China Understands US Space Program Weaknesses, US Needs To Prepare for Conflict

Published in Huanqiu
(China) on 29 January 2016
by Ge Xu and Zhen Li (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Rachel Critelli. Edited by Alison Lacey.
On Jan. 27, the Center for a New American Security in Washington issued a report warning that major adversaries China and Russia have seen through the weaknesses of the U.S. space program. The report called on the Pentagon to reform its strategy in order to prepare for a possible conflict in space with Russia, China and other countries.

The 44-page report, titled “From Sanctuary to Battlefield: A Framework for a U.S. Defense and Deterrence Strategy for Space,” was written by New American Security Center senior fellow Elbridge Colby. Colby previously served in the United States government, and in 2012 was the Chinese policy adviser for presidential candidate Mitt Romney. In the report, China and Russia were often bound together as the United States’ “space adversaries,” and China was mentioned about 20 times.

The report said that China, Russia, and other countries are acquiring capabilities for the containment of United States satellites, such as anti-satellite missiles, and Internet and other electronically based attack methods. Some capabilities may be able to destroy United States satellites, while others may simply be able to render them ineffective. Because of these new anti-satellite capabilities, United States space assets are becoming less effective. The report referred to China’s 2007 anti-satellite experiment as proof of China’s abilities in space and predicted a scenario in which a conflict would occur with China. China currently has DF* missiles positioned for attack on United States naval vessels. If United States satellites were to come under attack, the U.S. military could choose to destroy the part of the Chinese satellite system that provides navigation and positioning for these DF missiles.

The report quoted Director of National Intelligence James Clapper saying that after the year 2015, Chinese and Russian threats to the United States space system will increase. U.S. Department of Defense official Frank Kendall said last March that the United States’ position in space is “particularly bad” because of the improvements that China and Russia have made to their anti-space satellite capabilities. The report says that once a war breaks out with China or Russia, the United States will be unable to rely upon England, Japan and Australia, even if satellites were being shared among countries. In the case of war, “the end of an era of United States space leadership will become a reality.” During an interview with The Washington Post on Jan. 28, Colby said, “Space is a classic example of the American military leadership facing challenges. There is no reason to think that China or Russia will exercise restraint when developing in space.”

In order to respond to possible “space adversaries,” the report advised that the United States should first utilize space weapons to gain victory, even if it is just a local victory. Secondly, the United States should exercise restraint with potential enemies and should not utilize nuclear weapons or other methods to escalate hostilities. The report says that Washington should encourage China and Russia to enter into the Outer Space Treaty, led by the United States.**

The Center for A New American Security was founded in 2007 by Assistant Secretary of State for East Asian and Pacific Affairs Kurt Campbell. Many members of the think tank have previously worked for the White House, the State Department, Congress and other government departments.

According to the report issued on Jan. 28, as reported in the Japanese newspaper The Financial Times, the United States and Japan decided to extend operations of the International Space Station for four more years, ending in the year 2024. Concerned parties fear that if the ISS were to shut down in 2020, China might establish a space station two years later in 2022, and many countries interested in space exploration would approach China. A cosmic version of the Asian Infrastructure Bank, this space station would not only increase China’s influence, but could also cause European military technology to flow into China, which could use these technologies to increase its capabilities for war in space.

*Editor’s note: DF refers to Dongfeng missiles, or “East Wind” missiles.

**Editor’s note: The Outer Space Treaty is formally known as the "Treaty on Principles Governing the Activities of States in the Exploration and Use of Outer Space, including the Moon and Other Celestial Bodies," and forms the basis of international space law.


美智库:美军太空弱点被中国看透 要做冲突准备
【环球军事报道】总部位于华盛顿的智库新美国安全中心于当地时间27日发布报告,警告美军太空系统的弱点已被主要“对手”中国和俄罗斯看透,呼吁五角大楼进行战略转移,为未来与中俄等国的“太空冲突”做好准备。
  这份题为《从圣地到战场——美国太空防务和威慑框架》的报告共44页,作者是新美国安全中心研究员艾布里奇·科尔比,他曾在美国政府任职,2012年担任美国总统候选人米特·罗姆尼的对华政策顾问。该报告提到中国的次数约20次,大部分是将中国和俄罗斯“捆绑”在一起作为美国的“太空对手”进行论述。
  报告称,中俄等国正在获得遏制美国卫星的能力,比如反卫星导弹、网络及其电子攻击方式。这些能力有的可以毁掉美国卫星,有的可致卫星失效,美国的太空资产正变得脆弱。报告以中国2007年的反卫星试验为例,以证明中国的“太空能力”,并且还预想了与中国发生冲突的场景——如果美国卫星遭到袭击,美军可选择摧毁中国的部分卫星系统,这部分卫星系统为“东风”导弹打击美国水面舰艇提供导航和定位。

  报告引述美国国家情报总监克拉珀的话称,2015年以后,美国太空系统遭受的来自中俄的威胁将增加。美国国防部官员肯达尔去年3月直言,美国的太空地位因中俄的反太空能力进步变得“尤其糟糕”。报告称,即使美国和其他国家共享卫星,但一旦和中俄打起仗来,英国、日本、澳大利亚都不可靠,“美国主导太空时代终结已成现实”。科尔比28日在接受《华盛顿邮报》采访时说,“太空是美国军事主导权遭受挑战的典型例子。没有理由相信中俄会在太空发展方面保持克制”。
  为应对“太空敌手”,该报告建议,首先美国可以利用自己的太空武器取得胜利,哪怕是局部性的;其次,美国要与潜在对手中俄保持克制,不要选择用核武器等手段升级战事。报告称,华盛顿应该鼓励中俄加入由美国主导的太空协议。
  新美国安全中心于2007年由前美国助理国务卿坎贝尔牵头创办。该智库的许多成员都有在美国白宫、国务院、国会等部门任职的经历。
  另据《日本经济新闻》28日报道,美国和日本决定将国际空间站的运行时间较原计划延长4年,截止到2024年。日美相关人士担心,中国可能在2022年成立宇宙空间站,如果国际空间站在2020年停止运行,那么两年后将有许多对太空开发感兴趣的国家接近拥有空间站的中国,就此出现“宇宙版亚投行”,这不仅使中国的影响力增强,还可能导致欧洲等地的军事技术流入中国,中国有可能借这些技术提高自己的太空作战能力。
【环球时报驻美国、日本特约记者 许歌 李珍】
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Austria: Musk, the Man of Scorched Earth

Germany: Cynicism, Incompetence and Megalomania

Mexico: EU: Concern for the Press

Austria: The Deal for Kyiv Is Better Than the Many Threats against It

Austria: Trump’s Film Tariffs Hurt Hollywood

Topics

Austria: The Deal for Kyiv Is Better Than the Many Threats against It

Austria: Trump’s Film Tariffs Hurt Hollywood

Japan: Trump’s 100 Days: A Future with No Visible Change So Far

Mexico: EU: Concern for the Press

Austria: Musk, the Man of Scorched Earth

Germany: Cynicism, Incompetence and Megalomania

Austria: Donald Trump Revives the Liberals in Canada

Germany: Absolute Arbitrariness

Related Articles

Mexico: The Trump Problem

Taiwan: Making America Great Again and Taiwan’s Crucial Choice

Venezuela: Vietnam: An Outlet for China

Germany: US Companies in Tariff Crisis: Planning Impossible, Price Increases Necessary