Will the US Intervene in an Iran-Israel Conflict? Political Analyst Weighs the Odds*

Published in NEWS.ru
(Russia) on 20 June 2025
by Konstantin Blokhin (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Nane Sarkisian. Edited by Helaine Schweitzer.
*Editor’s note: On March 4, 2022, Russia enacted a law that criminalizes public opposition to, or independent news reporting about, the war in Ukraine. The law makes it a crime to call the war a “war” rather than a “special military operation” on social media or in a news article or broadcast. The law is understood to penalize any language that “discredits” Russia’s use of its military in Ukraine, calls for sanctions or protests Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. It punishes anyone found to spread “false information” about the invasion with up to 15 years in prison.

Political analyst Konstantin Blokhin believes the U.S. may intervene if Israel faces a serious threat.

Political analyst Konstantin Blokhin told 360.ru that the U.S. could be drawn into a conflict with Iran if Israel’s security is directly threatened. Blokhin noted that U.S. involvement is also likely if Iran targets American military bases in the Middle East.

“If Israel’s existence is at stake, the U.S. will almost certainly intervene,” he said. “But as it stands, the situation is unfolding on relatively equal terms — there’s no clear indication that Iran is gaining the upper hand.”

Blokhin suggested that U.S. President Donald Trump would likely give the order to strike Iran. He pointed to the alignment between Trump's views and those of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu as a key factor.

Trump has previously said that the U.S. could launch attacks on Iranian nuclear facilities, though he also indicated that a return to diplomacy remains a possibility.

**Editor's Note: The U.S. attacked Iran's three nuclear facilities Saturday, June 21.


Политолог Блохин допустил конфликт США с Ираном в случае угрозы для Израиля.

США могут вступить в конфликт с Ираном в случае прямой угрозы для Израиля, заявил в беседе с 360.ru политолог Константин Блохин. Такой сценарий, по его словам, также не исключен, если Иран попытается атаковать американские военные базы на Ближнем Востоке.

Если возникнет угроза существования Израиля, тогда они точно вмешаются. Но очевидно, что пока динамика развивается в целом на равных — нет такого, чтобы прямо Иран выигрывал, — высказался Блохин.

Эксперт склонился к тому, что президент США Дональд Трамп все-таки отдаст приказ ударить по Ирану. В пользу этого говорит схожесть взглядов лидера Белого дома с позицией премьер-министра Израиля Биньямина Нетаньяху.

Трамп ранее заявил, что Соединенные Штаты могут атаковать ядерные объекты на территории Ирана. В то же время глава Белого дома отметил, что рассматривает и вариант возврата к переговорам.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

United Arab Emirates: Were Trump’s Military Powers Revoked?

Egypt: Egypt and the United States: Building the Next Generation of Strategic Partnership

South Korea: Mayor Mamdani Fuels Divide between Democratic Party and Jewish Community

Poland: Europe Hears ‘Enough’ from the US: Clever Poles Refuse To Believe It

Mexico: The End of the USMCA: A Turning Point for Emancipation

Topics

Mexico: The End of the USMCA: A Turning Point for Emancipation

Japan: New York State Legislature Bill Abolishing the Writing of Mother and Father Is Strange

Saudi Arabia: Could There Be a NATO Without the US?

Saudi Arabia: NATO’s Photo-Op in Ankara

Poland: Europe Hears ‘Enough’ from the US: Clever Poles Refuse To Believe It

China: South Korea Must Reflect on America’s Untrustworthiness

Austria: Birthright Citizenship: They Won the Battle, but Not the War

United Arab Emirates: Were Trump’s Military Powers Revoked?

Related Articles

Saudi Arabia: Could There Be a NATO Without the US?

Saudi Arabia: NATO’s Photo-Op in Ankara

Egypt: The Battle of Hormuz: Money or Sovereignty?

United Kingdom: Trump’s Strategic Blunders in His War against Iran

Israel: For the US, Oil Is Thicker Than Blood