Is the End of the Blockade Approaching?

Published in Prensa Libre
(Guatemala) on 25 February 2009
by Haroldo Shetemul (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Elena Muzzi. Edited by .
While the village dispute in Guatemala over the Order of the Quetzal (the Guatemalan unit of currency) to Fidel Castro was sinking to lower and more depressing levels, something important was taking place in the international sphere related to Cuba. Without major waves, a North American senator was making a revolutionary proposal that would be able to modify dramatically the U.S. trade embargo against the island. Richard Lugar stressed the categorical failure of the embargo because, instead of achieving democratic openness, what it did was strengthen the communist regime.

This proposal is nothing special except for the fact that the person who suggests it is a member of the same Republican Party that led to power George W. Bush, who, in the last eight years, deepened restrictions against Cuba. Who would imagine that a self-criticism so severe would arise from the same Republican party and give backing to Barack Obama's promise of revising his policy toward the island. "After 47 years, however, the unilateral embargo on Cuba has failed to achieve its stated purpose of bringing democracy to the Cuban people," expressed Lugar during his presentation of the report titled “Changing the policy towards Cuba in favor of United States national interest," prepared for the U.S. Senate Committee on Foreign Relations.

That document was written by a group of Lugar’s advisors who traveled to Cuba between the 11th and the 14th of January in order to interview authorities of the Cuban government, diplomats, journalists, religious leaders and representatives of civil society. In the report it states: “(The embargo) has not benefited our agenda of national security since Cuba stopped being a credible threat against the security of the United States." That solitary sentence throws overboard the North American policy of the past decades because it proves that the policy does not make sense and has been led more by the interests of the Anti-Castro lobby in Miami.

The report is very direct in signaling that the Obama administration should begin to treat Cuba like they treat other countries and proposes that the “change” occur before the Summit of the Americas, which will take place in Trinidad y Tobago between the 17th and the 19th of April. It is clear that the authors of the report would not have been able to ignore the unprecedented coming together that has placed Havana with Latin America and distanced it from the United States during the last eight years. The risk for Washington would be to magnify that distance throughout the entire sub region.

Nevertheless, the end of the blockade will not be something that occurs overnight. In a very discrete way, a group of congressmen have submitted bills that will try to lift all the travel restrictions on North Americans to Cuba. The House of Representatives and the Senate knew of similar bills between 2003 and 2004, but Bush's veto threats halted them. Now it is different, since Lugar, who is very close to Obama, is one of the sponsors and knows very well that he would be able to rely on the new government in the blink of an eye. In this way, the day is not far away when the embargo against Cuba will be like the Berlin Wall--only an obscure memory of the Cold War.


MIENTRAS EN GUATEMALA la discusión aldeana sobre la Orden del Quetzal a Fidel Castro caía en sus niveles más bajos y deprimentes, en el ámbito internacional ocurría algo importante relacionado con Cuba. Sin mayores olas, un senador norteamericano hacía un planteamiento revolucionario que podría modificar dramáticamente el bloqueo de EE. UU. contra esa isla. Richard Lugar subrayaba el rotundo fracaso del embargo porque en lugar de lograr una apertura democrática lo que hizo fue afianzar al régimen comunista.


ESE PLANTEAMIENTO no tendría nada de nuevo si no fuera porque quien lo plantea es un miembro del mismo Partido Republicano que llevó al poder a George W. Bush, quien en los últimos ocho años profundizó las restricciones contra Cuba. Quién iba a imaginar que de los mismos republicanos surgiría una autocrítica tan fuerte y que le da un espaldarazo a Barack Obama en promesa de revisar su política hacia esa isla. “Después de 47 años, debemos admitir que el embargo unilateral contra Cuba fracasó en su declarado propósito de llevar la democracia al pueblo cubano”, expresó Lugar en una presentación del informe titulado “Cambiar la política hacia Cuba en pro del interés nacional de Estados Unidos”, elaborado para el Comité de Asuntos Exteriores, del Senado.


ESE DOCUMENTO fue escrito por un grupo de asesores de Lugar que viajó a Cuba entre el 11 y el 14 de enero últimos para entrevistarse con autoridades del gobierno cubano, diplomáticos, periodistas, líderes religiosos y representantes de la sociedad civil. En el informe se afirma: “(el embargo) no ha beneficiado a nuestra agenda de seguridad nacional desde que Cuba dejó de ser una amenaza creíble contra la seguridad de EE. UU.”. Esa sola frase tira por la borda la política norteamericana de las últimas décadas porque evidencia que no tenía sentido y se había guiado más bien por los intereses del lobby anticastrista de Miami.


EL INFORME ES MUY directo al señalar que el gobierno de Obama debe comenzar a tratar a Cuba como lo hace con otros países y propone que ese “cambio” se produzca antes de la Cumbre de las Américas, que se efectuará en Trinidad y Tobago, entre el 17 y 19 de abril próximo. Es claro que los autores del informe no podrían haber obviado el acercamiento sin precedentes que ha tenido La Habana con Latinoamérica y el distanciamiento que ésta ha tenido con EE. UU. en los úlitmos ocho años. El riesgo para Washington sería aumentar esa distancia con toda la subregión.


EL FIN DEL BLOQUEO, sin embargo, no será algo que ocurra de la noche a la mañana. En forma muy discreta un grupo de congresistas ha presentado proyectos de ley que tratarían de levantar todas las restricciones a los viajes de norteamericanos a Cuba. La Cámara de Representantes y el Senado conocieron proyectos similares entre el 2003 y 2004, pero las amenazas de veto por parte de Bush las engavetaron. Ahora es diferente, ya que Lugar, quien es muy cercano a Obama, es uno de los ponentes y sabe muy bien que podría contar con un guiño de ojo del nuevo gobernante. Así, no está lejano el día en que el embargo contra Cuba sea como el Muro de Berlín, solo un oscuro recuerdo de la Guerra Fría.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Australia: Donald Trump Is So Convinced of His Mandate that He Is Battling the Courts

Germany: Trump for the Charlemagne Prize!

Australia: The US’s Biggest Export? Trump’s MAGA Mindset

Australia: Trump’s Tariffs Were Already Ever-Changing. Now, Court Fights Add to the Uncertainty

Topics

Mexico: From Star Wars to Golden Domes

Germany: US Sanctions against the EU

Austria: Whether or Not the Tariffs Are Here to Stay, the Damage Has Already Been Done*

Germany: Trump’s Tariff Policy: ‘Dealmaker’ under Pressure

Austria: Trump’s Peace Is Far Away

Austria: Trump’s Solo Dream Is Over

Mexico: US Pushes for Submission

Poland: Donald Trump’s Delusions about South Africa

Related Articles

Guatemala: Harris and Trump Chose Electoral Polarization

Guatemala: Migration Threatens Purified Trusts

Mexico: Mexico, Guatemala, the US and Migration

Guatemala: A World in Flames

Guatemala: Call to Arms

  1. Good! I have always wanted to go for a vacation in Cuba. It is probably all I can afford nowadays… Heck, I wonder if they will let me retire there? I do have a good Union pension unless they take it from me somehow.

    Costa Rica used to be my goal retirement place until they signed CAFTA. Now, I would not consider it since it will be US controlled.