Violence: Obama and Osama?

Published in Panama America
(Panama) on 30 January 2013
by Alejandro A. Tagliavini (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Bianca Fierro. Edited by Kathleen Weinberger.
The film is collated to discuss a theme with a certain historical perspective. Even though a slight doubt remains, I want to believe and will continue to support my thesis that bin Laden was assassinated by the U.S. government. Acts of torture and assassinations are completely useless, as they always are, given that al-Qaida and the Taliban continue to control territory and to attack others constantly.

There exists a very primitive and extended idea that once a murderer is dead or a robber is jailed, the crime will be over. Instead, after centuries of killing murderers and jailing robbers, these crimes still exist. For instance, World War II caused more deaths (60 million, eight times the present population of Israel) than what Hitler would have accomplished before being felled with his own weight. Furthermore, this war served to establish the worst evil empire, the USSR, which — while being even more powerful than Nazism — fell on its own without any bloodshed.

The Vietnam War (which left 60,000 American causalities, less than those who were murdered for a criminal offense since Chavez installed his statist country) was created as a fight against communism in a country that today turns in peace toward capitalism, following its own interests and convictions. This clearly demonstrates that wars do not follow an exact ideology, much less a moral one.

This violent culture is rooted even in the 21st century; evidence of this is Obama’s Nobel Peace Prize. Even though he assured the public during his most recent inaugural address that, “We, the people, still believe that enduring security and lasting peace do not require perpetual war,” he has openly promoted homicides and war, and has said that evil exists. In other words, he believes in evil despite science and empirical evidence.

Obama needs to believe in evil, because he is the Commander in Chief: taxes, laws, regulations, borders, coercively imposed customs using monopolies that the state assumes — this is violence that is contrary to nature, to goodness. Wars, homicides and acts of torture are all necessary and functional for the state, and yet these are also acts of violence (that is why the “pacifists” of the left parties are labeled as wrong). If these impositions, such as borders and customs, did not exist, and if the market (the free and voluntary cooperation between people) would prevail in the world, peace would be the inevitable result.


“Zero Dark Thirty” es una película lamentable que no recomiendo. Y es altamente inmoral, porque hace apología de la guerra, la tortura y el homicidio.

“Zero Dark Thirty” es una película lamentable que no recomiendo. Y es altamente inmoral, porque hace apología de la guerra, la tortura y el homicidio. Pero viene a colación para discutir un tema con cierta perspectiva histórica. Aunque un mínimo de duda queda, quiero creer y sirve para mi tesis que Bin Laden fue asesinado por el Gobierno de EE.UU. Torturas y asesinatos totalmente inútiles, como siempre resultan serlo, ya que Al Qaeda y los talibanes siguen controlando territorio y sus ataques son constantes.
Existe la muy primitiva y extendida idea de que muerto el homicida o encarcelado el ladrón, se acabó el delito, pero resulta que van centurias de asesinar a homicidas y encarcelar a ladrones y el delito sigue latente. Por caso, la Segunda Guerra Mundial provocó más muertes (60 millones, 8 veces el actual Estado de Israel) de lo que hubiera logrado Hitler antes de caer por su propio peso, y sirvió para instalar el peor imperio del mal, la URSS, que aún siendo mucho más poderosa que el nazismo, cayó sola sin derramamiento de sangre.
La guerra de Vietnam (que dejó 60,000 bajas americanas, menos que los asesinados por el delito común desde que Chávez implantó su estatismo) se hizo contra el comunismo, que hoy se vuelca en paz hacia el capitalismo por propio interés y convicciones. Demostrando que las guerras no persiguen realmente ningún principio ideológico, y mucho menos moral.
La cultura de la violencia está tan enraizada aún en el siglo XXI, que se la ha otorgado el Nobel de la Paz a Obama, que a pesar de asegurar durante su reciente jura que “seguimos creyendo que una paz duradera no requiere de una guerra perpetua”, abiertamente ha promovido el homicidio y la guerra, y que ha dicho que el mal existe, es decir, que cree en el mal a pesar de la ciencia y la evidencia empírica.
Obama necesita creer en el mal, porque él comanda el estatismo: impuestos, leyes, regulaciones, fronteras, aduanas impuestas coactivamente utilizando el monopolio, que se arroga el Estado, de la violencia que es contraria a la naturaleza, al bien. Las guerras, los homicidios, las torturas son necesarias y funcionales al estatismo, porque este es la violencia (por esto es que son falsos los “pacifistas” de la izquierda estatista). De no existir estas imposiciones, fronteras y aduanas, si el mercado (la cooperación libre y voluntaria entre personas) imperara en el mundo, la paz sería el resultado inevitable.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Germany: What the National Guard Is Really Contributing in Washington*

France: Iran: The United States at an Impasse

India: US, China Playing Dangerous Gen Z Game in Nepal

Canada: Ambassador Peter Hoekstra Fans the Flames of the 51st State Debate

South Africa: US World Cup Shenanigans Exposes Fifa’s Double Standards

Topics

South Africa: US World Cup Shenanigans Exposes Fifa’s Double Standards

Saudi Arabia: The Pro-Israel Lobby and US Military ‘Cooperation’

India: US, China Playing Dangerous Gen Z Game in Nepal

Germany: What the National Guard Is Really Contributing in Washington*

Germany: US Imperial Outpost in Space

Brazil: Terrorism To Suit the Customer’s Taste*

Jordan: War for the Occupation

South Africa: Where’s My Phone? My Golden Trump Phone!

Related Articles

India: Panama and Venezuela, 36 Years Apart: How Bush and Trump Used Law to Break Law

Panama: The World According to Trump

U.K.: Donald Trump’s Imperial Bullying Must Be Nipped in the Bud

Panama: When a Right-Wing President Confronted the United States

Germany: A Deadly Jungle on the Trek to America