travel without a new vehicle to replace the successful series of space shuttles that served as the link between Earth and space for three decades.

The economic crisis got to NASA, which will enter into a passive stage with great social impact on Florida. More than 7,000 very qualified jobs will be lost at the Kennedy Space Center and other places, as well as in other agencies that develop advanced technology. In addition, tourist investments from the attraction that this launch center generated to hundreds of thousands of annual visitors will suffer.

The austere continuation of the United States in space has other aims/goals, like the Constellation Project, announced by President Barack Obama and destined to again put astronauts on the moon and construct a capsule and rocket that carry astronauts to an asteroid and finally to Mars. Clearly these plans will not be initiated immediately; and if the Space Agency could put them into motion right now, they would employ 8,500 people, in contrast to the 17,000 that gave life to the space center during the space shuttle era. What is certain is that NASA was left without ships for specific tasks and now depends on Russia to equip them with supplies and replacement astronauts for the International Space Station.

Politics also comes in at this juncture. Moscow will look to regain hegemony in space that was lost to the hands of the North Americans after the Soviet collapse, and is now filling the space left by the shuttles with the legendary Soyuz ships that, although ancient, are reliable after having had their analog electronics replaced with digital. But the Soyuz is still totally incompatible with the grounded American shuttles: the Soyuz only carries three astronauts, while the space shuttles could carry up to seven men and 30 tons of cargo.

Even though Russia assures that it is not behind in space technology, it is evident that its budget only manages to update the existing equipment, because it hasn’t surprised anyone with new devices meant for conquering space either. In order to achieve mutual objectives and for the good of the progress of humanity, the cooperation that nations advanced in this field have is necessary.


EEUU frente al futuro espacial
Con el fin de los transbordadores la NASA carece de naves apropiadas para enviar astronautas y cargas.

Con el aterrizaje del Atlantis, el jueves último, Estados Unidos cerró un ciclo en la evolución de los viajes espaciales tripulados y sin un nuevo vehículo que suplante a la exitosa serie de los transbordadores que sirvieron de nexo entre la Tierra y el espacio durante tres décadas.

La crisis económica llegó a la NASA, que entrará en una etapa pasiva con un gran impacto social en La Florida. En el Centro Espacial Kennedy y otras dependencias que desarrollan tecnologías de avanzada se perderán más de 7.000 puestos de trabajo muy calificado. Además, resentirá los ingresos turísticos por la atracción que generaba este centro de lanzamiento con centenares de miles de visitantes anuales.

La austera continuidad espacial estadounidense tiene otras metas, como el proyecto Constellation, anunciado por el presidente Barack Obama, y destinado a poner nuevamente astronautas en la Luna y la construcción de una cápsula y un cohete que lleve astronautas a un asteroide y finalmente a Marte. Claro que estos planes no tienen iniciación inmediata y si la Agencia espacial los pudiera poner en marcha ahora, ocuparía a 8.500 personas, contra las 17.000 que dieron vida al centro espacial durante la era de los transbordadores. Lo cierto es que la NASA se quedó sin naves para tareas específicas y depende ahora de Rusia para dotar de suministros y relevos a la Estación Espacial Internacional.

En esta coyuntura también entra la política. Moscú, buscará recuperar la hegemonía espacial perdida en manos norteamericanas, tras el colapso soviético, cubriendo ahora el vacío dejado por los "shuttle'' con las legendarias naves Soyuz que, aunque vetustas, son confiables al haberles reemplazado la electrónica analógica por digital. Pero la Soyuz es totalmente incompatible con las naves norteamericanas dadas de baja: la ruta sólo lleva tres astronautas mientras los transbordadores podían llevar hasta siete tripulantes y hasta 30 toneladas de carga.

Si bien Rusia asegura no estar atrasada en tecnología espacial, es evidente que sus presupuestos sólo alcanzan para actualizar el equipamiento existente, porque tampoco ha vuelto a sorprender con nuevos artefactos destinados a la conquista del espacio. Queda, para bien del progreso de la humanidad, la buena complementación que tienen las naciones avanzadas en esta materia para lograr objetivos comunes.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Taiwan: Making America Great Again and Taiwan’s Crucial Choice

Austria: Donald Trump Revives the Liberals in Canada

Germany: Absolute Arbitrariness

Switzerland: Donald Trump: 100 Days Already, but How Many Years?

     

Austria: Musk, the Man of Scorched Earth

Topics

Mexico: EU: Concern for the Press

Austria: Musk, the Man of Scorched Earth

Germany: Cynicism, Incompetence and Megalomania

Switzerland: Donald Trump: 100 Days Already, but How Many Years?

     

Austria: Donald Trump Revives the Liberals in Canada

Germany: Absolute Arbitrariness

Israel: Trump’s National Security Adviser Forgot To Leave Personal Agenda at Home and Fell

Mexico: The Trump Problem

Related Articles

Argentina: Trump Is Laying His Cards Down

Argentina: The US-China Microprocessor War

Argentina: Help for Trump in 2024

Argentina: Understanding a 2nd Cold War