Among the insights of the late Juan Nuño is his observation that we should all vote in U.S. elections, since their results affect the entire world. We are, in fact, very concerned about the decisions Americans will make about who will lead their government. No moment illustrates this more than the present.
Driven by prejudices, resentments and lies cultivated by certain media outlets, two years ago half of American voters elected as president the person whom Bernie Sanders considers the most dangerous to the country in its entire history. A corrupt narcissist with an inferiority complex, lacking moral restraint, who seeks to do as he pleases, flouting rules and agreements simply because he holds the most powerful office in the world.
A quick glance at his 22 months in office reveals, without having to dig too deeply, the following gems: the destruction of the foundations of the Western alliance upon which a rules-based world order had been built; the fabricated trade war against his closest ally, Canada, with significant costs for its population; threats to take another ally, Greenland, by force; deliberate intimidation of many others to extract asymmetrical concessions; the arbitrary and discretionary imposition of tariffs on his trading partners, which has made the flow of goods and services more expensive; not to mention the imperial contempt shown toward his neighbors by replacing the names of the Gulf of Mexico and Lake Ontario (which is Canadian) with “America.” And we can’t forget the real estate projects pursued in various parts of the world under the guise of diplomatic negotiations led by his son-in-law, son, and/or friends.
Even more directly lethal has been his unwavering support for Benjamin Netanyahu’s response to Hamas’ ruthless terrorist attack in 2023, a genocide which has indiscriminately massacred more than 70,000 Gazan citizens, and, using U.S.-supplied weapons, demolished a large portion of the territory where they live. Spurred on by this “friend,” he launched a war against Iran that we still haven’t seen the end of, causing extensive damage and loss of human life, and entrenching in power a bloodthirsty theocratic autocracy that, through its Revolutionary Guard, has murdered thousands of Iranians. It disrupted the daily flow of millions of barrels of crude oil through the Strait of Hormuz, increasing the cost of fuel and of transportation for many goods, and spreading the armed conflict to much of the Middle East.
Now, in an attempt to prevent his party’s defeat in the midterm elections two weeks from now, he is openly betraying Ukrainians by lifting sanctions imposed by the U.S. Congress against Vladimir Putin for his aggression against Ukraine and buying billions of dollars’ worth of diesel from him, all while blaming Volodymyr Zelenskyy for the rise in prices. The fact is that Trump — because this is about him — feels a particular attraction to the “strongman,” a figure he seeks to embody by shaking off democratic checks and balances. Hence his attack on the International Criminal Court, whose mission is to prosecute many of these despots for crimes against humanity. “Might is right!” would be his motto. Only his own morality, so he claims, would limit him from saving the world.
And Venezuela? History has shown us that fascist regimes can only be overthrown by force, and it was Trump who provided that force to remove Nicolás Maduro. For that, we would be eternally grateful — were it not for the fact that he immediately allied himself with Maduro’s former vice president, effectively leaving the dictator’s power structure intact. Some will argue that this assessment is unfair, since hundreds of political prisoners have been released, there is more freedom of speech now, and certain laws, such as the Hydrocarbons Law, have been adapted to current realities. There is also an ongoing negotiation process between representatives of the democratic opposition, led by Dinorah Figuera, and Chavismo, led by Jorge Rodríguez, which formally aims to agree on the conditions that would allow for a peaceful transition to full democracy. High on their agenda is the renewal of the Supreme Court of Justice and the National Electoral Council; if this is carried out satisfactorily, within a reasonable timeframe, it holds out the possibility of a prompt election, with safeguards, to form a stable government that will finally respond to the will of the people. However, suspicion is rising because such progress seems to stem not from a genuine commitment honored by those who still hold power, but rather from pressure exerted by those who hold the reins of the protectorate they have established in Venezuela.
They repeatedly assert that they are following a three-stage strategy: stabilization, economic recovery and democratic transition. We must be patient, they warn us, because each stage is a prerequisite for moving on to the next. In light of this, there are still no dates set for the elections, since Venezuela is not yet ready for them. It is as if the superb organization that guaranteed the overwhelming and indisputable victory on June 28 had never existed. Furthermore, Secretary Marco Rubio — whom we are asked to trust and who appears to be a sensible person, given his extensive political experience — has for a boss the hothead responsible for the aforementioned problems.
And one wonders: If we are to trust Rubio’s strategy, why, after nine months, is it still unknown how much has been deposited into the U.S. Treasury from the export of Venezuelan crude oil, how much has been diverted through collections on accounts there, how much has been handed over to the local agent of the protectorate, and what has she spent it on?
And what about the mega-oil deal that Trump boasts so much about; does it truly serve Venezuela’s interests? It places in the hands of Alejandro Betancourt, with the backing of the Pentagon, the task of securing investments worth billions from the industry’s largest companies to develop a massive concession containing one-fifth of the oil reserves the country claims to have. This individual, known for his involvement with Derwick, a company that defrauded the country through a contract to supply power plants, is anything but trustworthy. Given his company’s limited experience and size, and because what is known about this mega-deal violates the Constitution and the recently amended Hydrocarbons Law itself, there are legitimate doubts about its viability.
