The Deeper Meaning Behind The Reduction in U.S. Reserve Holdings

Published in People's Daily
(China) on 20 August 2009
by Chen Jiaxing (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Nicholas van Heyst. Edited by Katy Burtner.
According to the latest news, China decreased U.S. foreign debt holdings by 25.1 billion dollars in June. This move made many Chinese citizens happy, yet it put the Americans on alert. The happiness or anxiety that resulted from this action is derived from each party's personal interests. From a Chinese perspective, China has an urgent need to transform the imbalanced situation, which is a result of the composition of foreign reserve holdings. Also, it must ensure that foreign reserves are secure, maintain value or even increase in value.

U.S. national debt appears to be safe and has great liquidity. The dollar also seems to be able to hold value or increase in value. Yet, hidden beneath a layer of smoke, devaluation is evident.

There is an insidious tendency for this national debt to lose value. In this type of situation, the reasonable thing for China to do is to take action in order to decrease its holdings of U.S. debt.
 
To decrease holdings in U.S. debt is also to make known that China is seeking to pluralize foreign reserve holdings. But this act of pluralization is a complex matter. There are two primary aspects to this complex issue. The first is to take a scientific approach toward the assessment of foreign reserve holdings, and to seek out the greatest amount of profit with the least amount of risk. The second is the urgent need to foster talented people who are adept in the rules of this international game, and superbly experienced in management.
 
The consequences of pluralizing foreign reserves is the pluralization of the values of each selection. A specific proportion of U.S. dollars is essential, as this is the fundamental means by which China handles critical international payment, and it is also a tool for dealing with international secret transactions and adjusting to unusual financial actions, such as early debt repayment requests.

A specific proportion of gold is essential. As gold is the natural recourse of state strategy, it is the most stable and most basic form of credit, and at crucial moments it can become a country's formidable economic backup. A specific proportion of other stable currencies--such as the euro, the British pound, the Swiss franc, etc.--are essential, because in the event of the devaluation of the U.S. dollar, this will provide a form of leverage.
 
Apart from the financial qualities, foreign reserves must also have practical qualities. For instance, foreign currency can be used to integrate the global expansion of enterprises or to purchase heavy equipment and sophisticated technology that is essential for national development, or as a resource for international investment strategy and holdings in mega-enterprises. Of course, in the face of the Western nations early establishment of ramparts or "firewalls" to protect technology, this type of action has been rebuffed time and time again. Besides these, there is also always foreign lending, as well as straightforward purchases of land, real-estate and/or large quantities of goods and commodities.
 
The issue at hand is that we need to apply a scientific assessment of the different paths to pluralization of foreign reserves and determine a scientifically sound foreign reserve structuring, while at the same time determining different standards of valuation to different selections. Only in this type of situation can China correctly choose the allocation of new foreign holdings based in proportion to individually determined standards, rather than by making blind or off-the-cuff selections. We must complete the move towards realizing reserve pluralization under a determined scientifically sound structure. When new frontiers need urgent development, one can not just stop because of the risk.

Before this takes place, China's increasing of U.S. national debt holdings is the consequence of not having the ability to make another choice. When Chinese investments incur losses or limitations it is a reflection of the lack of talented players on the Chinese side. We must admit that we are not yet that familiar with the rules of this international game. With regards to the use of capital, we are still just primary students. When our moves have been calculated by others, we often do not realize it, even after it happens. When we are faced with the big sharks of international finance ready to make trouble, it is possible that we will remain completely unaware. And all this shows the urgent need to build a talent base that is well adept in international finance and strategic investment, as well as operations and management.

Foreign reserves are the wealth of the nation. It is only natural that the public direct their utmost attention to its security. Yet, at the same time, the use of foreign reserves is something that needs to be concealed for the purposes of state strategy. Consequently, for the department concerned, in order to dispel the public's concerns and doubts and balance trust and understanding, the question becomes: How can one still conceal one’s strategic intentions to the greatest degree?


