Government Shutdown: Why Americans Don't Care

Published in Sina
(China) on 7 October 2013
by Qiao Lei (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Caroline Moreno. Edited by Kyrstie Lane  .
On Oct. 6, the American federal government shutdown entered its sixth day. Congressional Republicans and Obama each have their own ideas and will not compromise. No one can say accurately when the government will resume business. Several hundreds of thousands of federal employees have returned home on furlough, and this time, Congress has taken pity on them: Those who are not working may receive their wages or later receive back pay. The federal government shutdown has not had too large of an influence on civilians: Life continues as usual, but the government employees home on furlough are reaping benefits from the misfortune, receiving paid vacation for no reason. In this kind of situation, the federal government resuming operations has changed things among politicians. The people see and understand in their hearts that the government is taking care of too many idle people; small government, large society is still better.

At the time of the U.S. government shutdown, highway traffic was as heavy as usual, and you could not tell the difference. America was not paralyzed; the stock market climbed as it did before. On the contrary, the shutdown magnifies the superiority of the U.S. federal system and small government. The federal government controls only the military, foreign affairs, security, borders and other such central authorities. Of course, it still has the power to monitor, but the majority of other powers return to state and local governments, such as maintaining public security, traffic control and so on. Even U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services is not influenced because its funding relies on the filing of fees immigrants pay to the government. The U.S. Postal Service operates autonomously, so the government shutdown also does not affect the post office's mail delivery. If the state and city governments were to shut down, there would be even more disturbances in people's livelihoods. So, to people in other countries, the U.S. government shutdown seems to be a tremendous event, but the majority of Americans seem to not care about it.

The U.S. government shutdown is a most typical political battle: Republicans have always seen Obama's health care reform as a thorn in their side, and they will not be happy until it is gone. They have seized this opportune moment of government funding allocations to launch their attack, not hesitating to allow the government to shut down to force Obama to make concessions on the health care reform law. Yet Obama is also resolved and would rather the government shut down than not implement the health care reform. In this kind of situation, the government has become a sacrificial lamb; Congress will not allocate funds: Uncle Sam is poor and cannot make it work without money. In recent years, in the fierce battles between Republicans and Democrats, the main tool has been exerting pressure on the White House during government funding allocations, and in the end, they played big and greatly paralyzed the government.

In reality, Americans are already very disgusted with and revolted by the fierce battles between the political parties, but they have no alternative. These members were elected; a House representative's term is a couple of years, a senator's is six years and presidential elections are once every four years. They want to change people but still need to endure through this time. So, since the people have elected their politicians through elections, this is the price the electorate must pay for their irresponsible behavior.

During this time, when people care about what kind of influence the government shutdown will have on the lives of the masses, the media is actually considering the question of whether the American political operating model needs to be changed. Reuters news agency stated that this U.S. congressional deadlock is making people raise new challenges regarding whether the deeply divided Congress is able to carry out the most basic functions. An imbalance in the political functions of the U.S. Congress has also triggered new worries, even if Congress is able to reach a unanimous decision on borrowing the $16.7 trillion limit before the final mid-October deadline. The Wall Street Journal believes that concrete evidence proves that in a situation of severe divergences internally in the government, it is harder and harder for Congress to carry out its basic responsibilities of a planned budget and priority order of expenditures. In the days ahead, U.S. government circles expect performances of mounting intense publicity by excellent politicians, with both sides attempting to occupy the political vantage point.

The reason for the polarization in American politics is because the two parties and two kinds of ideologies have misunderstood Americans as a whole. Americans do not like "indulgence" and "selfishness"; they do not like the government excessively interfering in personal decisions, and they also do not like heavy taxes. The American people hope the government will look after each citizen and believe that success depends on his or her own striving. Americans recognize that the difference between the rich and the poor is excessively grave, and they agree that America's strength mainly comes from its commercial success. The majority of Americans believe that government efficiency is often low, and waste is a common practice. The government shutdown is also making people experience more deeply the keenly felt pain of the fierce battles between the political parties, meaning their hope for small government and large society has become the largest byproduct of the government shutdown.