Finally, there are indications of the alleged involvement of Trump’s cronies and Rubio himself in the extremely costly hiring of Centerview Partners, an investment fund, to lead the restructuring of the colossal and unpayable external public debt, while the International Monetary Fund — which offers much more solid, competent and less costly support for a realistic debt sustainability analysis that could serve as a basis for negotiating better terms — is being sidelined.
A recent article of mine encouraged readers to think the worst in order to decipher what he had in store for the country. And this collusion between someone who has provided irrefutable proof that he respects no interests other than his own, and someone who represents what remains of the criminal syndicate that plundered the country, does not bode well. If Trump insists on doing as he pleases in his own country, which still preserves its institutions, who is going to restrain him here in Venezuela? One suspects he has found the best ally in Delcy Rodríguez to advance his agenda here. “She’s wonderful!” The possibility that this symbiotic relationship could serve as a vehicle for consolidating crony capitalism, and thereby continuing the plundering of Venezuela, is outrageous and unacceptable.
In the upcoming midterm elections, we won’t be voting, as Nuño demanded, but we can hope that they will be won by a landslide by Democratic representatives — and why not, alongside responsible Republicans who will put a stop to the petty orange threat hanging over us? Even so, some analysts point out that, as a minority, like a cornered animal, he will be even worse. For our part, it is urgent that we advance popular mobilization and create the conditions to elect, as soon as possible, a government and a National Assembly that serve the nation’s interests and can rally the majority to rebuild the country. This is the best signal to send to those up north, as well as to our sister nations, so they understand what our true interests are.
Entre los aciertos del recordado Juan Nuño está el haber señalado que en las elecciones de EE. UU. deberíamos votar todos, pues sus resultados afectan al mundo entero. Somos, efectivamente, dolientes de lo que deciden los estadounidenses sobre quien poner al frente de su gobierno. Ningún momento más aleccionador de ello que el actual. Alentados por prejuicios, resentimientos y mentiras cultivadas en algunos medios, la mitad de los estadounidenses eligieron como presidente hace dos años a la persona que Bernie Sanders considera la más peligrosa para ello en toda la historia de ese país. Un narcisista acomplejado, corrupto y sin freno moral, que busca hacer y deshacer a capricho, saltando por encima de reglas y acuerdos gracias a que ocupa el cargo más poderoso del mundo.
Una rápida ojeada de sus 22 meses de gobierno arroja, sin tener que hurgar mucho, las siguientes perlas: la destrucción de los cimientos de la alianza occidental sobre la que venía sosteniéndose un orden mundial basado en reglas; la guerra comercial inventada contra su aliado más cercano, Canadá, con importantes costos para su población; amenazas de tomar por la fuerza a otro aliado, Groenlandia; intimidación deliberada a muchos más para arrancarles concesiones asimétricas; imposición arbitraria y discrecional de tarifas a sus socios comerciales, que ha encarecido el flujo de bienes y servicios; sin mencionar el desprecio imperial a sus vecinos al sustituir los nombres del Golfo de México y del lago Ontario, canadiense, con el “de América”. No podían faltar los proyectos inmobiliarios perseguidos en distintas partes al amparo de negociaciones diplomáticas conducidas por su yerno, hijo y/o amigos.
Más directamente letal ha sido su respaldo, sin remilgos, a la respuesta genocida de Netanyahu al despiadado ataque terrorista de Hamas de 2023, masacrando, indiscriminadamente, a más de 70.000 ciudadanos gazatíes y arrasando, con armas suministradas por EE. UU., buena parte del territorio en que viven. Espoleado por este “amigo”, lanzó una guerra contra Irán que aún no se le ve fin, causando cuantiosos daños y pérdidas humanas, y atrincherando en el poder a una autocracia teocrática sanguinaria que, con su Guardia Revolucionaria, ha asesinado a miles de iraníes. Interrumpió el flujo diario de millones de barriles de crudo por el Estrecho de Ormuz, elevando los precios del combustible y del transporte de muchos bienes, y extendió el conflicto bélico a buena parte del medio oriente.
Ahora, tratando de evitar la derrota de su partido en dos semanas en las elecciones midterm, traiciona abiertamente a los ucranianos, levantando las sanciones acordadas en el congreso de EE. UU. en contra de Vladimir Putin por su agresión a Ucrania y le compra a éste miles de millones de dólares en diésel, mientras le echa la culpa a Zelenski de su alza de precios. Y es que Trump –porque de él se trata– siente atracción particular por los “hombres fuertes”, figura que pretende encarnar sacudiéndose de los controles democráticos. De ahí su arremetida contra la Corte Penal Internacional, cuya misión es enjuiciar a muchos de estos déspotas por los crímenes de lesa humanidad cometidos. ¡Might is right! sería su consigna. Sólo lo limitaría su propia moral, como afirma, para salvar al mundo.
