Barack Obama did not expect to have to play savior to the European monetary union. And yet, there he was, compelled to call Angela Merkel right in the middle of the European summit to attempt dissuading her from resistance to the rescue plan for indebted member nations. Again, it was Obama calling Spain's José Luis Zapatero to encourage him to make drastic cuts in public spending. In the past, someone would have spoken out against American "interference." But, now, Europe is almost thankful.
The Obama administration is not acting through generosity. It is merely nervous when the Eurozone shows itself to be weak, as America likewise risks undergoing heavy consequences. The euro is tumbling toward a rate of 1.20 in relation to the dollar, already a hard hit for the American export industry. Part of the economic growth of the United States these last three quarters has been tied to a rebound in U.S. exports thanks to a weak dollar. Now, it is European industry's turn to profit from a favorable exchange rate.
Furthermore, the fall of the euro offers an ideal alibi to the Chinese government, the one who forever promises, it could be said, gradual re-valuation of the yuan. American industry loses its margin of competitiveness over its European rivals but gains no ground as it comes face-to-face with China.
However, trade exports are not a huge concern for Obama. Though the European Union is their second market at 15.3 percent of their exports, the United States runs a relatively closed economy. U.S. exports constitute a mere 7.4 percent of the American GDP. Consequently, the sale of "made in the USA" products in the Eurozone constitutes only 1.1 percent of its GDP. Thus, a decline in American exports to Europe will by no means be catastrophic.
What scares Washington most is a growing crisis of confidence in respect to the debts of sovereign states. If Greece is abandoned to its natural fate (bankruptcy), Spain and Portugal will not be able to hold out for long. Next, it will surely be Italy and Great Britain. Will the moment come when Asian investors lose confidence in the solvency of the U.S. Treasury? Now, America's national debt is rapidly increasing, such that it could reach a "mediterranean" rate within a decade. It is better not to test the faith of the markets in U.S. Treasury Bonds.
Just a slight drop in confidence may suffice to force the U.S. Treasury to offer higher returns. The Federal Reserve would likewise be obligated to increase rates. A scary scenario, since the United States still has 15 million unemployed. It is therefore necessary to avoid having Greece, as a country, to become what Lehman Brothers was for banks: the beginning of a cascade effect. That is exactly why Washington is ready to pay a high price. Behind the "generosity" of the International Monetary Fund's in participation in the European plan is the most important player: the United States.
For the American taxpayer, this is all difficult to understand. In the United States, one could conceive of a bankruptcy for California or New York (both are already deeply in debt), without the federal government being obligated to devise a rescue plan. However the U.S. has other means of stabilization. Its central budget makes significant transfers to the States, notably through unemployment benefits and the retirement system (Social Security), a portion of health care (Medicare and Medicaid), the Defense budget, and certain transfers for public education. The fact that a tiny economy such as Greece has a destabilizing force superior to that of California, this is a paradox which, to American eyes, does not reinforce the credibility of the European Union.
Barack Obama n'avait pas prévu de devoir jouer les sauveurs de l'Union monétaire européenne. Et pourtant, le voilà contraint de téléphoner à Angela Merkel au beau milieu d'un sommet européen pour vaincre ses résistances sur le plan d'aide aux pays membres endettés. Voilà M.Obama encore qui téléphone à José Luis Zapatero pour l'encourager à faire des coupes sombres dans les dépenses publiques de l'Espagne. Du jamais-vu. Autrefois, on aurait parlé d'une "ingérence" américaine. Maintenant l'Europe lui est presque reconnaissante.
L'administration Obama n'agit pas par générosité. Elle s'inquiète lorsque l'Eurozone donne une preuve d'impuissance, car l'Amérique risque de subir elle aussi de lourdes conséquences. L'euro qui dégringole vers un taux de 1,20 par rapport au dollar, c'est un coup dur pour l'industrie exportatrice des Etats-Unis. Déjà Mercedes se réjouit d'une augmentation de 22% de ses ventes sur le marché américain. Une partie de la croissance économique aux Etats-Unis, ces trois derniers trimestres, a été le fait d'une reprise des exportations liée au dollar faible. Maintenant c'est au tour de l'industrie européenne de profiter d'un taux de change favorable. De plus, la chute de l'euro offre un alibi parfait au gouvernement chinois : le voilà qui remet aux calendes grecques (c'est le cas de le dire) sa promesse d'une réévaluation graduelle du renminbi. L'industrie américaine perd des marges de compétitivité vers ses concurrents européens, sans en gagner vis-à-vis de la Chine.
Mais le commerce extérieur n'est pas le souci majeur pour M. Obama. Bien que l'Union européenne soit leur deuxième marché avec 15,3% de leurs exportations, les Etats-Unis ont une économie relativement fermée : les exportations ne pèsent que pour 7,4% de leur PIB. Par conséquent, les ventes de produits "made in USA" dans l'Eurozone ne font que 1,1% du PIB américain. Un recul des exportations américaines ne sera pas catastrophique.
