In reality, the project implemented by President Joe Biden is in the same vein as some of the most radical proposals for change ever made by Democrats: the plans proposed by Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders.
His decisions, however, have not triggered the virulent reactions that were caused by Sanders’ and Warren’s proposals. In fact, Biden’s decisions have elicited strong public support and agreement, or at least not war, from those threatened with tax increases.
How has Biden been able to advance this revolutionary government project without polarizing the country? Ben Mathis-Lilley’s take in Slate is insightful and convincing.
Biden has been able to paint his proposal as a "class warfare without the war" by using intelligent and moderate language. Where Sanders and Warren declared hostilities and pointed out enemies, Biden speaks gently, does not single out people or groups and proposes agreements instead of battles.
Sanders and Warren exhausted themselves by calling out enemies: "private health insurance companies," "the pharmaceutical industry," "Walmart," "the fast food industry," "Corporate America," "the fossil fuel industry," "the top 1%" and "Wall Street."
Sanders' and Warren’s rhetoric when referring to that world often included the words "destroy," "greed," "hatred" and "lies," in the context of a battle to be fought on every front.
Mathis-Lilley says that Biden "has adopted the descriptive language of the left in many ways, making frequent reference to the portion of the Donald Trump tax cuts that benefited the top 1% of earners," but highlighting the idea of "rewarding work, not wealth." Biden expresses his concern for those who have been "left behind" by those "at the top."
Biden, however, has not taken on a confrontational tone. He has not used the words "cheat," "corruption," "greed" or "trap" since he became president. "Twelve of the 14 times he’s said Wall Street, it’s been to suggest that its analysts support his economic vision."
This paradigm shift has not come in the midst of a bitter battle, but a "class warfare without the war." The moral of the story for those who want to bring about transformation: you can change things without yelling at history.
El secreto de Biden
En los hechos, el proyecto puesto en marcha por el presidente Joseph Biden está en el rumbo de las más radicales propuestas de cambio hechas por los demócratas: las de Elizabeth Warren y Bernie Sanders.
Sus decisiones, sin embargo, no han provocado las reacciones virulentas que provocaban las propuestas de Sanders y Warren. De hecho, han suscitado altos apoyos en la opinión pública, y la anuencia, o al menos la no guerra, de los previsibles amenazados con alzas de impuestos.
¿Cómo ha podido Biden avanzar este proyecto revolucionario de gobierno sin polarizar al país? La respuesta de Ben Mathis-Lilley en Slate es perspicaz y convincente (https://bit.ly/3fZ8rtX).
Biden ha podido colar su propuesta de una “guerra de clases sin guerra” por la inteligencia y la moderación de su lenguaje. Ahí donde Sanders y Warren declaraban las hostilidades y señalaban adversarios, Biden habla con suavidad, no particulariza y propone acuerdos, no batallas.
Sanders y Warren se cansaron de señalar al enemigo: “las compañías de seguros privadas”, “la industria farmacéutica”, “Walmart”, “la industria de comida rápida”, “la América Corporativa”, “la industria de combustibles fósiles”, “el 1 por ciento más rico”, “Wall Street”.
El discurso de Sanders y Warren para referirse a ese mundo incluía con frecuencia las palabras “destruir”, “codicia”, “odio”, “mentiras”, en el contexto de una batalla por ser librada en cada frente.
Biden, dice Mathis-Lilley, “ha adoptado el lenguaje de la izquierda en muchos aspectos, haciendo referencias frecuentes al 1 por ciento beneficiado por los recortes de impuestos de Trump”, pero subrayando la idea de “premiar el trabajo, no la riqueza” y expresando su preocupación por los que han sido “dejados atrás” por los “de arriba”.
Biden no ha asumido, sin embargo, un tono de confrontación. Desde que es presidente no ha usado las palabras “engañar”, “corrupción”, “codicia”, “trampa”. “Doce de las catorce veces que ha mencionado a Wall Street, ha sido para pedir apoyo a su visión de lo que hay que hacer con la economía”.
Y el cambio de paradigma ha zarpado no en medio de una batalla fragorosa sino de una “guerra de clases, sin guerra”. Moraleja para transformadores: se pueden cambiar las cosas sin hablarle a gritos a la historia.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link
.