We Must Firmly Resist Online Bullying and Build Community with Shared Future for Humanity in Cyberspace

Published in Huanqiu
(China) on 20 July 2021
by (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Jo Sharp. Edited by Helaine Schweitzer.
On July 19, the U.S. White House issued a statement unjustifiably blaming China for recent cyberattacks suffered by the United States. The EU and NATO released statements one after another criticizing China for cybersecurity issues followed by the UK, Australia, Japan, Canada and New Zealand who also made announcements pointing the finger at China. In a moment, cyberspace suddenly changed.

The report, issued jointly by the National Security Agency, the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency and the Federal Bureau of Investigation, smears China for the use of more than 50 cybersecurity tactics, techniques and procedures against the United States and other countries and made this a central component of the evidence against China. However the attack technologies and techniques listed in the report, such as virtual private servers and web shells, are known and common cyberattacks worldwide and do not prove that the relevant activities were carried out by China. Moreover online attacks are by their nature difficult to trace back to their source and difficult to pinpoint. The Microsoft Exchange server vulnerabilities mentioned in the report are publicly shared on open source websites. Any hacker organization or individual could use them after modifying the tools. There is no evidence of any Chinese government support, and it cannot be ruled out that some groups have deliberately created a trail to pin the blame on China.

For a long time now, the U.S. has repeatedly defied international law, violated the basic norms of international relations and used its technological superiority to carry out large-scale, organized and indiscriminate online theft, surveillance and attacks on foreign governments, businesses and individuals. It has even extended its reach to its allies, stealing information on European dignitaries through the intelligence agencies of third countries. America's deplorable behavior has long been well-documented, but the country still wields the weapon of “public opinion” to disguise itself as a cybersecurity “victim,” claiming that it is constantly under attack with the intention of confusing the public. In the absence of any substantive evidence, the U.S. has invented facts, reversed right and wrong and united with many allies to openly accuse China and provoke a direct conflict in cyberspace. The desire to portray a myth as reality not only reflects the Biden administration’s coalition policy but also reveals its intention to join forces with its allies to besiege China. Its deliberate efforts to create momentum only make it more blatant and cannot hide the true face of online hegemony behind the mask of “cyber police.”

Cybersecurity is a global issue that concerns the common interests of all countries. Promoting the transformation of the global system of internet governance is an irresistible trend, and it is what the public wants. The international community needs to work together to protect it. China has always advocated that all countries should jointly respond to non-traditional security threats with cybersecurity at its heart, respecting each nation’s right to choose its own path of digital development, web governance models, internet public policy and equal participation in international cyberspace governance. This does not mean engaging in online hegemony, interfering in the internal affairs of other countries and engaging in, condoning or supporting online activities that endanger the national security of other countries. Cyberspace should not become a battlefield for nations to fight over. The U.S. should immediately abandon its cold war mentality and ideological prejudices and stop its political manipulation of cybersecurity issues. Countries around the world should proactively unite on the premise of mutual respect for digital sovereignty, pay more attention to international cooperation in areas such as cyberterrorism and online crime and strive to build in cyberspace a community of human destiny.


7月19日,美国白宫发布声明,无端将美国近日遭受网络攻击归咎于中国。欧盟、北约接连发表声明就网络安全议题指责中国,英国、澳大利亚、日本、加拿大、新西兰等国家也紧随其后发布公告,将矛头指向中国。一时间,网络空间风云突变。

美国国家安全局、网络安全与基础设施安全局以及联邦调查局联合发布的报告,污蔑中国针对美国等国家使用了50多种网络安全战术、技术和程序,并将此作为指控中国的证据链核心内容。然而,报告中列举的如VPS、WebShell 等攻击技术、手法,均为当前世界范围内公开、常见的网络攻击战术方式,并不能证明相关活动是中国所为。而且,网络攻击本就存在追踪溯源难、精准定位难的特点,而报告中所提及的微软Exchange服务器漏洞及黑客工具本就是开源网站公开分享,任何黑客组织或个人都可能在对工具进行修改后加以利用,没有任何证据表明有中国政府背景支持,不排除有组织刻意制造痕迹,嫁祸栽赃给中国。

一直以来,美国多次无视国际法、违反国际关系基本准则,利用技术优势持续对外国政府、企业和个人实施大规模、有组织、无差别的网络窃密、监控和攻击,甚至将触手伸向其盟国,通过第三国情报机构窃取欧洲国家政要信息。美国恶劣行径早已是证据确凿,而其仍旧挥舞“舆论”武器将自己伪装成网络安全的“受害者”,称不断遭受网络攻击,意图混淆视听。此番在严重缺乏实质证据的情况下,美国凭空杜撰、颠倒是非,联合诸多盟友公然指责中国,在网络空间挑起正面冲突,欲上演“三人成虎”的戏码,不仅体现了拜登政府的联盟政策特点,也暴露了企图联手盟国围剿中国的政治意图,其刻意制造声势的举措更是欲盖弥彰,遮不住其“网络警察”面具下的网络霸权真面目。

网络安全是全球性问题,事关各国共同利益,推进全球互联网治理体系变革是大势所趋、人心所向,需要国际社会共同维护。中国一直以来倡导世界各国共同应对以网络安全为核心的非传统安全威胁,尊重各国自主选择网络发展道路、网络治理模式、互联网公共政策和平等参与国际网络空间治理的权利,不搞网络霸权,不干涉他国内政,不从事、纵容或支持危害他国国家安全的网络活动。网络空间不应成为各国角力的战场,美国应立即摒弃冷战思维和意识形态偏见,停止在网络安全议题上搞政治操弄。世界各国应在彼此尊重网络主权的前提下积极联合起来,将更多注意力聚焦于打击网络恐怖主义和网络犯罪等领域的国际合作,鼎力共建网络空间人类命运共同体。
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Austria: Whether or Not the Tariffs Are Here to Stay, the Damage Has Already Been Done*

Germany: US Sanctions against the EU

Poland: Donald Trump’s Delusions about South Africa

Mexico: From Star Wars to Golden Domes

Topics

Germany: Peace Report 2025: No Common Ground with Trump

Australia: America’s Economic and Political Chaos Has Implications for Australia

Germany: Friedrich Merz’s Visit to Trump Succeeded because It Didn’t Fail

Russia: This Can’t Go On Forever*

Germany: Horror Show in Oval Office at Meeting of Merz and Trump

Related Articles

Hong Kong: The Lessons of World War II: The Real World Importance of Resisting Hegemony

Mexico: The Trump Problem

Taiwan: Making America Great Again and Taiwan’s Crucial Choice

Venezuela: Vietnam: An Outlet for China

Germany: US Companies in Tariff Crisis: Planning Impossible, Price Increases Necessary