Will the US Intervene in an Iran-Israel Conflict? Political Analyst Weighs the Odds*

Published in NEWS.ru
(Russia) on 20 June 2025
by Konstantin Blokhin (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Nane Sarkisian. Edited by Helaine Schweitzer.
*Editor’s note: On March 4, 2022, Russia enacted a law that criminalizes public opposition to, or independent news reporting about, the war in Ukraine. The law makes it a crime to call the war a “war” rather than a “special military operation” on social media or in a news article or broadcast. The law is understood to penalize any language that “discredits” Russia’s use of its military in Ukraine, calls for sanctions or protests Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. It punishes anyone found to spread “false information” about the invasion with up to 15 years in prison.

Political analyst Konstantin Blokhin believes the U.S. may intervene if Israel faces a serious threat.

Political analyst Konstantin Blokhin told 360.ru that the U.S. could be drawn into a conflict with Iran if Israel’s security is directly threatened. Blokhin noted that U.S. involvement is also likely if Iran targets American military bases in the Middle East.

“If Israel’s existence is at stake, the U.S. will almost certainly intervene,” he said. “But as it stands, the situation is unfolding on relatively equal terms — there’s no clear indication that Iran is gaining the upper hand.”

Blokhin suggested that U.S. President Donald Trump would likely give the order to strike Iran. He pointed to the alignment between Trump's views and those of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu as a key factor.

Trump has previously said that the U.S. could launch attacks on Iranian nuclear facilities, though he also indicated that a return to diplomacy remains a possibility.

**Editor's Note: The U.S. attacked Iran's three nuclear facilities Saturday, June 21.


Политолог Блохин допустил конфликт США с Ираном в случае угрозы для Израиля.

США могут вступить в конфликт с Ираном в случае прямой угрозы для Израиля, заявил в беседе с 360.ru политолог Константин Блохин. Такой сценарий, по его словам, также не исключен, если Иран попытается атаковать американские военные базы на Ближнем Востоке.

Если возникнет угроза существования Израиля, тогда они точно вмешаются. Но очевидно, что пока динамика развивается в целом на равных — нет такого, чтобы прямо Иран выигрывал, — высказался Блохин.

Эксперт склонился к тому, что президент США Дональд Трамп все-таки отдаст приказ ударить по Ирану. В пользу этого говорит схожесть взглядов лидера Белого дома с позицией премьер-министра Израиля Биньямина Нетаньяху.

Трамп ранее заявил, что Соединенные Штаты могут атаковать ядерные объекты на территории Ирана. В то же время глава Белого дома отметил, что рассматривает и вариант возврата к переговорам.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Austria: Donald Trump Rules the Superpower That Is Not So Great Anymore

Canada: Europe Has To Choose: Bend the Knee to Trump, or Join Carney’s New World Order

Iraq: US and Its Imagined Enemy

Taiwan: AI and the Prisoner’s Dilemma: Relying on Understanding and Mutual Trust Alone

Australia: As Leaders Meet in New York, the Fate of the World May Rest on Trump and Xi

Topics

United Arab Emirates: US vs. US

Australia: China Is No Longer Playing by American Rules as Xi Jinping Looks to His Next Term

Australia: The Reserve Bank of Australia Has No Choice but To Hike Rates as US Currency Crown Slips

Ireland: Donald Trump Acts as Putin’s Puppet for Reasons Shrouded in Secrecy

Mexico: Comrade Trump

Austria: Donald Trump Rules the Superpower That Is Not So Great Anymore

Iraq: US and Its Imagined Enemy

Australia: The ‘Striking’ Difference in How Trump and Xi Used Their Invisible Summit

Related Articles

Mexico: Comrade Trump

Iraq: US and Its Imagined Enemy

Australia: The ‘Striking’ Difference in How Trump and Xi Used Their Invisible Summit

Austria: Iranians Are Welcome in New York, Palestinians Are Not

Saudi Arabia: Trump’s Positions Are Dictated by the Midterms, and Options Are Running Out in the Face of Protracted Conflict