How Can China and America’s Militaries Make Their Interaction More Amicable?

Published in Huanqiu
(China) on 6 January 2011
by Yang Yi (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Sharon Chiao. Edited by Hoishan Chan.
U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates will be visiting China on Jan. 9, 2011. This not only signals that Chinese and American military ties have returned to normal, but is also heavily influential towards encouraging Sino-U.S. relations to move in the direction of positive development.

At the beginning of 2010, America sold large quantities of military equipment to Taiwan. This seriously damaged Sino-U.S. relations, and especially damaged the political atmosphere of normal military relations between these two countries. It was not easy, but through cooperative efforts from both sides, their relationship has finally returned to the way it was prior to the arms sale. Gates’ visit this time can encourage better understanding between Sino-American troops and actively reduce misconceptions. However, it will be very difficult to solve the structural contradictions within Sino-U.S. military interactions in one go.

To encourage more amicable Sino-U.S. military ties, solving problems such as “fulfilling commitments, expanding cooperation, mutual tolerance, bilateral transparency, etc.” is necessary.

Fulfilling commitments is the political basis for maintaining Sino-U.S. relations; that is, fulfilling political commitments to each other. The three joint communiqués and the signed 2009 U.S.-China Joint Statement concretely reflect the political commitments made by both sides to strictly abide to the spirit of these four important documents. Both sides will also fulfill their political commitments through their actions and not just through their words. In addition, there is the commitment to not challenge or harm each other’s core interests in order to guarantee steady development in U.S.–China relations. This can also ensure that U.S.–China military relations are not affected by periodic conflicts. Currently, the main obstacles influencing U.S.–China military relations are: the U.S. persistently selling weapons to Taiwan, the U.S. Congress’ National Defense Authorization Act in 2000 that limits interactions between the two militaries and the frequent reconnaissance along China’s coasts by U.S. aircrafts and ships.

Expanding cooperation between the Chinese and U.S. militaries is working together to maintain regional and global safety, peace, stability and prosperity by implementing effective cooperative efforts. As the world’s top two economic entities, America and China’s common interests increase day by day. The areas of military cooperation and future prospects of military cooperation between these two countries are very extensive. Currently, the most urgent matter, which is also the easiest to implement, is working together to combat non-traditional security threats and challenges. Through fighting pirates, offering humanitarian aid and providing disaster relief, the U.S. and Chinese militaries not only can work together, but they can also complement and learn from each other. With the gradual maturity of these conditions, cooperation can expand to the realm of traditional safety, such as working together to maintain safety and smooth sailing on the high seas and managing and controlling regional crises, etc. Through strengthening their cooperation, the relationship between both militaries will slowly solidify and become more capable of withstanding trouble.

Mutual tolerance is admitting that neither side challenges the other’s reasonable and appropriate space and rights, which includes the development of military strength. China’s People’s Liberation Army is weak, and has no intention of challenging America’s regional and global military superiority. There are no strategic goals of becoming a regional military hegemony. The only purpose China has in modernizing their military strength is to protect their national security, interests and development of interests. At the same time they can provide safety as “public goods” for the international community. China is pursuing governmental policies that will allow them to be “harmonious, safe and prosperous neighbors” to surrounding countries. They have never and will never use military strength to bully the weak. The world, the Pacific Ocean and the Atlantic Ocean are big enough to accommodate the development and operations of both Chinese and American militaries. Strengthening military-military communications at all levels, strengthening strategic trust and eradicating a zero-sum attitude can create a win-win situation for all.

Bilateral transparency is both sides showing the other that they have strategic plans to work together and not to challenge each other, rather than merely requiring the other side to show specific plans for development of military strength. The nature and mission of military forces is to prepare for the worst case scenario; however, a lack of transparent strategic developments and use of military strength will lead to a security dilemma situation.

Currently, the reason Chinese and American troops lack in strategic trust is because the U.S. possesses an incomparable, superior military that recently has been continually strengthening its alliances in the Asia-Pacific region, adjusting the deployment of military forces and repeatedly selling arms to Taiwan. At the same time, they are uniting all Western countries to implement a weapons and military technology embargo on China. This gives the impression that America views the PLA as a potential opponent that they need to be vigilant against. They are thus unwilling to see a strengthening of China’s military. Under these circumstances, how can we allow China’s army, which is under immense pressures, to become open-minded and more transparent? Despite this, China is continually improving the military’s transparency. For instance, they regularly publish their Defense White Papers, they have opened up their Department of Defense website, they have opened up new military facilities to visits from foreign military personnel, etc.

Henceforth, we can still do better. A more transparent, trusting and open Chinese military can better resolve concerns. If Sino-U.S. troops are to strengthen mutual strategic trust, then both militaries must push for friendlier interactions.


