The Community of Latin American and Caribbean States

Published in El Nacional
(Dominican Republic ) on 7 December 2011
by Lilliam Oviedo (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Robin Salomon . Edited by Mark DeLucas.
The Community of Latin American and Caribbean States is the result of more significant efforts at regional integration. This body’s constitution has not been well received by the United States and ultra-right Latin America, because it is the direct consequence of the understanding in the hemisphere that governments, like those of Brazil and Venezuela, believe that development occurs through the exercise of full sovereignty.

The integration of all of the area's governments and the commitment of all its states is an achievement. Nevertheless, the Community of Latin American and Caribbean States will be successful only to the extent that it succeeds in stripping the Organization of American States of the centrality on which the great powers insist. In order to complete this process, the influence of the region's progressive governments should be increased. The United States will collaborate with allied powers and will use the services of the far right to prevent the Organization of American States from being superseded. This should not surprise us.

Mexican president Felipe Calderon and the ultra-right Colombian President Juan Manuel Santos no longer want the two organizations to remain as distinct entities. This is also the position of Sebastian Pinera of Chile and Panama’s Ricardo Martinelli. Ecuadorian President Rafael Correa believes, however, that the Organization of American States is worn and says that Latin America’s problems should not be discussed in Washington.

Canada and the United States are not part of the Community of Latin American and Caribbean States and it's not just a matter of geography. Canadian and U.S. interests have collaborated more than once in retarding the political advancement of our people. One must not wipe from memory centuries of interference, invasions and imperialistic exercises in its various manifestations.

U.S. State Department [Deputy] Spokesperson Mark Toner said, “There are many sub-regional organizations in the hemisphere. We belong to some and not others. … We continue to work through OAS, which is the preeminent multilateral organization that speaks for the hemisphere.”

Organization of American States provided a platform for isolating Cuba in the 1960s. At every opportunity, it has redesigned its guidelines to legitimize interference and intervention.

In the 1990s, the United States showed no hostility to the efforts of numerous Latin American presidents (Jose Maria Figueres Olsen, Alvaro Arzu Irigoyen, and Leonel Fernandez, among others), who stressed the need to “sell” the region and privatize everything.

If today the United States and right wing Latin America challenge the rise of the Community of Latin American and Caribbean States, it is because they perceive it as a hole in their boot. They want to maintain colonies and control them. Perhaps it’s worth mentioning here the words of Mario Benedetti: “The motto is to live in spite of them.”


La Comunidad de Estados Latinoamericanos y Caribeños, CELAC, es el resultado de los más significativos esfuerzos de integración regional. La constitución de este organismo no ha sido bien vista por Estados Unidos y por la ultraderecha latinoamericana, porque es consecuencia directa de la incidencia que tienen en el hemisferio gobiernos que, como el de Brasil y el de Venezuela, entienden que el desarrollo pasa por el ejercicio de la soberanía plena.

La integración de todos los gobiernos del área y el compromiso de todos los Estados, es un logro. Pero la CELAC será exitosa en la medida en que logre despojar a la Organización de Estados Americanos, OEA, de la principalía que las grandes potencias insisten en seguirle reconociendo. Para que este proceso concluya, deberá aumentar la influencia en la región de los gobiernos progresistas. Estados Unidos se asociará con las potencias aliadas y usará los servicios de la ultraderecha para tratar de evitar que la OEA sea suplantada. Eso no puede sorprendernos.

El presidente de México, Felipe Calderón, y el de Colombia, el ultraderechista Juan Manuel Santos, han dejado ver que quieren que la CELAC y la OEA permanezcan como entes distintos. Es la posición de Sebastián Piñera, de Chile, y del panameño Ricardo Martinelli. El presidente de Ecuador, Rafael Correa, considera, sin embargo, que la OEA está desgastada, y dice que los problemas de América Latina no deben ser discutidos en Washington.

Canadá y Estados Unidos no forman parte de la CELAC. Y no se puede hablar solo de geografía. Los intereses de Canadá y Estados Unidos se han constituido más de una vez en retranca para el avance político de nuestros pueblos. No se borran de un plumazo siglos de injerencia, invasiones y ejercicio imperialista en sus más diversas manifestaciones.

Mark Toner, vocero del Departamento de Estado, dijo: "Hay muchas organizaciones subregionales en el hemisferio, nosotros pertenecemos a algunas y a otras no, nosotros seguimos trabajando a través de la OEA, que es la organización multilateral preeminente que habla por el hemisferio".

La OEA sirvió de plataforma para aislar a Cuba en la década de 1960. En cada momento, ha rediseñado sus lineamientos para continuar legitimando la injerencia y la intervención.

En la década de 1990, Estados Unidos no mostró rechazo a las gestiones de presidentes latinoamericanos (José María Figueres Olsen, Álvaro Arzú Irigoyen y Leonel Fernández, entre otros), quienes destacaban la necesidad de “vender” la región y de privatizarlo todo.

Si hoy Estados Unidos y la ultraderecha latinoamericana cuestionan el surgimiento de la CELAC, es porque la perciben como un agujero en su bota. Quieren mantener colonias y tener un ministerio de colonias… Vale citar de nuevo a Mario Benedetti: La consigna es joderles el proyecto.

This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Germany: Absolute Arbitrariness

Taiwan: Making America Great Again and Taiwan’s Crucial Choice

Israel: Trump’s National Security Adviser Forgot To Leave Personal Agenda at Home and Fell

Mexico: EU: Concern for the Press

Switzerland: Donald Trump: 100 Days Already, but How Many Years?

     

Topics

Mexico: EU: Concern for the Press

Austria: Musk, the Man of Scorched Earth

Germany: Cynicism, Incompetence and Megalomania

Switzerland: Donald Trump: 100 Days Already, but How Many Years?

     

Austria: Donald Trump Revives the Liberals in Canada

Germany: Absolute Arbitrariness

Israel: Trump’s National Security Adviser Forgot To Leave Personal Agenda at Home and Fell

Mexico: The Trump Problem

Related Articles

Dominican Republic : Requiem for USAID

Dominican Republic: Trump versus Harris

Dominican Republic : With Trump, We’re Screwed

Dominican Republic: Kamala Effervescent

Dominican Republic: The Canonization of ‘Saint’ Henry Kissinger