政府关门,美国人为何不在乎

6日,美国联邦政府关门进入第六天。国会共和党人和奥巴马双双各执己见,互不让步,啥时政府复工没人能说的准。联邦几十万雇员回家休假,国会这时候发善心,不干活可以照领工资或是以后补发工资。联邦政府关门对老百姓生活没啥太大影响,马照跑、舞照跳,而回家休假的政府雇员因祸得福,平白拣了个有薪假期。在这种情况下,联邦政府恢复运作变成了政客之间的事,老百姓看在眼里,明白在心上,这政府养的闲人太多,还是小政府、大社会比较好。

  在美国政府关门之际,驾车行驶在高速公路上,一样的车水马龙,看不出一点异样。美国没有瘫痪,股市照样攀升。关门反而凸显了美国联邦制和小政府的优势:联邦仅掌握军队、外交、安全、边境等核心权力,当然还有监听的权力,而其他大部分权力归州和地方,如治安维持、交通管理等。即使是联邦机构移民局,也因为其经费来源靠移民们“供奉”的规费也不受影响。美国邮局属于自主经营,政府关门也不影响邮局送信送报。假如州和市政府关闭,民生的困扰会更多。所以美国政府关门在别的国家民众眼里好像是个天大的事,但多数美国人似乎对此不在乎。

  美国政府停摆是最典型的政治恶斗,共和党一直将奥巴马的医保改革视为眼中钉,欲废之而后快。这次抓住政府拨款的时机发难,不惜让政府关门,以迫使奥巴马在医改法上让步。但奥巴马也铁了心,宁可政府关门也要实施医改法。在这种情况下,政府成了牺牲品,国会不拨款,“山姆大叔”就没钱,没了钱什么也玩不转。多年来,共和党和民主党恶斗,主要工具就是利用对政府拨款时施压白宫,最后玩大了,就把政府玩瘫巴了。

  实际上美国人对政党之间的恶斗已经十分厌恶、反感但又无可奈何。这议员是选出来了,众议员的一届任期是两年,参议员是六年,总统选举也是四年一次,就是想换人,还得熬时间吧。所以选举政治民众必须付出的代价是,既然人们通过选举选择了政客,民众就需为政客的不负责任行为买单。

  在人们关注政府停摆会对民众生活产生何种影响的时候,媒体则在思考美国政治的运作模式是否需要改变的问题。路透社的报道称,美国这次僵局令人对深陷分歧的国会能否运行最基本的职能提出新的质疑。美国国会的政治机能失调也引发了新的忧虑,即国会能否在10月中期的最后期限前就上调16.7万亿美元的举债限额达成一致。《华尔街日报》认为,事实证明,在政府内部存在严重分歧的情况下,国会越来越难以履行其安排预算和支出优先顺序的基本职责。在接下来的日子里,美国政界料将上演紧锣密鼓的政治秀,双方都将试图占据政治制高点。

  美国政治之所以两极化,是因为两党、两种意识形态都误解了作为一个整体的美国人。美国人既不喜欢“放纵”也不喜欢“自私”,既不喜欢政府过分干预个人决定也不喜欢沉重的税收。美国民众既希望政府照顾每个公民,又相信成功要靠自己打拼。美国人既认同贫富分化太过严重,又同意美国的强大主要源于商业的成功。多数美国人认为政府常常效率低下、浪费成风,而政府关门也让民众对政党恶斗切肤之痛体会更深、对小政府、大社会的期待或将成为美国政府关门带来的最大副产品。
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Taiwan: Making America Great Again and Taiwan’s Crucial Choice

Switzerland: Donald Trump: 100 Days Already, but How Many Years?

     

Germany: Absolute Arbitrariness

Austria: Musk, the Man of Scorched Earth

Mexico: The Trump Problem

Topics

Mexico: EU: Concern for the Press

Austria: Musk, the Man of Scorched Earth

Germany: Cynicism, Incompetence and Megalomania

Switzerland: Donald Trump: 100 Days Already, but How Many Years?

     

Austria: Donald Trump Revives the Liberals in Canada

Germany: Absolute Arbitrariness

Israel: Trump’s National Security Adviser Forgot To Leave Personal Agenda at Home and Fell

Mexico: The Trump Problem

Related Articles

Mexico: The Trump Problem

Taiwan: Making America Great Again and Taiwan’s Crucial Choice

Venezuela: Vietnam: An Outlet for China

Germany: US Companies in Tariff Crisis: Planning Impossible, Price Increases Necessary

Hong Kong: Can US Tariffs Targeting Hong Kong’s ‘Very Survival’ Really Choke the Life out of It?