[F]or those who live by war and love the smell of gunpowder, reason is just an obstacle to their dreams of greatness.
Burdening other countries with the responsibility is like putting the saddle on the wrong horse.
[W]hat the Switzerland negotiations ultimately lead to may help determine who the next U.S. president will be, as much as they will define the rules of the game in the Middle East.
The terms of the U.S.-Iran agreement are shrouded in ambiguity.
The likelihood is that the outcomes weren’t as favorable as [Trump] initially hoped.
The agreements are not the EU’s problem; it is the lack of political will in its capital cities.
Who will hold out longer, Iran under a naval blockade or the world economy without 20% of its oil and gas supply?
The question Trump faces in Beijing will no longer be “whether he can strike a deal,” but rather, “what will he give up to get one.”
The question raised ... is one that the entire world is curious about: Does Trump himself actually understand the state of the war?
Trump ... stated that he would personally travel to Pakistan to sign the agreement if the talks were successful.
Will Trump continue negotiations even if it requires extending the current ceasefire?
The Trump administration delivered a peace proposal to Tehran that effectively reintroduces terms negotiated by Barack Obama in ... 2015.