Some Advice on Peacefully Solving South China Sea Issues

Published in Huanqiu
(China) on 2 November 2011
by Li Daguang (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Yipeng Xie. Edited by Mark DeLucas.
Along with the increasingly intense debate over South China Sea issues, some non-South China Sea countries are uniting to besiege China. These countries, which debate vehemently over South China Sea issues, intend to gain benefits from access to the South China Sea.

The U.S. pays attention to the South China Sea because of its global strategic needs and for the purpose of enhancing its control and influence over the Asia-Pacific area. Japan’s resources are extremely scant. However, the South China Sea is the most obvious way of connecting Japan to the rest of the world; therefore, the Japanese government is currently promoting its “Entering the South Sea Strategy.” India’s involvement in South China Sea issues is completely a speculative strategy. The South China Sea is not the Indian Ocean; it is not essential to India’s national defense. India’s explicit involvement in the issues merely follows the diplomatic strategies of England, which aligned itself with Japan in 1902 to circumscribe Russia. India’s purpose is to limit China from the east. Curiously, India, which has support from the Persian Gulf, will ask for special access to the South China Sea’s oil and gas.

To deal with the issues well also tests China’s intelligence in politics and diplomacy. The solution to South China Sea issues does not follow any guidelines or tactics, but requires a fundamental principle, which is to put peace first. Therefore, assuaging [tensions] is the first step. Regarding the intention of the countries surrounding the South China Sea to occupy the sea in recent years, China should employ rational, advantageous and polite principles and enhance action on these issues by employing economic, diplomatic, military and other strategies.

In terms of the economy, China should enable ASEAN (Association of Southeast Asian Nations) to better depend economically on China through economic exchange and cooperation. In recent years, China and ASEAN have rapidly developed a economic and trading relationship. ASEAN is currently China’s third biggest trading partner, while China has become ASEAN’s biggest trading partner and first exporting destination. Simultaneously, the stable political development also propels the development of a mutual economic and trading relationship. Since 2004, China has been Vietnam’s biggest trading partner. The economic relationship will become the first victim of military hostility, which is a result that both China and Vietnam want to avoid.

In terms of diplomacy, China should tackle the relationships with pertinent countries well, especially the U.S. If China wants to solve the South China Sea issues, it must first eliminate or try to decrease the interference and interruption from the U.S. on the South China Sea. Meanwhile, China should also enhance its friendly relationships with surrounding countries.

In terms of military, China should enhance its naval strength as soon as possible to weaken the U.S.’ advantage in this field. Hence, China should accelerate the construction of aircraft carriers, new nuclear submarines and huge warships to enhance its capability in an ocean war. Along with the increasing amount of threats on China’s foreign profits, China should try to create a “Blue Water Navy” equipped with the ability to wage oceanic war. At the same time, China should dedicate itself to improving oceanic mobility and strategic projection capability and produce large warships, new submarines with reasonable underwater self-control and invisibility, supersonic navigation war planes, long-distance missiles with accurate penetration ability and other next-generation weapons.

In terms of strategy, China should enhance contact and communication with the Taiwanese army. Recently, the civil societies in both China and Taiwan have been advocating safe cooperation in the South China Sea area and are urging the protection of China’s sovereignty on the South China Sea. After the achievement of “San Tong” between mainland China and Taiwan, mainland China has frequently expressed the hope to construct a military trust system between China and Taiwan.

A peaceful solution to South China Sea issues will be attained. An unstable South China Sea doesn’t benefit anyone. China should incorporate and propel the four aspects mentioned above to enable them to help solve South China Sea issues.

The author is a professor at the National Defense University PLA China.


 随着南海争端热度持续上升,一些非南海周边国也掺和进来,形成对中国的围攻之势。这些国家热炒南海问题,目的不外乎是想在南海谋求各自的利益。


  美国染指南海,主要是出于全球战略需要,强化对亚太地区的影响和掌控。日本资源极端匮乏,而南海是日本走向世界的必经之地,因此日本政府最近积极推行“南进战略”。印度介入南海事务则完全是一种投机行为。南海不是印度洋,不是印度国家安全的命根子,印度高调介入南海,充其量只是1902年英国拉拢日本牵制俄国的外交策略的模仿,目的是从东部牵制中国。很难理解,在家门口守着波斯湾的印度对南海的油气资源会有特殊需求。

妥善处理好南海问题也考验中国的政治和外交智慧。解决南海问题没什么预定程式或路线图,但有基本原则,即以和平大局为重。因此,缓和是第一步。针对近年来南海周边国家对南海的争夺,中国应该采取有理、有利、有节的原则,加强运用经济、外交、军事和策略等方面提高在南海问题上的主动权。


  在经济上,应该通过发展对东盟的经济交流与合作,加大东盟各国对中国经济的依赖。近年来,中国与东盟国家经贸关系发展迅速,东盟现在已是中国第三大贸易伙伴,而中国已成东盟第一大贸易伙伴和第一大出口目的地。同时政治上良好稳定的发展,也进一步促进双边经贸关系的发展。2004年以来中国一直是越南最大贸易伙伴。经济关系会成为军事敌对首当其冲的牺牲品,这是中越都极力避免的结局。


  在外交上,运筹好与相关国家的关系,特别是美国。中国欲解决南海问题,必须首先排除或者尽量减少美国在此区域的干预和对我国在南海行动的阻挠。同时,还要加强与周边国家的友好关系。


  在军事上,应尽快加强海军力量建设,弱化美国在此区域的军事优势,因此应加快建设航母、新型核潜艇和大型海上作战舰艇,加强远洋作战能力。随着海外利益受到越来越多的威胁,中国应该是努力打造一支具备远洋作战能力的“蓝水海军”,努力提高远海机动能力和战略投送能力,研制大型水面战斗舰艇、水下自持力和隐身性能好的新型潜艇、超音速巡航作战飞机、精确化突防能力强的远射程导弹等新一代武器装备。


  在策略上,加强同台湾军队的联系与沟通,共同协调防卫南海。近来,两岸民间都有声音呼吁两岸加强在南海地区的安全合作,共同维护南海主权。两岸开放“三通”后,大陆多次发出善意,期待两岸建立军事互信机制。


  和平解决南海争端是大势所趋,一个动荡不安的南海对谁也没有好处。以上4个方面,应当相互配合、相互促进,共同在南海问题上发挥最大的作用。(作者是国防大学教授)
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Germany: Cynicism, Incompetence and Megalomania

Austria: Musk, the Man of Scorched Earth

Mexico: The Trump Problem

Austria: Donald Trump Revives the Liberals in Canada

Switzerland: Donald Trump: 100 Days Already, but How Many Years?

     

Topics

Mexico: EU: Concern for the Press

Austria: Musk, the Man of Scorched Earth

Germany: Cynicism, Incompetence and Megalomania

Switzerland: Donald Trump: 100 Days Already, but How Many Years?

     

Austria: Donald Trump Revives the Liberals in Canada

Germany: Absolute Arbitrariness

Israel: Trump’s National Security Adviser Forgot To Leave Personal Agenda at Home and Fell

Mexico: The Trump Problem

Related Articles

Mexico: The Trump Problem

Taiwan: Making America Great Again and Taiwan’s Crucial Choice

Venezuela: Vietnam: An Outlet for China

Germany: US Companies in Tariff Crisis: Planning Impossible, Price Increases Necessary

Hong Kong: Can US Tariffs Targeting Hong Kong’s ‘Very Survival’ Really Choke the Life out of It?