The Sentences Imposed on the Proud Boys Leaders Are Harsh and Fair

Published in Frankfurter Rundschau
(Germany) on 1 September 2023
by Thomas Spang (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Kirsty Low. Edited by Michelle Bisson.
The sentences handed down to two leaders of the Proud Boys, Joseph Biggs and Zachary Rehl, are just two of 600 guilty verdicts the U.S. legal system has secured against those who stormed the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021.*

With harsh sentences, the U.S. legal system has delivered the correct response to the violence perpetrated by far right extremist groups. While the 17 and 15-year sentences the judge imposed on Proud Boys leaders Joseph Biggs and Zachary Rehl respectively are shorter than those the prosecutors sought, the verdicts send a signal. Anyone who attacks democratic institutions, such as the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, attacks the will of all citizens.

Biggs and Rehl argued that Donald Trump had enticed them to act in the way they did. They said they believed that the election was stolen. Trump’s incitement may have played a role, but that does not excuse their own actions.

Now that the U.S. legal system has convicted more than 600* of the 1,100 thugs and Trump supporters charged in connection with the riot, it is essential the ideological instigator face trial. That is why the criminal cases facing the former president in Washington and Atlanta are so important.

*Editor's Note: The precise number of people convicted and sentenced in connection with the attack on the Capitol could not be independently verified.


Urteil gegen „Proud Boys“-Führer: Hart und gerecht

Die Urteile gegen „Proud Boys“-Führer Joseph Biggs und Zachary Rehl sind nur zwei von 600 Schuldsprüchen, mit denen der US-Rechtsstaat gegen jene vorgeht, die am 6. Januar 2021 den Kongress attackierten.

Harte Strafen sind die richtige Antwort des US-Rechtsstaats auf die Gewalt, die von rechtsextremen Gruppen ausgeübt wird. Mit 17 und 15 Jahren blieb der Richter im Prozess gegen die beiden „Proud Boy“-Führer Joseph Biggs und Zachary Rehl zwar unter dem geforderten Strafmaß der Staatsanwaltschaft, aber sein Urteil sendet ein Signal. Wer demokratische Institutionen angreift, wie im konkreten Fall den US-Kongress am 6. Januar 2021, attackiert den Willen aller Bürgerinnen und Bürger.

Biggs und Rehe versuchten sich damit herauszureden, Donald Trump habe sie zu ihren Aktionen verführt. Sie hätten geglaubt, dass die Wahlen gestohlen worden seien. Die Anstiftung mag eine Rolle gespielt haben, aber entschuldigt nicht das eigene Tun.

Nachdem der Rechtsstaat bereits mehr als 600 der 1100 wegen des Aufstands angeklagten Schläger und Trump-Mitläufer verurteilt hat, ist es nun unerlässlich, auch dem geistigen Brandstifter den Prozess zu machen. Deshalb sind die Strafprozesse gegen den Ex-Präsidenten von Washington und Atlanta so wichtig.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Germany: Trump Is Yielding a Key Country to Iran*

Saudi Arabia: A Reading of the Trump-Xi Summit

Kenya: Canada PM’s Popularity Has Grown for Leading Revolt against Trump

Nigeria: California Recognizes Lagos, Will Nigeria?

Austria: Iran Gives Trump No Respite before the Midterm Elections

Topics

Egypt: US-Chinese Summit Diplomacy

India: Inside America | 4 Weeks, 1 Big Test for Trump: Can He Swing It the GOP Way?

Kenya: Canada PM’s Popularity Has Grown for Leading Revolt against Trump

Germany: America Looks Weak All Over Again

   

Taiwan: US-China AI Co-opetition* and Taiwan’s Role

Germany: Trump Is Yielding a Key Country to Iran*

Venezuela: Washington and the National Liberation Army

China: Editorial: China-US Consensus on 8 Outcomes Sends a Major Signal

Related Articles

Egypt: US-Chinese Summit Diplomacy

India: Inside America | 4 Weeks, 1 Big Test for Trump: Can He Swing It the GOP Way?

Kenya: Canada PM’s Popularity Has Grown for Leading Revolt against Trump

Germany: America Looks Weak All Over Again

Taiwan: US-China AI Co-opetition* and Taiwan’s Role