Federal Reserve Cuts Interest Rates in Unprecedented Move; Korean Economic Environment Is Different

Published in Hankyung
(South Korea) on 4 March 2020
by Editorial (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Sean Kim. Edited by Helaine Schweitzer .
On March 3, the U.S. Federal Reserve suddenly lowered its benchmark interest rates by 0.50% to a range of 1.00% to 1.25% annually. This is the first time since the 2008 financial crisis that the Fed lowered interest rates at an emergency meeting, and also the first time since then that rates were cut by twice the usual reductions of 0.25%.*

The American stock market showed anxiety over the sudden and shocking reduction of the benchmark interest rates. The three major New York stock market indexes, including the Dow Jones Industrial Average, dropped almost 3% on the day interest rates were cut. This is because of the surge of worry that the shock of the COVID-19 outbreak may be greater than expected given the Fed’s need to take such unprecedented action. People have contradictory expectations for the effect that lowering interest rates will have. This is because there’s a sense that this action will only have only a limited effect in solving the disruption in the global value chain caused by COVID-19. However, many believe that a fiscal policy that increases demand by lowering interest rates may help to stimulate investment and consumer spending.

Our country stands among those most vulnerable to the shocks of COVID-19 because of our high dependency on foreign trade with countries like China. That is why it has been predicted that Korea will soon follow the trend of lowering interest rates. The problem is that the effects of this fiscal policy would be much weaker in Korea compared to leading industrial nations like the United States. Because of a frozen labor market and anti-corporate policy that blocks the entry of new industry, additional money being released into the market by lower interest rates would not result in increased consumption. If the government just pours funds into the market clogging the flow of money, lowering interest rates could stimulate the housing market, and possibly cause a real estate bubble and increase household debt. This environment is very different than the United States, where there is respect for both the autonomy of industry and civilian life.

In order to minimize the side effects of this fiscal policy and maximize its positive impact, we must first improve the fundamental structure of the economy. This is only possible if it is supported by drastic regulatory reform to stimulate corporate investment, restructuring industry, and labor reform. There is an urgent need for a transformation in government policy.

*Editor’s update: In response to the COVID-19 outbreak, the Federal Reserve cut interest rates to zero on Sunday, March 15.


미국 중앙은행(Fed)이 3일(현지시간) 전격적으로 기준금리를 연 1.00~1.25%로 0.5%포인트 인하했다. Fed가 정례회의가 아닌 시점에서 금리를 내린 것도, 통상적인 수준(0.25%포인트)의 두 배를 내린 것도 2008년 글로벌 금융위기 이후 처음이다.

미국 증권시장은 전격적이고 파격적인 기준금리 인하에도 불안감을 드러냈다. 다우존스30산업평균지수 등 뉴욕증시 3대 지수가 이날 3% 가까이 폭락했다. Fed가 파격적인 대응에 나서야 할 정도로 코로나19의 충격이 클 것이라는 우려가 팽배했기 때문이다. 금리인하 효과에 대한 전망도 엇갈리고 있다. 코로나19로 인한 글로벌 밸류체인(국제분업 구조) 차질 등의 해결에 제한적일 수 있다는 이유에서다. 하지만 저금리로 수요를 진작시키는 통화정책이 위축된 투자와 소비를 자극하는 데 어느 정도 도움이 될 것이라는 점에는 이견이 별로 없다.


우리나라는 중국 및 무역 의존도가 높아 코로나19 충격에 가장 취약한 나라 중 하나다. 한국은행이 금리인하 추세에 조만간 보조를 맞출 것이라는 관측이 제기되는 이유다. 문제는 통화정책 효과가 미국 등 주요 선진국에 비해 크게 떨어진다는 것이다. 경직화된 노동시장, 신(新)산업 진입을 막는 기득권 규제 등 곳곳에 도사린 반(反)기업 정책 탓에 금리를 내려 돈을 풀어도 좀처럼 소비와 투자 확대로 이어지지 않고 있다. 정부가 재정을 퍼붓는데도 ‘돈맥경화’가 심각한 상황에서 금리만 내리면 집값을 자극해 부동산 거품과 가계 부채를 키울 가능성이 높다. 기업 자율성과 민간 활력을 존중하는 미국과는 정책 환경이 크게 다르다.

이런 통화정책의 부작용을 최소화하고 순기능을 극대화하려면 경제체질 개선이 선행돼야 한다. 기업 투자를 자극할 과감한 규제 개혁, 산업구조조정, 노동개혁이 뒷받침돼야 가능하다. 정부 정책 대전환이 시급하다.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Germany: Horror Show in Oval Office at Meeting of Merz and Trump

Russia: This Can’t Go On Forever*

Germany: Trump’s Tariff Policy: ‘Dealmaker’ under Pressure

Germany: Friedrich Merz’s Visit to Trump Succeeded because It Didn’t Fail

Germany: US Sanctions against the EU

Topics

Canada: Trump vs. Musk, the Emperor and the Oligarch

Russia: Trump Is Shielding America*

Germany: Peace Report 2025: No Common Ground with Trump

Australia: America’s Economic and Political Chaos Has Implications for Australia

Ireland: The Irish Times View on Turmoil in Los Angeles: Key Test of Trump’s Power

Germany: Friedrich Merz’s Visit to Trump Succeeded because It Didn’t Fail

Related Articles

Canada: No, Joly, We Don’t Want America’s Far-Left Academic Refugees

Mexico: Trump and His Pyrrhic Victories

Germany: US Companies in Tariff Crisis: Planning Impossible, Price Increases Necessary

France: Donald Trump’s Dangerous Game with the Federal Reserve

Israel: Trump Successfully Weakens the Dollar and Creates Danger for the US Economy