When Obama Is Out of Order

Published in ABC
(Spain) on 22 July 2009
by Ramón Pérez-Maura (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Natalia Madroñal . Edited by .

Edited by Christie Chu

Yesterday ABC broke a story that had the feel of an exclusive, but was simply a willingness to talk about what others prefer to ignore: Obama faces serious popularity problems. In these pages we reported a relevant poll by The Washington Post and ABC about the beleaguered health care reform efforts, but the problem is bigger than that.

Obama wanted us to believe that within his first hundred days he was going to make reforms that emulate the interventionist measures that Franklin Delano Roosevelt passed during his first hundred. Thank God he did not live up to these expectations, because now there are many of us who think that the main cause of the long duration of the Great Depression was not the 1929 crash but instead the wrong policies Franklin Delano Roosevelt passed in 1933. Like Roosevelt, Obama thinks that the best way to get out of the current economic debacle is to saturate the system with subsidies, calling this a stimulus package – a brilliant euphemism.

Obama and his Congressional allies passed a 1,071-page bill in under 48 hours that outlined the stimulus program. In apocalyptic terms, Obama pushed his legislation on February 13, warning of ruinous consequences if it did not pass. The republican minority was not able to block it. Obama also asserted that his plan would reinvigorate the economy. This has not been the case.

Today, democrats in Congress predict that the recession will persist despite the immense public funds that have been spent to try to activate the economy. Even more, the president´s empty rhetoric is becoming more and more obvious. For months Obama has argued that the reforms that he proposes in health care, energy and education are tools for reactivating the economy. The strategy is smart politically, but with the passing of time it has become clear that his strategy to face the economic crisis is fundamentally flawed.


ABC anticipaba ayer algo que pudo parecer una exclusiva, pero más bien era voluntad de contar lo que otros prefieren ignorar: Obama afronta problemas serios en su popularidad. En estas páginas se citaba una relevante encuesta de «The Washington Post» y ABC sobre la bloqueada reforma sanitaria, pero el problema va mucho más allá. Obama quiso hacernos creer que en sus cien primeros días iba a hacer unas reformas que emularan las medidas intervencionistas que Franklin Delano Roosevelt pasó en su primera centena. Gracias a Dios, no lo ha conseguido, porque a estas alturas ya somos muchos los que creemos que el mayor causante de la larga duración de la Gran Depresión no fue el crack de 1929 sino las erróneas medidas de Roosevelt a partir de 1933. Como Roosevelt, Obama ha creído que la forma de salir de ésta es regar a casi todos con subsidios, a los que hoy se llama «estímulos». Brillante eufemismo.

Obama y sus aliados del Congreso hicieron pasar en 48 horas una ley de 1.071 páginas en la que se planteaba el programa de estímulos. En términos apocalípticos Obama amenazó con las penas del infierno el pasado 13 de febrero si eso no salía adelante súbito. La minoría republicana no pudo impedirlo. Obama también aseguró que su plan garantizaba la reactivación de la economía. Y tampoco eso se ve. Hoy los demócratas del Congreso están ya convencidos de que la recesión persistirá a pesar del inmenso gasto público para intentar activar la economía. Es más, las trampas del presidente son cada vez más evidentes. Durante meses Obama ha argumentado que las reformas que él proponía para el sistema sanitario, para el energético y el educativo eran herramientas de la reactivación económica. Como estrategia política era brillante. Mas con el paso del tiempo resulta evidente que su estrategia frente a la crisis se resquebraja por la base.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Germany: If You’re Not for Him, You Should Be Afraid*

Cuba: Summit between Wars and Other Disruptions

Spain: Trump-Musk: Affair, Breakup and Reconciliation?

Germany: LA Protests: Why Are So Many Mexican Flags Flying in the US?

Russia: Will the US Intervene in an Iran-Israel Conflict? Political Analyst Weighs the Odds*

Topics

Russia: Will the US Intervene in an Iran-Israel Conflict? Political Analyst Weighs the Odds*

Cuba: Summit between Wars and Other Disruptions

Germany: Resistance to Trump’s Violence Is Justified

Germany: LA Protests: Why Are So Many Mexican Flags Flying in the US?

Spain: Trump-Musk: Affair, Breakup and Reconciliation?

Switzerland: Trump’s Military Contingent in Los Angeles Is Disproportionate and Dangerous

   

Germany: If You’re Not for Him, You Should Be Afraid*

Austria: Trump Is Playing with Fire. Does He Want the Whole House To Go up in Flames?

Related Articles

Spain: Spain’s Defense against Trump’s Tariffs

Spain: Shooting Yourself in the Foot

Spain: King Trump: ‘America Is Back’

Spain: Trump Changes Sides

Spain: Narcissists Trump and Musk: 2 Sides of the Same Coin?