摘要:当前中美两军战略互信缺失的原因是美国在全球拥有难以比拟的军事优势,近来在亚太地区不断地强化军事同盟,调整军事力量部署,不断向台湾出售武器,同时联合所有西方国家对中国实行军事武器和军事技术的禁运,给人们的印象就是美国把中国人民解放军当作了潜在的作战对手加以防范,不愿看到中国军事力量的增强。

  美国国防部长盖茨将于2011年1月9日来华访问,这不仅标志着中美两军关系回转到正常交往的轨道,也将对促进中美两国整体关系朝着积极的方向发展具有重要影响。


  2010年初,美国决定向台湾出售大量军事装备,严重冲击了中美两国关系,尤其是破坏了两军关系正常交往的政治氛围。经过双方的共同努力,现在终于峰回路转,实属不易。盖茨此次访问能够为促进中美两军的相互了解和降低误解发挥积极作用,但是却很难一劳永逸地解决中美两军关系互动中的结构性矛盾。


  为了促进中美两军关系的良性互动,需要解决“履行承诺、扩大合作、相互包容、双向透明”等重大问题。


  履行承诺,就是维护中美两国关系的政治基础,履行各自向对方的政治承诺。中美两国三个联合公报和2009年签订的中美联合声明具体体现了中美双方相互之间所做的政治承诺,严格遵守上述四个重要文件的精神,在行动上而不是仅仅在口头上履行政治承诺,不挑战、不损害对方的核心利益,就能保证中美两国关系平稳发展,也就能够确保中美两军关系不受到周期性的冲击。当前影响中美军事关系的主要的障碍就是美国坚持不断对台湾军售、美国国会2000年国防授权法对两军交往的限制,以及美国军机、舰艇对中国沿海的频繁抵近侦察。


  扩大合作,就是中美两军在共同维护地区和全球的安全、和平、稳定与繁荣方面进行有效的合作。作为当今世界的第一和第二大经济体,中美两国拥有的共同利益在日益增多,两军合作的领域和前景都很宽广,当前最迫切也是最容易进行的是共同应对各种非传统安全威胁与挑战。中美两军在打击海盗、人道主义援助、抢险救灾中不但可以合作,还可以优势互补,相互借鉴。随着条件的逐步成熟,可以扩大到传统安全领域,如共同维护海上通道的安全、畅通,地区危机管理与控制等等。通过强化合作,两军的关系就可以逐渐牢固,就比较能够经得起风吹草动。


  相互包容,就是承认并不挑战对方合理的、相应的空间和权利,包括军事力量的发展。中国人民解放军没有能力,更没有意图要挑战美国的地区和全球军事优势,没有任何追求地区军事霸权的战略目标,中国的军事力量现代化唯一的目的是保卫国家安全利益和发展利益,同时为国际社会提供安全“公众产品”。中国奉行“睦邻、安邻、富邻”的周边政策,从来不,今后也永远不会使用军事力量以强凌弱。世界足够大,太平洋足够大,西太平洋足够大,能够容得下中美两国军事力量的发展和行动。加强两军的各层次的交往,增强相互战略信任,铲除“零和”心态,营造共赢局面。


  双向透明,就是互相向对方展现要合作而不要对抗的战略意图,而不是仅仅是要求对方展示军事发展能力的具体规划。军事力量的性质和使命决定了都要为最坏的情况做准备,但是,缺乏战略透明地发展和运用军事力量会导致陷入“安全两难”的困境。


  当前中美两军战略互信缺失的原因是美国在全球拥有难以比拟的军事优势,近来在亚太地区不断地强化军事同盟,调整军事力量部署,不断向台湾出售武器,同时联合所有西方国家对中国实行军事武器和军事技术的禁运,给人们的印象就是美国把中国人民解放军当作了潜在的作战对手加以防范,不愿看到中国军事力量的增强。在这种情况下怎能让承受巨大压力的中国军队敞开胸怀进行透明呢?尽管如此,中国还是不断地改善自己的军事透明度,例如定期发表国防白皮书、开放国防部网站、开放新的军事设施供外国军事人员参观等。


  今后我们还可以做得更好,一个更加透明、自信与开放的中国军事力量会更好地化解疑虑,中美两军在增强战略互信中必将促进两军关系的良性互动。
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Canada: President Trump, the G7 and Canada’s New ‘Realistic’ Foreign Policy

Mexico: Migration: A Political Crisis?

Mexico: Big Tech and the Police State

Germany: Friedrich Merz’s Visit to Trump Succeeded because It Didn’t Fail

Topics

Germany: Donald Trump’s Military Intervention in LA Is a Planned Escalation

Mexico: Migration: A Political Crisis?

Poland: Los Angeles Riots: Battle for America’s Future

Germany: Donald Trump Is Damaging the US

Canada: President Trump, the G7 and Canada’s New ‘Realistic’ Foreign Policy

Taiwan: The Beginning of a Post-Hegemonic Era: A New Normal for International Relations

Canada: Trump vs. Musk, the Emperor and the Oligarch

Mexico: Big Tech and the Police State

Related Articles

Hong Kong: Amid US Democracy’s Moral Unraveling, Hong Kong’s Role in the Soft Power Struggle

Russia: Trump Is Shielding America*

Hong Kong: The Lessons of World War II: The Real World Importance of Resisting Hegemony

Mexico: The Trump Problem

Taiwan: Making America Great Again and Taiwan’s Crucial Choice