President Barack Obama has engaged himself in the health care reform debate and set aside reform of the financial system. This will be damaging to him politically.
At the Capitol, Obama's speech about the health care reform was strong, just like the old and good Obama. Convincing and secure. Faced with a rare breach of protocol, when a Congressman called him a liar, Obama did not miss a beat.
After that, we saw his speech on Wall Street in New York, where he spoke about the one year anniversary of Lehman Brothers bankruptcy, a mark in the current crisis. No force, no capability to convince. He seemed kind of bureaucratic, which shows the difference of engagement.
In the end, the idea that Obama is to blame for the crisis is being fabricated. He has been keeping with Bush's program and taking the previous administration's onus. Republicans have been accusing him of giving away taxpayer money and nationalizing the economy.
O presidente Barack Obama tem empenhado toda sua força na discussão sobre a reforma da saúde e deixando de lado a reforma da regulação do sistema financeiro. Isso pode matá-lo politicamente.
O discurso de Obama no Capitólio sobre a reforma da saúde foi forte, o velho e bom Obama. Convincente e seguro. Não foi abalado pela rara quebra de protoloco do deputado que o chamou de mentiroso.
Depois vimos seu discurso no Federal Hall em Nova York, quando falou sobre um ano da quebra do Lehman Brothers, marco da piora da crise. Sem força, sem capacidade de convencimento. Meio burocrático, o que mostra a diferença de empenho.
A summit that would normally send a reassuring message ... faces total uncertainty thanks to the weakness of the United States. The only person to blame for this is Trump.
Secretary Rubio’s ‘diplomatic masterstroke’ in Delhi unintentionally transformed political damage control into an involuntary roast of his own boss.
The Beijing summit did not produce a major agreement between the great powers on the region, but it firmly established that Middle Eastern crises are now deeply tied to the great-power dialogue.
During the Cold War, the United States occupied the apex of this triangular dynamic, pitting China and the USSR against each other. Today, it is Beijing that occupies that apex.
A summit that would normally send a reassuring message ... faces total uncertainty thanks to the weakness of the United States. The only person to blame for this is Trump.
If this electoral gridlock [in domestic policy] does occur, it may well result in Trump — like several other reelected presidents of recent decades — increasingly turning to foreign policy.