Tension Between Obama and Israel

Published in ABC
(Spain) on 25 March 2010
by Editors of ABC (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Scott Clark. Edited by Laura Berlinsky-Schine.
The U.S. Administration is submitting the Israeli government to unprecedented pressure, due to the debatable decisions that have been adopted, of late, concerning the construction of new Jewish settlements in East Jerusalem. If Obama believes that is the most important item on the agenda in dealing with the Israeli prime minister — so important as to be a determining factor in the tenor of relations with his most valuable strategic ally in the entire region — then it is possible that we’re heading toward a period of serious uncertainties in the Near East.

The two-state solution proposed by the United States and the European Union presupposes that Israel, as well as the Palestinians, have to contribute to its formation, as will all the countries in the region. Possible errors by Israel don’t convert the rest of the actors in this conflict into friendly and sincere collaborators in the interests of the West. Additionally, it remains to be seen whether or not the diplomatic isolation to which Washington is sending the Israelis will really convince the other party to negotiate, or if, on the contrary, it will exacerbate the anxieties of those who are not at all interested in bringing about a peaceful solution, including the theocratic regime of Iran, its puppets in Hezbollah and the radical members of Hamas. If it were realistic to believe that the Palestinians were ready to re-engage in negotiations with Israel at this time, maybe then could this North American policy be justified, especially if it were to be applied with the same energy to the Arabs. However, under present circumstances, such an option would probably be counterproductive.

The solution to this conflict that confronts Palestinians and Israelis is as desirable as it is difficult, especially while those who promote violence are the prevailing players. In these moments, Washington should know that the primary threat to peace isn’t the issue of the Jewish settlements, but rather the determination of Iran in its plans to build up its supply of nuclear arms. An Iranian regime suffering a crisis of legitimacy and on the path to building nuclear missiles is a threat of incalculable dimensions for the West, and Israel continues to be our only reliable ally in the region.


LA Administración norteamericana está sometiendo al Gobierno israelí a una presión inédita, a consecuencia de las discutibles decisiones adoptadas recientemente sobre la construcción de nuevos asentamientos judíos en Jerusalén Este. Si Obama cree que ése es el aspecto más importante de la agenda que tenía que tratar con el primer ministro israelí -tanto como para ser determinante en las relaciones con su más valioso aliado estratégico en toda la región- hay que pensar que nos encaminamos hacia un periodo de graves incertidumbres en Oriente Próximo.

La solución de dos Estados que proponen Washington Unidos y la Unión Europea presupone que deben contribuir a construirla tanto Israel como los palestinos, y también todos los países de la región. Los posibles errores de Israel no convierten a los demás actores del conflicto en amables y sinceros cooperadores de los intereses de Occidente. Es más, está por ver si ese aislamiento diplomático al que Washington quiere enviar a los israelíes servirá realmente para alentar a la otra parte a negociar o si, al revés, estimulará a los sectores que no desean, en absoluto, ningún tipo de solución pacífica, desde el régimen teocrático iraní, sus marionetas de Hizbolá o los radicales de Hamas. Si fuera realista creer que los palestinos están preparados para retomar las negociaciones con Israel en estos momentos, quizás entonces estaría justificada esa política norteamericana, sobre todo si se aplicase con la misma energía en el caso de los árabes. Sin embargo, en las actuales circunstancias esta iniciativa representa probablemente una opción contraproducente.

La solución del conflicto que enfrenta a palestinos e israelíes es tan deseable como difícil, sobre todo mientras prevalezcan los que se empeñan en su apuesta por la violencia. En estos momentos, Washington debería saber que la principal amenaza para la paz no son los asentamientos judíos, sino la determinación de Irán en sus planes de dotarse de armamento nuclear. Un régimen iraní en crisis de legitimidad y camino de construir misiles nucleares es una amenaza de dimensiones incalculables para Occidente, e Israel sigue siendo nuestro único aliado fiable en la zona.


This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Singapore: Southeast Asia Has Made the Right Moves in Dealing with Trump

Mexico: Trump’s Climate Denialism vs. Reality

Germany: The Main Thing Is That the War Stops

Germany: Trump’s Peace Plan: Too Good To Be True

Poland: Democrats Have Found an Effective Way To Counter Trump*

Topics

Singapore: Southeast Asia Has Made the Right Moves in Dealing with Trump

Poland: Democrats Have Found an Effective Way To Counter Trump*

Russia: Trump Essentially Begins a ‘Purge’ of Leftist Regimes in Latin America*

Mexico: Trump’s Climate Denialism vs. Reality

Turkey: Dismembering Syria, Bombing Gaza: Can Trump Finally Veto Neocons?

Sri Lanka: Israel-Hamas Truce: Trump’s Peace Push-Dividends or Deception?

Germany: Cooly Calculated: Trump Constructs Authoritarian Realities

Germany: The Main Thing Is That the War Stops

Related Articles

Spain: Spain’s Defense against Trump’s Tariffs

Spain: Shooting Yourself in the Foot

Spain: King Trump: ‘America Is Back’

Spain: Trump Changes Sides

Spain: Narcissists Trump and Musk: 2 Sides of the Same Coin?