The Conflict Beneath the US-Cuba Detente

Published in Beijing News
(China) on 24 July 2015
by Chu Yin (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Nathan Hsu. Edited by Alison Lacey.
To a large extent, the rapprochement between the United States and Cuba stems from a U.S. desire to re-establish its presence in Latin America, and it is likely that the coming revitalization of the Cuban economy will bring with it intensifying competition between the two nations in the region.

In recent weeks, the reopening of U.S.-Cuba relations has been a focal point among the international community. While the move was certainly a historic achievement for the Obama administration and a decisive step on Cuba's journey to reform and openness, buried amid onlookers’ approbation exist several deep-seated points of conflict that have perhaps not received as much attention as they might warrant.

The first issue is how to wipe the slate clean from decades of pent-up animosity. Attitudes of Cuban expatriates toward Cuba are rather distinct from those of overseas Chinese toward China. In the early stages of Chinese reform, change was made possible primarily by investments originating from Chinese living in Southeast Asia. Although certain political differences existed between Southeast Asian-based Chinese and those in mainland China, there was no direct conflict of interest, much less a historical grudge to overcome. The long-endured political slights of being a second-class citizen for those living in Southeast Asia also helped to a certain degree in turning their thoughts toward their motherland. Cuba's present situation stands in stark contrast to the Chinese experience, as Cuban expatriates are, by and large, U.S.-based political refugees and their descendants. They have unresolved property disputes with and a historical hatred of the Cuban government, and moreover enjoy the backing of the United States. Accordingly, it will be considerably difficult for the Cuban government to successfully manage affairs with its expatriate community. On one hand, it wishes to entice them to invest in their homeland, while on the other the government must remain wary against the possibility of counterrevolution.

The second point of conflict is the [in]compatibility of the U.S. and Cuban economic frameworks. Cuba boasts the finest education system and best medical care in Latin America. Despite being isolated for decades by the United States, the island nation has already basically formed a modernized industrial base. Once it draws in foreign investment through reforms and openness, conditions both within and without the country will be primed for Cuba to become the Singapore of Latin America. It will more likely come to achieve breakthroughs in the high-tech industry than turn into a manual labor-intensive manufacturing base, and more likely become a competitor to the United States in those fields in the medium and long term than a simple downstream processing area.

The third point of conflict is between U.S. strategic designs and lofty Cuban ambitions. Cuba has always striven to become a leader in Latin America, and indeed, even were today's Cuba less economically robust, it occupies a unique position within Latin America that cannot be overlooked. Apart from Colombia, Mexico, and a minority of other nations that favor the United States, most states in the region are currently more or less of a far more leftward bend. Cuban reform and openness is a measure that the Cuban government has undertaken in order to realize its ambition of becoming a leading state in Latin America. And as the rapprochement between the United States and Cuba to a large extent stems from a U.S. desire to reestablish its presence in Latin America, with its endgame being to bring Cuba into the fold and reshape U.S. influence within the region, it is likely that the coming revitalization of the Cuban economy will bring with it intensifying competition between the two nations.

Some worry that the normalization of relations between the United States and Cuba will see China's investments in Cuba come to naught. This is actually an undue concern, as the deep-seated conflicts between the two nations not only will not be resolved anytime soon, but on the contrary will become increasingly apparent as Cuba progresses toward reform and openness. This will make Cuba value its singular relationship with China even more. And from a long-term perspective, warming U.S.-Cuba trade relations will make for a convenient springboard for Chinese exports into the United States. So long as the Cuban government is able to draw sufficient experience from the Chinese model, it, the United States, and China will be set to build a peaceful state of coexistence in Latin America.

Chu Yin is an associate professor at the University of International Relations in Beijing and research fellow at the Center for China and Globalization