¿Y Venezuela? La historia enseña que los regímenes fascistas solo salen por la fuerza y Trump fue quien la proporcionó para sacar a Maduro. Por ello estaríamos eternamente agradecidos si no fuera por el hecho de que se alió, de seguidas, con quien fuera su vicepresidente, dejando, en la práctica, la estructura de poder del dictador. Se me objetará que tal señalamiento es injusto, pues ha habido la excarcelación de centenares de presos políticos, hay más libertad de opinión ahora y se adecuaron a las realidades del momento algunas leyes, como la de Hidrocarburos. También hay un proceso de negociación en curso entre representantes de la oposición democrática, encabezados por Dinorah Figuera, y del chavismo, comandados por Jorge Rodríguez, que se propone, formalmente, acordar las condiciones que permitirían una transición pacífica hacia la democracia plena. En su agenda, se ha priorizado la renovación del TSJ y del CNE que, de materializarse a satisfacción en tiempo prudencial, augura posibilidades de una pronta elección, con garantías, para la formación de un gobierno estable que responda, al fin, a la voluntad popular. Sin embargo, surge la suspicacia porque tales avances parecen deberse, no a un compromiso sentido por quienes aún controlan el poder, sino a la presión de quienes tienen agarrado la sartén por el mango del protectorado que instalaron en Venezuela.
Ellos afirman, repetidamente, que se sigue una estrategia de tres etapas: estabilización, recuperación económica y transición democrática. Hay que tener paciencia, nos advierten, pues cada fase es condición para avanzar en la siguiente. En atención a ello, todavía no se anticipan fechas para las elecciones, ya que Venezuela aún no está preparada para ello. Como si la superba organización que garantizó el triunfo abrumador e inobjetable del 28J no hubiera existido. Pero además, el secretario Marco Rubio, en quien se nos pide confiar y parece ser una persona sensata, dada su gran experiencia política, tiene como jefe al energúmeno causante de la problemática antes comentada.
Y uno se pregunta, si debemos confiar en la estrategia de Rubio, ¿Por qué, luego de nueve meses, no se conoce cuánto ha entrado a la Tesorería de EE. UU. proveniente de la exportación de crudo venezolano, cuánto ha sido desviado en cobros de cuentas allá, cuánto se le ha entregado a la agente local del protectorado y en qué lo ha gastado? Y el mega-acuerdo petrolero del que tanto se vanagloria Trump, ¿Recoge el auténtico interés de Venezuela? Pone en manos de Alejandro Betancourt, con respaldo del Pentágono, la búsqueda de inversiones mil-millonarias de las mayores empresas del ramo para desarrollar una gigantesca concesión, contentiva de una quinta parte de las reservas de petróleo que el país alega tener. El referido individuo, conocido por su participación en Derwick, empresa que estafó al país con un contrato para el suministro de plantas eléctricas al país, es todo menos confiable. Por la poca experiencia y tamaño de su empresa, y porque lo conocido de este mega-acuerdo viola la constitución y la propia Ley de Hidrocarburos recientemente reformada, hay dudas legítimas sobre su viabilidad. Finalmente, circulan indicios del presunto involucramiento de amigotes de Trump y del propio Rubio en la tan onerosa contratación de Centerview Partners, fondo de inversiones, para conducir la reestructuración de la descomunal e impagable deuda pública externa, y se margina al FMI, que ofrece un respaldo mucho más sólido, capacitado y menos costoso para un análisis de sostenibilidad de deuda realista que sirva como aval para negociar mejores condiciones..
Un artículo mío reciente invitaba a pensar mal para descifrar lo que se proponía para el país. Y este contubernio entre quien ha dado pruebas fehacientes de no respetar otros intereses que no sean los suyos, con quien representa lo que queda de la corporación criminal que expolió al país, no augura nada nuevo. Si Trump insiste en hacer lo que le apetece en su propio país, que aún preserva sus instituciones, ¿quién lo va a contener aquí en Venezuela? Uno sospecha que consiguió la mejor aliada, en Delcy Rodríguez, para hacer avanzar sus apetencias aquí. “She´s wonderful!” La posibilidad de que esta relación simbiótica sea vehículo para afianzar un capitalismo de compadrazgo (crony capitalism) para continuar con el expolio de Venezuela es indignante e inaceptable.
En las venideras elecciones midterm no votamos, como reclamaba Juan Nuño, pero podemos aspirar a que sean ganadas, de manera contundente, por representantes demócratas –y porqué no, junto a republicanos responsables– que le pongan coto a la amenaza naranja mezquina que pende sobre nosotros. Aun así, algunos analistas señalan que en minoría, cual animal acorralado, será peor. De nuestra parte, urge avanzar en la movilización popular y la creación de condiciones para elegir, cuanto antes, un gobierno y una Asamblea Nacional que responda a los intereses de la nación y que sea capaz de convocar a las mayorías para la reconstrucción del país. La mejor señal para que allá en el norte, como entre nuestros países hermanos, entiendan cuáles son nuestros verdaderos intereses.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link
.
Vice President JD Vance wasted no time in declaring ... that these images from France are a warning about the dangers of a Democratic victory in his country.
Vice President JD Vance wasted no time in declaring ... that these images from France are a warning about the dangers of a Democratic victory in his country.
History does not repeat itself. Yet the desire to carve up territory and spheres of influence between powerful players has an alarmingly familiar ring.