 据最新消息,中国6月份减持251亿美元美国国债。此举令国人高兴,美国则对此“警惕”。一喜一忧背后,是从各自利益出发所进行的考量。从中国人的角度来看,中国面临的是亟需改变外储结构的失衡局面,以确保外储安全、保值乃至增值。

美国国债看起来安全、流动性强,既保值还能增值。但在这层烟雾之下,美元贬值


  趋势在无形中使其国债贬值。在这种情势下,中国减持美国国债实乃情理之中。


  减持美国国债还表明,中国正在寻求外储多元化。但这种多元化亦是一个复杂的课题,目前面临的主要问题至少有两个方面:一个是对外储结构进行科学的价值评估,以求实现利益最大化、风险最小化。一个是亟需培养熟谙国际游戏规则、具备丰富经营经验的人才。


  外储多元的背后是价值选择的多元。必须保有一定比例的美元,因为这是中国具备紧急国际支付能力的基本手段,以应对国际热钱抽逃、要求提前偿债等金融异动。必须储备一定比例的黄金,是因为黄金是国家的战略资源,具有最稳定、最基础的信用,在关键时刻能够成为国家经济的强大后盾。必须持有一定比例的其他稳定货币,比如欧元、英镑、瑞士法郎等,这样才能和美元贬值形成对冲以实现保值。


  除此货币金融形态之外,外储还应当走向实体形态。比如,把外储运用与企业“走出去”结合起来,或购买国家发展亟需的大型设备、高端技术等,或在国外投资战略资源、控股超强企业。当然,在西方国家早就建立的技术壁垒和“防火墙”面前,此举已屡屡碰壁。此外还有诸如贷款给其他国家,以及直接购买地产、房产,其他大宗商品等。


  现在的问题是,我们应当对外储的这些多元渠道进行科学评估,确定科学合理的外储结构,同时针对不同的选择确定不同的评价标准。在这种情况下,中国的外储选择就能够按各自确定的比例合理分配新增外汇,减少盲目性和随意性。实现外储多元化,确定其科学合理结构,是我们必须完成的步骤。一些新领域亟需开拓,不能因其冒险而止步。


  此前中国增持美国国债是“没有能力做其他选择”,中国的一些投资遭遇损失或受阻,均显示中国这方面人才的缺乏。应当承认,对有关国际游戏规则,我们还不太熟悉。在资本的运用方面,我们还是小学生。被人算计了,事后往往还不太明白。面对一些国际金融大鳄的蠢蠢欲动,我们可能还浑然不觉。这些都迫切要求精通国际金融实务与战略投资、经营管理的人才。


  外储是国家的财富,公众对其安全保持高度关注是必然的。同时,外储的运用作为国家战略的一部分需要其隐蔽性。因而,有关部门在向公众解疑释惑以取得理解和信任的同时,如何能够最大限度地隐蔽战略意图,也是值得深思的一个问题。(陈家兴)
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Germany: Donald Trump’s Military Intervention in LA Is a Planned Escalation

Germany: Donald Trump Is Damaging the US

Taiwan: Taiwan Issue Will Be Harder To Bypass during Future US-China Negotiations

Canada: President Trump, the G7 and Canada’s New ‘Realistic’ Foreign Policy

Germany: If You’re Not for Him, You Should Be Afraid*

Topics

Germany: If You’re Not for Him, You Should Be Afraid*

Austria: Trump Is Playing with Fire. Does He Want the Whole House To Go up in Flames?

Taiwan: Taiwan Issue Will Be Harder To Bypass during Future US-China Negotiations

Venezuela: The Devil in Los Angeles

Germany: Donald Trump’s Military Intervention in LA Is a Planned Escalation

Mexico: Migration: A Political Crisis?

Poland: Los Angeles Riots: Battle for America’s Future

Germany: Donald Trump Is Damaging the US

Related Articles

Taiwan: Taiwan Issue Will Be Harder To Bypass during Future US-China Negotiations

Hong Kong: Amid US Democracy’s Moral Unraveling, Hong Kong’s Role in the Soft Power Struggle

Russia: Trump Is Shielding America*

Hong Kong: The Lessons of World War II: The Real World Importance of Resisting Hegemony

Mexico: The Trump Problem