  美国与古巴的复交在很大程度上出于重返拉美的目的,可以说,未来随着古巴的经济振兴,两者在拉美的竞争可能还有加剧之势。
  近段时间,美国古巴复交成为了国际社会的热点。毫无疑问,这也是奥巴马政府的历史性成就,也是古巴走向改革开放决定性的一步,但是在外界一片点赞之余,一些深层次的矛盾可能尚未得到足够的关注。
  第一个矛盾,是历史旧账如何清算的矛盾。古巴与海外古巴侨民的关系不同于中国与华侨的关系。中国在改革开放初期,主要是通过东南亚地区华侨华人 的回国投资来破局。东南亚华人与中国大陆地区,虽然存在一定政治分歧,但并无直接的利益冲突,更不存在历史仇恨。其在东南亚长期二等公民的政治地位也在一 定程度上强化了他们对祖国大陆的依恋。古巴的情况与此大不相同,因为古巴侨民多为在美的政治难民及其后代。他们与古巴政府有财产纠纷,有历史仇恨,而且背 后还有美国撑腰。所以古巴政府成功处理与古巴侨民的难度很大。一方面是吸引他们还乡投资的问题,另一方面则是警惕他们回国变天的问题。
  第二个矛盾,是美古经济结构兼容性的问题。古巴是拉丁美洲教育程度最高、医疗福利最好的国家。虽然遭遇了美国长期的经济封锁,但是这个国家的现 代化工业基础已经基本成形。一旦改革开放引入外资,古巴完全具备成为拉丁美洲新加坡的内外条件。它更有可能成为一个在高新技术产业上有所突破的国家,而非 人力密集型的制造业基地。它更有可能在中长时期内成为美国相关行业的竞争者,而非下游的加工厂。
  第三个矛盾,则是美国的战略设计与古巴雄心的矛盾。古巴一直致力于做拉丁美洲的领袖,事实上即便今天古巴的经济情况较为窘迫,它在拉丁美洲也具 有不容忽视的地位。目前拉美地区除了哥伦比亚、墨西哥等少数国家是亲美国家之外,其他国家都或多或少地带有左派色彩。古巴的改革开放,是古巴政府为了实现 古巴在拉丁美洲成为领导国家而采取的措施。而美国与古巴的复交则在很大程度上出于重返拉美的目的,它的最终目的是将古巴置于美国的影响之下,重塑美国对于 拉美地区的影响力。可以说,未来随着古巴的经济振兴,两者在拉美的竞争可能还有加剧之势。
  一些人总担心,美古复交会让中国对古巴的投入打了水漂。这其实有些多虑,因为美古两国的深层次矛盾不仅不会消除,反而会随着古巴的进一步改革开 放而日益凸显。这会让古巴更加珍惜与重视中古两国的特殊关系。从长远来看,古巴与美国经贸关系的升温,可能会为中国经济向美国输出提供更加便捷的跳板。只 要古巴政府能够从中国模式里吸取足够的经验,那么古、美、中三方将更有可能在拉美形成一种和谐相处的局面。
储殷(国际关系学院副教授、中国与全球化智库研究员)
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Switzerland: Donald Trump: 100 Days Already, but How Many Years?

     

Austria: Donald Trump Revives the Liberals in Canada

Mexico: The Trump Problem

Venezuela: Vietnam: An Outlet for China

Germany: Absolute Arbitrariness

Topics

Mexico: EU: Concern for the Press

Austria: Musk, the Man of Scorched Earth

Germany: Cynicism, Incompetence and Megalomania

Switzerland: Donald Trump: 100 Days Already, but How Many Years?

     

Austria: Donald Trump Revives the Liberals in Canada

Germany: Absolute Arbitrariness

Israel: Trump’s National Security Adviser Forgot To Leave Personal Agenda at Home and Fell

Mexico: The Trump Problem

Related Articles

Austria: Donald Trump Revives the Liberals in Canada

Mexico: The Trump Problem

Taiwan: Making America Great Again and Taiwan’s Crucial Choice

Venezuela: Vietnam: An Outlet for China

Germany: US Companies in Tariff Crisis: Planning Impossible, Price Increases Necessary

1 COMMENT

  1. I still see the conflict between the capitalist United States and ” socialist ” Cuba from the perspective of a long time democratic Socialist who never thought for a moment -since the collapse of the Soviet Union- that socialism was a dead ideal and a dead historical movement. There are now legions of corrupt intellectuals in Russia, China, even Cuba who write and talk as if the socialist dream of a saner world order is now beneath contempt.
    50 years of American hostility to Cuba was not based on my country’s solicitude for ” democracy ” and human rights. Remember they assassinated the Marxist president of Chile- democratically elected Salvador Allende. They had no problem with the fascist Pinochet regime in that same country.
    In truth, America still wants to quarantine THE DREAM. The ideals of Socialism haunt the U.S. ruling class.The ideals of socialism are most feared by the leaders of the New Russia and the New China who have betrayed their own youth.
    It sickens me to think that the present leaders of Cuba will view China as their new model. What would Chairman Mao think about all these Chinese billionaires ? He would throw the Little Red Book at them.
    One day the working class of China and Russia will re-awaken. And they will again shake the world.
    Global capitalism is now incompatible not only with basic social justice but with life on earth.
    [http://radicalrons.blogspot.com ]