Uranium Enrichment in North Korea

Published in Sankei Shimbun
(Japan) on 23 November 2010
by (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Stephen Barlow. Edited by Gillian Palmer.
Recently, former director of the Los Alamos National Laboratory and nuclear specialist Siegfried Hecker had the opportunity to visit North Korea's newly established, large-scale uranium enrichment facility. He later claimed that the facility has 2,000 running centrifuges. Hecker also reported that if converted, the facility could produce a maximum of two nuclear bombs within a year.

This isn't just about the six-party talks' joint agreement over North Korea's nuclear disarmament in 2005; the recent nuclear tests are a clear violation of sanctions placed on them by the U.N. Security Council in 2006 and 2009.

Heightening the tension on a weakened set of sanctions is just the same old brinkmanship tactics from the Cold War. However, allowing the situation against such an open threat to get this bad will not earn us any advantage.

What is important now is fortifying the alliance between Japan, South Korea and the United States. Currently, Stephen Bosworth, a special representative of the U.S. State Department on North Korean affairs, is conferencing with Kim Seong-hwan, South Korea's minister of diplomacy and trade, and Seiji Maehara, Japan's Foreign Minister, over possible countermeasures. All three countries together must either repel this threat with resolute conviction or look at North Korea's aims more closely and craft the most effective countermeasures.

The current situation is not a surprise, though, after North Korea declared the success of their uranium enrichment test in September of last year. The problem is the high probability that they will accelerate the enrichment process after somehow slipping through the almost impenetrable net of sanctions placed by the U.N., along with those placed independently by the Japanese and American governments, to get the materials they needed.

Compared to the plutonium-type nuclear bomb used in North Korea's last two tests, the uranium type explosive is not necessarily aiming at experiments in easy militarization. On the other hand, the large concentration of uranium needed in the centrifuges, more than 90 percent of their resources, requires advanced technology. Over and over again, suspicions have been raised against North Korea over their cooperation with Iran in nuclear development. Might there be a hole in the siege wall that we've built around North Korea? The international community needs to verify this right now.

Recently, North Korea has begun preparations for their third nuclear test. Also, secretary general Kim Jong-il confirmed that his third son, Kim Jong-un, would act as his successor. It is essential that we draw out his external support. This seems like the most effective way for South Korea, Japan and the U.S. to shake things up.

Recently, the reconciliatory policy of China, which is the current chair in the six-party talks, toward North Korea has become conspicuous. On the 23rd, Bosworth will be heading to Beijing, and he should tell them that economic assistance to North Korea is the same as permitting their lawlessness.

Since the sinking of one of South Korea's patrol boats in March of this year, America and South Korea have begun combined military exercises with the Maritime Self Defense Force participating as an observer. Such cooperation has been very successful. South Korea, Japan and the United States must not become panicked by the North Korean threat.


【主張】北のウラン濃縮 日米韓で脅しはねつけよ 

北朝鮮が、新設の大規模ウラン濃縮施設を核専門家のヘッカー元米ロスアラモス国立研究所長に見せ、「2千基の遠心分離機が稼働中」と主張した。ヘッカー氏は「事実とすれば、年間で最大2発分の核爆弾製造が可能」と報告している。
 これは、北朝鮮が核廃棄に同意した2005年の6カ国協議共同声明だけでなく、北の核実験実施を受けて国連安保理が06年と09年に採択した制裁決議に明白に違反する。
 緊張感を高めて制裁を骨抜きにする、いつもの瀬戸際戦術である。露骨な威嚇に乗じられてはなるまい。
 日米韓の3カ国の結束を固めることが重要だ。米国務省のボズワース北朝鮮担当特別代表は韓国の金星煥外交通商相や前原誠司外相と対応策を協議した。脅しをはねつける断固とした姿勢を示す一方、北の狙いを冷静に分析し、最も効果的な対抗措置を構築しなければならない。
 北朝鮮は昨年9月にも「ウラン濃縮実験成功」と表明しており、今回の事態は予想できた。問題は、北が安保理の制裁決議や日米などの独自制裁によって核関連物資を入手しにくくなった包囲網をかいくぐり、ウラン濃縮を加速させた可能性が高いことだ。
 北朝鮮が過去2回実験したプルトニウム型核爆弾に比べ、ウラン型は起爆が容易で兵器化に向けた実験は必ずしも必要ではない。その代わり、90%以上にまでウランを濃縮する遠心分離機など高度な技術が要求される。しばしば浮上する北朝鮮とイランとの核開発技術協力の疑惑も含め、対北包囲網に欠陥がなかったか、国際社会は検証する必要がある。
 北朝鮮は最近、3度目の核実験の準備ともみられる動きも見せた。金正日総書記から三男、正恩氏への後継体制を固めるには外部からの援助引き出しが不可欠だ。そのためには日米韓を揺さぶるのが効果的と考えたのだろう。
 最近、6カ国協議の議長役である中国の対北融和策が目立つ。23日に北京に向かうボズワース氏は、経済援助が北朝鮮の無法を許す結果を生むと直言すべきだ。
 今年3月に起きた北朝鮮による韓国海軍哨戒艦撃沈事件を受けた米韓合同軍事演習には海上自衛隊もオブザーバー参加した。こうした連携は効果的だ。日米韓は北の脅しにあわててはならない。
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Switzerland: Donald Trump: 100 Days Already, but How Many Years?

     

Austria: Donald Trump Revives the Liberals in Canada

Austria: Musk, the Man of Scorched Earth

Mexico: EU: Concern for the Press

Israel: Trump’s National Security Adviser Forgot To Leave Personal Agenda at Home and Fell

Topics

Mexico: EU: Concern for the Press

Austria: Musk, the Man of Scorched Earth

Germany: Cynicism, Incompetence and Megalomania

Switzerland: Donald Trump: 100 Days Already, but How Many Years?

     

Austria: Donald Trump Revives the Liberals in Canada

Germany: Absolute Arbitrariness

Israel: Trump’s National Security Adviser Forgot To Leave Personal Agenda at Home and Fell

Mexico: The Trump Problem

Related Articles

Japan: US Administration Losing Credibility 3 Months into Policy of Threats

Japan: US-Japan Defense Minister Summit: US-Japan Defense Chief Talks Strengthen Concerns about Single-Minded Focus on Strength

Japan: Trump’s Tariffs Threaten To Repeat Historical Mistakes

Hong Kong: China, Japan, South Korea Pave Way for Summit Talks; Liu Teng-Chung: Responding to Trump

Japan: Partial Cease-fire: Avoid Putin’s Pace

1 COMMENT

  1. Another “diplomatic” saber-rattling article, based on the axiom that the United Nations must be obeyed (except, of course, when the United States doesn’t agree with it). I love the way that this paper, and thousands before it, assumes we’ll click our heels and salute when the United Nations is some sort of universal law.

    If true, why is the United States against the International Criminal Court? And a few more questions: does Japan have nuclear weapons? Does India? Does Pakistan? Does Saudi Arabia?

    Crickets….