Washington craint davantage la contagion d'une crise de confiance envers les dettes des Etats souverains. Si on abandonne la Grèce à son destin naturel (la banqueroute), le Portugal et l'Espagne ne résisteront pas longtemps. Après ce sera sans doute au tour de l'Italie et de la Grande-Bretagne. Le moment viendra-t-il où les investisseurs asiatiques n'auront plus confiance dans la solvabilité du Trésor des Etats-Unis ? Car la dette publique américaine augmente vite. Elle atteindra un niveau "méditerranéen" en une décennie. Il vaut mieux ne pas mettre à l'épreuve la foi des marchés dans les Treasury Bonds.
Une légère baisse de confiance peut suffire pour contraindre le Trésor de Washington à offrir des rendements plus élevés. La Federal Reserve serait, elle aussi, obligée d'augmenter des taux. C'est un scénario redoutable, car les Etats-Unis ont encore 15 millions de chômeurs. Il faut donc éviter que la Grèce soit parmi les nations ce que fut Lehman Brothers pour les banques : le déclenchement d'un effet de cascade. Voilà pourquoi Washington est disponible à payer le prix fort. Derrière la "générosité" du Fonds monétaire international qui est partie prenante du plan européen, il y a les Etats-Unis qui en sont l'actionnaire plus important.
Pour le contribuable américain, tout cela est incompréhensible. Aux Etats-Unis, on pourrait concevoir une faillite de la Californie ou de l'Etat de New York (tous les deux surendettés), sans que le gouvernement fédéral soit obligé d'organiser un sauvetage. Mais la République fédérale américaine a d'autres instruments de stabilisation. Son budget central effectue des transferts importants vers les Etats : notamment à travers les indemnités de chômage et le système des retraites (Social Security), une partie des soins de santé (Medicare et Medicaid), le budget de la Défense et certains transferts pour l'Education nationale. Le fait qu'une économie minuscule comme celle de la Grèce ait une force de déstabilisation supérieure à celle de la Californie, voilà un paradoxe qui ne renforce pas la crédibilité de l'Union européenne aux yeux des Américains.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link
.
U.S. companies, importers and retailers will bear the initial costs which most economists expect to filter through the supply chain as a cost-push inflation.
The U.S. must decide what type of foreign policy it wants to pursue: one based on the humanism of Abraham Lincoln or one based on the arrogance of those who want it to be the world’s policeman.
U.S. companies, importers and retailers will bear the initial costs which most economists expect to filter through the supply chain as a cost-push inflation.
lose confidence in the solvency of the U.S. Treasury?…what solvency?…they’re already loaning money they print up, to themselves…
We have been cutting taxes drastically on the wealthy classes in the U.S., ever since Ronald Reagan, and they hold almost all of our GDP.
At the same time, we have devastated our middle class by allowing our manufacturing to be outsourced to other countries, & dropping our tariffs so they could still sell in the U.S. domestic markets, further eroding any industries attempting to stay and employ here in the U.S.
The end result?…our federal government refuses to reinstate the pre-Reagan tax structure on the rich, so no dough there…the middle class is hanging on by it’s fingernails, and as you can’t squeeze blood from a stone, no tax revenue left there…
…and our federal government has been running on borrowed money for about 30 years, due to this “Ayn Rand” stupidity…which only goes to show you shouldn’t mistake a poorly written & verbose science fiction story for an economics textbook.
The states are in debt from the loss of middle class taxes, and the feds have no discretionary money to prop them up with. The feds are already cutting back on Social Security, and the wealthy are making “don’t pay it back at all” noises, because they know where the money would have to come from.
This thing’s going to let loose, and I don’t think anyone can stop it…and it was all due to greed & rampant, unregulated self-interest.
Thinking that the U.S. can help build a solid foundation for a world-wide economic recovery is just building your house on sand.
lose confidence in the solvency of the U.S. Treasury?…what solvency?…they’re already loaning money they print up, to themselves…
We have been cutting taxes drastically on the wealthy classes in the U.S., ever since Ronald Reagan, and they hold almost all of our GDP.
At the same time, we have devastated our middle class by allowing our manufacturing to be outsourced to other countries, & dropping our tariffs so they could still sell in the U.S. domestic markets, further eroding any industries attempting to stay and employ here in the U.S.
The end result?…our federal government refuses to reinstate the pre-Reagan tax structure on the rich, so no dough there…the middle class is hanging on by it’s fingernails, and as you can’t squeeze blood from a stone, no tax revenue left there…
…and our federal government has been running on borrowed money for about 30 years, due to this “Ayn Rand” stupidity…which only goes to show you shouldn’t mistake a poorly written & verbose science fiction story for an economics textbook.
The states are in debt from the loss of middle class taxes, and the feds have no discretionary money to prop them up with. The feds are already cutting back on Social Security, and the wealthy are making “don’t pay it back at all” noises, because they know where the money would have to come from.
This thing’s going to let loose, and I don’t think anyone can stop it…and it was all due to greed & rampant, unregulated self-interest.
Thinking that the U.S. can help build a solid foundation for a world-wide economic recovery is just building your house on sand.