US Powerless To Stop European Nations from Joining AIIB

Published in Wen Wei Po
(Hong Kong) on 18 March 2015
by (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Nathan Hsu. Edited by Laurence Bouvard.
U.K.-based newspaper The Financial Times reported that France, Germany and Italy have all agreed to join the Chinese-led Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB), bringing the number of member nations to 31 in total. The three nations' requests to join the AIIB followed close behind that of the United Kingdom and are significant not only in expanding the bank's "circle of friends," but also in their implication that the United States is now powerless to stop China from establishing the institution.

China has taken the lead with the AIIB, aiming to promote infrastructural investment throughout Asia in fields such as transportation, energy and telecommunications. China raised the proposition in October 2013, and on Oct. 24, 2014, the first group of 21 prospective founding member nations that included China, India and Singapore signed a memorandum of understanding. The United States rejected an invitation to participate, and further admonished its allies — including Australia, South Korea, the United Kingdom and other European nations — not to join the AIIB. But with the United Kingdom becoming the first non-Asian nation to apply for entry into the AIIB and France, Germany and Italy following suit, it seems that many U.S. allies disagree with how the United States has resisted the AIIB in order to check China.

According to the analysis in The Financial Times, the issue of the AIIB represents a new conflict within U.S.-Chinese competition. It further commented that a contest between the two states to win the throne of global economic leadership in the 21st century is inevitable; that as the standing leader, the United States naturally wishes that China would support the international rules and institutions that the United States has led for 70 years; and that as a rising power, China naturally intends to challenge a status quo that it has had no hand in making, and subsequently forge its own restructured order. The reality, however, is that China has been given the opportunity to develop by the existing international order, and it has no designs on challenging the United States. But said international order is an imperfect one, and China's efforts to establish the AIIB are a move to improve matters. By establishing a new model of great power relations, the United States and China can avoid the historical clashes that see coexistence and cooperation become difficult between rising and established powers.

Mutual benefit has become the hallmark of Chinese diplomacy. The problem is that the United States urges China to undertake responsibility commensurate with its growing strength, but the United States only stands in the way when China moves in that direction, as it has with the AIIB. Such behavior is shortsighted and hypocritical. The United States should adjust course and, like the United Kingdom and other U.S. allies, let wisdom prevail in choosing to accept China's invitation to join the AIIB. The United States should also encourage the World Bank and other multilateral financial mechanisms to cooperate closely with the new institution. By doing so, the AIIB will be able to play a more positive role in the global economy, advance regional development, and bring greater prosperity to the entire world.


英國《金融時報》報道,法國、德國和意大利同意加入由中國主導的亞洲基礎設施投資銀行,將使亞投行擴大至31個成員國。繼英國之後,法、德、意也要求加入亞投行,其意義絕不僅僅是亞投行「朋友圈」的擴大,也意味覑美國無法阻擋中國發起成立亞投行的步伐。

亞投行是由中國牽頭主導,旨在推動亞洲在運輸、能源、電信以及其他基礎設施領域的投資。2013年10月中方提出倡議,2014年10月24日中國、印度、新加坡等21個首批意向創始成員國簽署籌建備忘錄。美國拒絕了這一邀請,而後還游說其盟友(包括澳大利亞、韓國、英國和其他歐洲國家)不要加入亞投行。但是,英國是第一個亞洲區域以外的國家申請加入亞投行,法、德和意大利追隨英國腳步,意味覑美國的盟友並不認同美國為遏制中國而抵制亞投行的錯誤做法。

《金融時報》的分析稱,亞投行問題代表覑中美競爭中的新衝突: 為爭奪21世紀世界經濟領導者的寶座,中美之間不可避免地會相互競爭;作為現任領導者,美國自然希望中國支持美國70年來一直領導的國際規則和國際機構,而作為一個崛起中的強國,中國自然想挑戰自己未曾參與建立的現狀,並開始自行打造一個修正過的秩序。實際情況是,中國在現有國際秩序中獲得了發展機遇,無意挑戰美國。不過,現有國際秩序並不完善,中國發起成立亞投行,是對現有國際秩序的完善。中美兩國建立新型大國關係,可以避免歷史上曾出現的國強必霸、後起與現存大國無法共贏共存的局面。

共贏已成為中國外交的旗幟。問題是,美國一方面要求中國承擔與其不斷增強的實力相一致的責任,另一方面當中國朝這方向前進,就如中國在亞投行這件事中所做的那樣,美國卻試圖阻止中國。美國的做法是短視和虛偽的。美國應該調整方向,像英國以及美國的其他盟友那樣,明智地選擇接受中國的邀請加入亞投行。美國還應鼓勵世行和其他現有多邊貸款機構與亞投行密切合作。這樣,亞投行項目就能在世界經濟中扮演更積極角色,推動區域發展,造福全球。
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Russia: Will the US Intervene in an Iran-Israel Conflict? Political Analyst Weighs the Odds*

India: What if Trump Has Just Started Another ‘Forever War’?

Taiwan: Taiwan Issue Will Be Harder To Bypass during Future US-China Negotiations

Spain: Trump-Musk: Affair, Breakup and Reconciliation?

Germany: Resistance to Trump’s Violence Is Justified

Topics

India: What if Trump Has Just Started Another ‘Forever War’?

Russia: Will the US Intervene in an Iran-Israel Conflict? Political Analyst Weighs the Odds*

Cuba: Summit between Wars and Other Disruptions

Germany: Resistance to Trump’s Violence Is Justified

Germany: LA Protests: Why Are So Many Mexican Flags Flying in the US?

Spain: Trump-Musk: Affair, Breakup and Reconciliation?

Switzerland: Trump’s Military Contingent in Los Angeles Is Disproportionate and Dangerous

   

Germany: If You’re Not for Him, You Should Be Afraid*

Related Articles

Taiwan: Taiwan Issue Will Be Harder To Bypass during Future US-China Negotiations

Hong Kong: Amid US Democracy’s Moral Unraveling, Hong Kong’s Role in the Soft Power Struggle

Russia: Trump Is Shielding America*

Germany: Horror Show in Oval Office at Meeting of Merz and Trump

Hong Kong: Foreign Media Warn US Brand Reputation Veering toward ‘Collapse’ under Trump Policy Impact